Colorectal cancer screening by colonoscopy and trends in disease-specific mortality: a population-based ecological study of 358 German districts

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Hübner ◽  
Philip Lewin ◽  
Ron Pritzkuleit ◽  
Nora Eisemann ◽  
Werner Maier ◽  
...  
Diabetologia ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 2163-2172 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. V. van de Poll-Franse ◽  
H. R. Haak ◽  
J. W. W. Coebergh ◽  
M. L. G. Janssen-Heijnen ◽  
V. E. P. P. Lemmens

2021 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 106597
Author(s):  
Grace Hsiao-Hsuan Jen ◽  
Amy Ming-Fang Yen ◽  
Chen-Yang Hsu ◽  
Han-Mo Chiu ◽  
Sam Li-Sheng Chen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 106420
Author(s):  
Nuria Vives ◽  
Núria Milà ◽  
Gemma Binefa ◽  
Noemie Travier ◽  
Albert Farre ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 124 (9) ◽  
pp. 1516-1523
Author(s):  
Lindy M. Kregting ◽  
Sylvia Kaljouw ◽  
Lucie de Jonge ◽  
Erik E. L. Jansen ◽  
Elleke F. P. Peterse ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Many breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening programmes were disrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to estimate the effects of five restart strategies after the disruption on required screening capacity and cancer burden. Methods Microsimulation models simulated five restart strategies for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The models estimated required screening capacity, cancer incidence, and cancer-specific mortality after a disruption of 6 months. The restart strategies varied in whether screens were caught up or not and, if so, immediately or delayed, and whether the upper age limit was increased. Results The disruption in screening programmes without catch-up of missed screens led to an increase of 2.0, 0.3, and 2.5 cancer deaths per 100 000 individuals in 10 years in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Immediately catching-up missed screens minimised the impact of the disruption but required a surge in screening capacity. Delaying screening, but still offering all screening rounds gave the best balance between required capacity, incidence, and mortality. Conclusions Strategies with the smallest loss in health effects were also the most burdensome for the screening organisations. Which strategy is preferred depends on the organisation and available capacity in a country.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela S. Sinicrope ◽  
Ellen L. Goode ◽  
Paul J. Limburg ◽  
Sally W. Vernon ◽  
Joseph B. Wick ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Saraste ◽  
Daniel J Öhman ◽  
Marika Sventelius ◽  
K Miriam Elfström ◽  
Johannes Blom ◽  
...  

Objectives To assess patterns and probabilities of participation in multiple rounds of colorectal cancer screening. Methods All individuals who were invited to participate in population-based colorectal cancer screening in the Stockholm-Gotland region in Sweden between 1 January 2008 and 30 September 2015 were included in the study. Guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing was used. All individuals invited to the three first consecutive screening rounds were included in the analysis. Results There were 346,168 individuals eligible for invitation to screening. The average participation rate during the follow-up period was 60%. Eligible individuals could be invited 1–4 times, depending on age at first invitation. Of 48,959 individuals invited to the three first consecutive rounds of screening, 71% participated at least once, and 50% participated in all three rounds. Participation at first invitation was a predictor for participation in subsequent rounds, and the likelihood of continuous participation following participation in the first round was 84%. Of those who attended the first and second rounds, 93% also participated in the third round. Similar patterns of consistency were seen among non-participants. For individuals not participating in the first screening round, the likelihood of consistent non-participation was 71. Conclusions Participation in the first round of screening is a strong predictor for participation in subsequent rounds. Therefore, reducing barriers for initial participation is a key for achieving consistent participation over several rounds in organized colorectal cancer screening programmes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 756-763
Author(s):  
Mariann RUTKA ◽  
Renáta BOR ◽  
Tamás MOLNÁR ◽  
Klaudia FARKAS ◽  
Daniella PIGNICZKI ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document