A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies evaluating provider, patient, and health care system-related barriers to diagnostic skin cancer examinations

Author(s):  
Maleka Najmi ◽  
Ashley E. Brown ◽  
Sarah R. Harrington ◽  
David Farris ◽  
Sarah Sepulveda ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (5) ◽  
pp. 569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyce M. Anderson ◽  
Martha Matsumoto ◽  
Melissa I. Saul ◽  
Aaron M. Secrest ◽  
Laura K. Ferris

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-709.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Matsumoto ◽  
Aaron Secrest ◽  
Alyce Anderson ◽  
Melissa I. Saul ◽  
Jonhan Ho ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 654-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somnath Saha ◽  
Michele Freeman ◽  
Joahd Toure ◽  
Kimberly M. Tippens ◽  
Christine Weeks ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Morisod ◽  
Xhyljeta Luta ◽  
Joachim Marti ◽  
Jacques Spycher ◽  
Mary Malebranche ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract Background : Achieving equity in health care remains a challenge for health care systems worldwide and marked inequities in access and quality of care persist. The performance assessment of health care systems is often limited to quality and efficiency indicators. Identifying indicators of health care equity is an important first step in integrating the concept of equity into assessments of health care system performance. Because emergency care serves as the interface between ambulatory and inpatient care, it is arguably an opportune setting in which to begin this process. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of administrative data-derived health care equity indicators and their association with socio-economic determinants of health (SEDH) in emergency care settings. Following PRISMA-Equity reporting guidelines, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies. The outcomes of interest were indicators of health care equity and the associated SEDH they examine. Results: Among 29 studies identified, 14 equity indicators were identified and grouped into four categories that reflect the patient emergency care pathway. Total emergency department (ED) visits and ambulatory care sensitive condition-related ED visits were the two most frequently used equity indicators. The studies analysed equity based on seven SEDH: social deprivation, income, education level, social class, insurance coverage, health literacy and financial and non-financial barriers. Despite some conflicting results, all identified SEDH are associated with inequalities in access to and use of emergency care. Conclusion: The use of administrative data-derived indicators in combination with identified SEDH could improve the measurement of health care equity in emergency care settings across health care systems worldwide. Using a combination of indicators is likely to lead to a more comprehensive, well-rounded measurement of health care equity than using any one indicator in isolation. Though studies analysed focused on emergency care settings, it seems possible to extrapolate these indicators to measure equity in other areas of the health care system. Further studies elucidating root causes of health inequities in and outside the health care system are needed. .


2017 ◽  
Vol 153 (8) ◽  
pp. 797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Swetter ◽  
Julia Chang ◽  
Amanda R. Shaub ◽  
Martin A. Weinstock ◽  
Eleanor T. Lewis ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Goran Videnović ◽  
Ilija Tripković ◽  
Dragan Krasić ◽  
Goran Bjelogrlić ◽  
Bojana Videnović

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 401-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Abbas Mirabedini ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Esmaeil Fazl Hashemi ◽  
Ali Sarabi Asiabar ◽  
Aziz Rezapour ◽  
Saber Azami-Aghdash ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 100-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grigorios Karageorgos ◽  
Ioannis Andreadis ◽  
Konstantinos Psychas ◽  
George Mourkousis ◽  
Asimina Kiourti ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeana M Holt

The National Academy of Medicine’s (NAM) vision for 21st-century health care underscored the need for increased patient engagement and charged health-care researchers to develop tools to evaluate patient experience. The most widely studied patient experience tools are the Consumer Assessments of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys. The Clinician and Group (CG)-CAHPS survey is the preferred patient experience survey for primary care, and thus a systematic review of patient reports from the CG-CAHPS empirical literature is ideal to appreciate the voice of health-care consumers. This systematic review revealed patient subjective reports regarding the acceptability of health-care delivery models, the effectiveness of interventions, the timeliness of care in different practice climates, and their responses to quality improvement initiatives. The synthesized results inform clinicians, organizations, and the health-care system where to prioritize and how to adapt services to efficiently provide equitable care, achieving the NAM’s vision for a patient-centered US health-care system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document