scholarly journals Baltic Sea ecosystem response to various nutrient load scenarios in present and future climates

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 3369-3387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Saraiva ◽  
H. E. Markus Meier ◽  
Helén Andersson ◽  
Anders Höglund ◽  
Christian Dieterich ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1167-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. E. M. Meier ◽  
K. Eilola ◽  
E. Almroth-Rosell ◽  
S. Schimanke ◽  
M. Kniebusch ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jari Koskiaho ◽  
Tomasz Okruszko ◽  
Mikolaj Piniewski ◽  
Pawel Marcinkowski ◽  
Sirkka Tattari ◽  
...  

Limnologica ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günther Nausch ◽  
Dietwart Nehring ◽  
Gunni Aertebjerg

Author(s):  
Aleksandr Briukhanov ◽  
Alexey Dorokhov ◽  
Ekaterina Shalavina ◽  
Alexey Trifanov ◽  
Ekaterina Vorobyeva ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
H.E. Markus Meier ◽  
Sofia Saraiva

In this article, the concepts and background of regional climate modeling of the future Baltic Sea are summarized and state-of-the-art projections, climate change impact studies, and challenges are discussed. The focus is on projected oceanographic changes in future climate. However, as these changes may have a significant impact on biogeochemical cycling, nutrient load scenario simulations in future climates are briefly discussed as well. The Baltic Sea is special compared to other coastal seas as it is a tideless, semi-enclosed sea with large freshwater and nutrient supply from a partly heavily populated catchment area and a long response time of about 30 years, and as it is, in the early 21st century, warming faster than any other coastal sea in the world. Hence, policymakers request the development of nutrient load abatement strategies in future climate. For this purpose, large ensembles of coupled climate–environmental scenario simulations based upon high-resolution circulation models were developed to estimate changes in water temperature, salinity, sea-ice cover, sea level, oxygen, nutrient, and phytoplankton concentrations, and water transparency, together with uncertainty ranges. Uncertainties in scenario simulations of the Baltic Sea are considerable. Sources of uncertainties are global and regional climate model biases, natural variability, and unknown greenhouse gas emission and nutrient load scenarios. Unknown early 21st-century and future bioavailable nutrient loads from land and atmosphere and the experimental setup of the dynamical downscaling technique are perhaps the largest sources of uncertainties for marine biogeochemistry projections. The high uncertainties might potentially be reducible through investments in new multi-model ensemble simulations that are built on better experimental setups, improved models, and more plausible nutrient loads. The development of community models for the Baltic Sea region with improved performance and common coordinated experiments of scenario simulations is recommended.


Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2679
Author(s):  
Ing-Marie Gren ◽  
Wondmagegn Tirkaso

An ecosystem-based management of a large sea can give heterogeneous nutrient load targets for different parts of the sea. Cost effective solutions to heterogeneous nutrient reductions targets based on ecological conditions are compared with the same overall nutrient reductions to the Baltic Sea. To this end, a numerical programming model is used, which includes eight different nutrient abatement measures (fertilizer and livestock reduction, cultivation of catch crops, reduced airborne nitrogen emissions, improved cleaning at sewage treatment plants, construction of wetlands and buffer strips, and mussel farming) in 21 catchments of the Baltic Sea. The results indicate that the cost for the international agreement on maximum load targets to different marine basins amounts to 5.3 billion euro. This is more than twice as large as the cost for the same total nutrient load targets to the Baltic Sea without specific targets for the marine basins. However, the resulting nutrient loads to the different marine basins deviate from the basin targets where the loads are lower for some basins but can exceed that for one basin, Baltic Proper, by approximately 22 per cent. Whether or not the ecological costs and benefits from deviations in basin targets under the Baltic Sea targets exceed the excess abatement cost of 2.9 billion euro for achieving the marine basin targets remains to be verified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document