A prognostic index for risk stratification for acute heart failure and death in subjects with ischemic cardiomyopathy and cardiac defibrillator

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanfranco Antonini ◽  
Cristina Mollica ◽  
Antonio Auriti ◽  
Christian Pristipino ◽  
Vincenzo Pasceri ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwath Radhachandran ◽  
Anurag Garikipati ◽  
Nicole S. Zelin ◽  
Emily Pellegrini ◽  
Sina Ghandian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Effective patient risk stratification is essential to guiding hospitalization decisions and the clinical management of AHF. Clinical decision support systems can be used to improve predictions of mortality made in emergency care settings for the purpose of AHF risk stratification. In this study, several models for the prediction of seven-day mortality among AHF patients were developed by applying machine learning techniques to retrospective patient data from 236,275 total emergency department (ED) encounters, 1881 of which were considered positive for AHF and were used for model training and testing. The models used varying subsets of age, sex, vital signs, and laboratory values. Model performance was compared to the Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) model, a commonly used system for prediction of seven-day mortality in the ED with similar (or, in some cases, more extensive) inputs. Model performance was assessed in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results When trained and tested on a large academic dataset, the best-performing model and EHMRG demonstrated test set AUROCs of 0.84 and 0.78, respectively, for prediction of seven-day mortality. Given only measurements of respiratory rate, temperature, mean arterial pressure, and FiO2, one model produced a test set AUROC of 0.83. Neither a logistic regression comparator nor a simple decision tree outperformed EHMRG. Conclusions A model using only the measurements of four clinical variables outperforms EHMRG in the prediction of seven-day mortality in AHF. With these inputs, the model could not be replaced by logistic regression or reduced to a simple decision tree without significant performance loss. In ED settings, this minimal-input risk stratification tool may assist clinicians in making critical decisions about patient disposition by providing early and accurate insights into individual patient’s risk profiles.


Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (9) ◽  
pp. 1157-1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean P. Collins ◽  
Peter S. Pang

Biomarkers ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 706-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J. Fermann ◽  
Christopher J. Lindsell ◽  
Alan B. Storrow ◽  
Kimberly Hart ◽  
Matthew Sperling ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3394
Author(s):  
Yasuyuki Shiraishi ◽  
Shun Kohsaka ◽  
Takayuki Abe ◽  
Toshiyuki Nagai ◽  
Ayumi Goda ◽  
...  

Early and rapid risk stratification of patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is crucial for appropriate patient triage and outcome improvements. We aimed to develop an easy-to-use, in-hospital mortality risk prediction tool based on data collected from AHF patients at their initial presentation. Consecutive patients’ data pertaining to 2006–2017 were extracted from the West Tokyo Heart Failure (WET-HF) and National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (NaDEF) registries (n = 4351). Risk model development involved stepwise logistic regression analysis and prospective validation using data pertaining to 2014–2015 in the Registry Focused on Very Early Presentation and Treatment in Emergency Department of Acute Heart Failure Syndrome (REALITY-AHF) (n = 1682). The final model included data describing six in-hospital mortality risk predictors, namely, age, systolic blood pressure, blood urea nitrogen, serum sodium, albumin, and natriuretic peptide (SOB-ASAP score), available at the time of initial triage. The model showed excellent discrimination (c-statistic = 0.82) and good agreement between predicted and observed mortality rates. The model enabled the stratification of the mortality rates across sixths (from 14.5% to <1%). When assigned a point for each associated factor, the integer score’s discrimination was similar (c-statistic = 0.82) with good calibration across the patients with various risk profiles. The models’ performance was retained in the independent validation dataset. Promptly determining in-hospital mortality risks is achievable in the first few hours of presentation; they correlate strongly with mortality among AHF patients, potentially facilitating clinical decision-making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document