Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity after MRI assessment and adjuvant treatment in 189 patients undergoing rectal cancer resection

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 585-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. Simpson ◽  
N. Eardley ◽  
F. McNicol ◽  
P. Healey ◽  
M. Hughes ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 1876-1881
Author(s):  
Adam Truong ◽  
Nicole Lopez ◽  
Phillip Fleshner ◽  
Karen Zaghiyan

Open resection remains the standard of care in the surgical management of rectal cancer with recent studies unable to prove noninferiority of laparoscopic resection. Few studies directly compare robotic versus open techniques. This is a retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients undergoing robotic or open rectal cancer resection during a three-year period. The primary endpoint was a composite of complete mesorectal excision, circumferential resection margin <1 mm, and distal resection margin <1 mm. The study cohort included 64 patients undergoing robotic (n = 28) or open (n = 36) resection. Successful surgical resection was similar between the robotic (75%) and open (76%) approaches. Robotic resection was associated with significantly lower blood loss ( P = 0.02) and significantly longer operative times ( P = 0.009) compared with open resection. Length of hospital stay and complications were similar between groups. Both male gender ( P = 0.03) and shorter tumor distance from the anal verge ( P = 0.01) were predictors for unsuccessful surgical resection in open, but not robotic, surgery. Pathologic outcomes are similar between robotic and open rectal cancer resection, even early in the learning curve. Tumor distance from the anal verge complicates open total mesorectal excision; however, robotic surgery is less impacted. Robotic resection may be a promising minimally invasive approach for rectal cancer resection.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Henry Ptok ◽  
Frank Meyer ◽  
Ingo Gastinger ◽  
Benjamin Garlipp

<b><i>Background/Aim:</i></b> Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) in rectal cancer is associated with significant long-term morbidity. It is unclear whether nCRT in resectable mesorectal fascia circumferential resection margin (mrCRM)-negative rectal cancer treated by adequate total mesorectal excision (TME) is beneficial. The aim was to determine if nCRT can be omitted in patients with MRI-assessed cT3 rectal cancer and a negative mrCRM undergoing good-quality TME. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> By means of a prospective nationwide registry (<i>n</i> = 43.147; prospective multi-center observational study), patients with cT3 rectal cancer &#x3c;12 cm from the anal verge with a negative (&#x3e;1 mm) MRI-assessed CRM undergoing radical resection from 2006 to 2008 were selected. Overall, 87 patients were available for the final analysis (TME-alone, <i>n</i> = 25; nCRT+TME, <i>n</i> = 62). Groups were balanced for age, sex, and ASA score, with a nonsignificant predominance of males in the nCRT+TME group. As main outcome measures, local and distant recurrence rates were compared between patients undergoing primary surgery (TME-alone) vs. neoadjuvant chemoradiation + surgery (nCRT+TME). <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the TME-alone group, tumors were located closer to the anal verge (<i>p</i> = 0.018) and demonstrated a smaller minimal circumferential distance from the resection margin (<i>p</i> = 0.036). TME quality was comparable, as was median follow-up (48.9 vs. 44.9 months; <i>p</i> = 0.268). Local recurrences occurred at a similar rate in the TME-alone (<i>n</i> = 1; 5.3%) and nCRT+TME groups (<i>n</i> = 3; 5.5%) (<i>p</i> = 0.994) and were diagnosed at 10 months (TME-alone) and at 8, 13, and 18 months (nCRT+TME). Distant recurrences occurred in 28.9 and 17.4% of the cases, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.626). The analysis was limited to cT3 cancers with a negative mrCRM. In addition, caution is required when appraising these results because of the limited number of evaluable subjects (especially in the TME-alone group), which adds some uncertainty to the statistical analysis. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this cohort of patients with rectal cancer located &#x3c;12 cm from the anal verge and a negative mrCRM undergoing adequate TME, omission of nCRT had no impact onto the local recurrence rate.


2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-69
Author(s):  
Toshihisa TAMURA ◽  
Aiichiro HIGURE ◽  
Naoki NAGATA ◽  
Keiji HIRATA ◽  
Yoshifumi NAKAYAMA ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 405-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Hallet ◽  
Alexandre Bouchard ◽  
Sébastien Drolet ◽  
Hélène Milot ◽  
Emilie Desrosiers ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahtab Zanguie ◽  
Abbas Abdollahi ◽  
Roham Salek ◽  
Ali Jangjoo ◽  
Mehdi Jabbari Nooghabi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document