Extended follow-up of outcome measures in multiple myeloma patients treated on a phase I study with bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

2006 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne E. Biehn ◽  
Dominic T. Moore ◽  
Peter M. Voorhees ◽  
Reynaldo A. Garcia ◽  
Mary Jo Lehman ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7617-7617 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Biehn ◽  
D. T. Moore ◽  
P. M. Voorhees ◽  
R. A. Garcia ◽  
M. J. Lehman ◽  
...  

7617 Background: Preclinical studies of bortezomib (bort) with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) showed enhanced anti-tumor efficacy compared with either single agent. This led to a phase I trial in patients (pts) with advanced hematologic malignancies who received bort on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 at 0.9–1.5 mg/m2, and PLD on day 4 at 30 mg/m2, every three weeks (Blood 105:3058, 2005). Significant activity was seen, with 36% of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) pts achieving a complete or near-complete response, while 73% attained at least a partial response. It was therefore of interest to define time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) with this regimen. Methods: Additional follow-up was obtained on all 22 evaluable MM pts. TTP and OS were determined from day 1 of bort/PLD, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate time-to-event estimators. The log-rank test was used to compare TTP and time to retreatment (TTR) on bort/PLD vs. the prior therapy. Cox regression was used to evaluate covariates for association with TTP and OS. Results: Median TTP with bort/PLD was 9.3 months (mos)(95% confidence interval (CI) 8.3–22.4) versus 3.8 mos (95% CI 2.3–10.0) on the pt’s prior therapy (p=0.04). Similarly, the median TTR after bort/PLD was prolonged (p=0.04) compared with TTR after the prior regimen, with 3 pts having not yet received their next therapy. With a median follow-up of 36 mos, 13 of these patients (59%) remain alive, and the median OS has not yet been reached. Karnofsky performance status was significantly associated with TTP (p=0.02), while the hematocrit (hct; p=0.06) and IgA subtype (p=0.08) had borderline significance. Hct was significantly associated with OS (p=0.03), while the number of prior regimens (p=0.07) and the platelet count (p=0.06) had borderline significance. Conclusions: Bort alone induced a median TTP of 6.6 mos and OS of 16 mos in MM (N Engl J Med 348: 2609, 2003). The current results support the possibility that the bort/PLD regimen may improve upon TTP, and especially OS, compared with bort alone. This hypothesis is being studied in a randomized, international phase 3 trial ( NCT00103506 ) comparing bort and bort/PLD. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4774-4774
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Laura V. Stampleman ◽  
Alberto Bessudo ◽  
Peter J. Rosen ◽  
Leonard M Klein ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), such as thalidomide and lenalidomide (LEN) and its newest derivative pomalidomide (POM), have shown great promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). POM has in vitro anti-MM potency and has shown efficacy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MM pts. POM with dexamethasone (DEX) induces responses even for MM pts who are refractory to bortezomib (BORT) and LEN (Richardson et al, 2012). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with BORT is FDA-approved for the treatment of MM pts who have received one prior therapy not containing BORT. The combination of PLD and LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for both RR and frontline MM pts (Offidani et al, 2006; 2007). We have also demonstrated that both the efficacy and tolerability of LEN in combination with DEX, PLD and BORT (DVD-R) may be improved by changing the doses and schedules of these drugs (Berenson et al, 2012). Based on these results, we hypothesized that the combination of POM, DEX and PLD would be effective for the treatment of RRMM pts. Thus, we conducted the first study investigating the safety and efficacy of POM in combination with intravenous (IV) DEX and PLD as a phase 1/2 trial using a modified dose, schedule and longer 28-day cycles for pts with RRMM. Methods The phase 1 portion enrolled MM pts w/ progressive disease whereas those enrolled in phase 2 also had to be refractory to LEN (single-agent or in combination), as demonstrated by progressive disease while receiving their last LEN-containing regimen or relapsed within 8 weeks of their last dose of this IMiD. Pts who have previously received POM treatment were ineligible. In the phase 1 portion, POM was administered at 2, 3 or 4 mg daily in three cohorts on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle and DEX (40 mg) and PLD (5 mg/m2) were fixed and given intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Results As of June 20th, 2014, 48 pts were enrolled in the trial and a total of 47 pts had received study drug. Pts had received a median of 4 prior treatments (range 1-18), with a median of 2 prior IMiD-containing regimens (range, 0-8). Fifty-three percent of the pts had received a prior PLD-containing regimen and 21% had received a prior IMiD and PLD combination treatment. Among all enrolled pts, 40 pts discontinued treatment and seven remain active. Pts completed a median of 3 cycles (range: 1-8), with a median follow-up time of 5.4 months (range: 0-22). During the phase 1 portion of the trial, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of POM was established at 4 mg. Enrollment of pts into the phase 2 portion of the trial began at the MTD. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed at this dose in 10/17 (58.8%) phase 2 pts; and, as a result, the protocol was amended so that the MTD was lowered to 3 mg for all pts subsequently enrolled. Among the 36 pts enrolled in phase 2, 78% percent were refractory to LEN and steroids with or without other agents and 47% had previously received PLD. A median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 8) were administered among the pts enrolled in phase 2. Thirty-five pts were evaluable for response as one pt was active but had not yet had any post-baseline disease assessments. Among all pts enrolled in phase 2, the overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 29% and 49%, respectively, with 6 pts (17%) showing stable disease and 12 pts (34%) demonstrating progressive disease. For all pts enrolled in phase 2, the median follow-up time was 4.7 months (range 0-12) and the median PFS was 5.3 months. ORR and CBR for pts in the phase 2 were higher among pts receiving POM at 3 mg (32% and 58%, respectively) than among pts receiving POM at 4 mg (25% and 37%, respectively). Pts receiving the 4 mg dose of POM experienced more toxicities resulting in discontinuations, which likely explains the lower ORR and CBR observed among pts receiving this POM dose. Common ≥ grade 3 adverse events observed throughout the trial were neutropenia (21 pts; 44.7%), lymphopenia (10 pts; 21.3%), and hyponatremia (4 pts; 8.5%). One pt died of grade 5 sepsis. Conclusions This phase 1/2 trial is the first evaluating POM with PLD and DEX and demonstrates that the combination of POM at 3 mg, PLD and DEX using a modified 28-day cycle schedule is safe and effective for the treatment of MM pts refractory to LEN. Disclosures Berenson: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Swift:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Vescio:Celgene: Honoraria.


2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
pp. 5912-5919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepu Mirchandani ◽  
Howard Hochster ◽  
Anne Hamilton ◽  
Leonard Liebes ◽  
Herman Yee ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 425-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Chastagner ◽  
Bénédicte Devictor ◽  
Birgit Geoerger ◽  
Isabelle Aerts ◽  
Pierre Leblond ◽  
...  

Chemotherapy ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 441-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Morgensztern ◽  
Maria Q. Baggstrom ◽  
Giancarlo Pillot ◽  
Benjamin Tan ◽  
Paula Fracasso ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5383-5383 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Berenson ◽  
Laura Stampleman ◽  
Alberto Bessudo ◽  
Peter J Rosen ◽  
Leonard M. Klein ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), such as thalidomide and lenalidomide (LEN) and its newest derivative pomalidomide (POM), have shown great promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). POM has in vitro anti-MM potency and has shown efficacy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MM pts. POM with dexamethasone (DEX) induces responses even for MM pts who are refractory to bortezomib (BORT) and LEN (Richardson et al, 2012). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with BORT is FDA-approved for the treatment of MM pts who have received one prior therapy not containing BORT. The combination of PLD and LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for both RR and frontline MM pts (Offidani et al, 2006; 2007). We have also demonstrated that both the efficacy and tolerability of LEN in combination with DEX, PLD and BORT (DVD-R) may be improved by changing the doses and schedules of these drugs (Berenson et al, 2012). Based on these results, we hypothesized that the combination of POM, DEX and PLD would be effective for the treatment of RRMM pts. Thus, we conducted the first study investigating the safety and efficacy of POM in combination with intravenous (IV) DEX and PLD as a phase 1/2 trial using a modified dose, schedule and longer 28-day cycles for pts with RRMM. Methods The phase 1 portion enrolled MM pts w/progressive disease whereas those enrolled in phase 2 also had to be refractory to LEN (single-agent or in combination), as demonstrated by progressive disease while receiving their last LEN-containing regimen or relapsed within 8 weeks of their last dose of this IMiD. Pts who previously received POM treatment were ineligible. POM was administered orally on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, while DEX (40 mg) and PLD (5mg/m2) were both infused on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. During phase 1 enrollment, three cohorts were enrolled at 2, 3 and 4 mg doses of POM, and DEX and PLD were both administered at fixed doses. Phase 2 enrollment commenced once the MTD was established from the phase 1 portion of the study. Results As of August 1, 2015, 70 pts were screened, 68 were enrolled in the trial (with the pre-planned enrollment goal reached) and had received study drug, and a total of 50 pts were evaluable for safety and efficacy. Among all enrolled pts, 60pts discontinued treatment and 8 remain active. Pts had received a median of 4 prior treatments (range 1-18). Median number of cycles for all pts was 4 (range 1-8), with a median follow-up time of 5.5 months (range 0-22). During the phase 1 portion of the trial, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of POM was established at 4 mg. Enrollment of pts into the phase 2 portion of the trial began at the MTD. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed at this dose in 10/17 (58.8%) phase 2 pts; and, as a result, the protocol was amended so that the MTD was lowered to 3 mg for all pts subsequently enrolled. Among the 57 pts enrolled in phase 2, 53% percent were refractory to LEN and steroids with or without other agents and 31% had previously received PLD. A median of 4 cycles (range, 1 to 8) were administered among the pts enrolled in phase 2. Fifty-five pts were evaluable for response as 2 pts are active but have not yet had any post-baseline disease assessment. Among all evaluable pts (n=55) enrolled in phase 2, the overall response rate (ORR) was 33% (CR= 5%, VGPR= 5% and PR=23%) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 47% with 11 pts (26%) showing stable disease and 5 pts (12%) demonstrating progressive disease. For all evaluable pts enrolled in phase 2, the median follow-up time was 3.6 months (range 0-12 months) and the median PFS was 4.2 months (range 0.3- 29.0+). ORR and CBR for pts in the phase 2 were higher among pts receiving POM at 3 mg (36% and 51%, respectively) than among pts receiving POM at 4 mg (25% and 37%, respectively). Pts receiving the 4 mg dose of POM experienced more toxicities resulting in discontinuations, which likely explains the lower ORR and CBR observed among pts receiving this POM dose. Common ≥ grade 3 adverse events observed throughout the trial were neutropenia (49 pts; 72.0%), lymphopenia (36 pts; 52.9%), leukopenia (33 pts; 48.5%), hyponatremia (27 pts; 39.7%), and hypokalemia (26pts; 38.2%). One pt died of grade 5 sepsis. Conclusions This phase 1/2 trial is the first evaluating POM with PLD and DEX and demonstrates that the combination of POM at 3 mg, PLD and DEX using a modified 28-day cycle schedule is safe and effective for the treatment of MM pts refractory to LEN. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Oncology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Mavroudis ◽  
Ch. Kouroussis ◽  
S. Kakolyris ◽  
S. Agelaki ◽  
K. Kalbakis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document