The relationship between post-diagnostic statin usage and breast cancer prognosis varies by hormone receptor phenotype: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Wen-Huan Xu ◽  
Yun-Hai Zhou
BMC Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhigang Zhang ◽  
Chao Ni ◽  
Wuzhen Chen ◽  
Ping Wu ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 725-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong-peng Xu ◽  
Hua Shen ◽  
Ling-xiang Liu ◽  
Yong-qian Shu

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21606-e21606
Author(s):  
Binliang Liu ◽  
Zongbi Yi ◽  
Xiuwen Guan ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Yi-Xin Zeng

e21606 Background:Breast cancer is the most common cancer in females. The effects of statins on breast cancer prognosis have long been controversial, so it is important to investigate the relationship between statin type, exposure time, and breast cancer prognosis. This study sought to explore the effect of statins on breast cancer prognosis. Methods:We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library between October 15, 2016 and January 20, 2017. Searches combined the terms “breast neoplasms[MeSH]”, “statins”, “prognosis” or “survival” or “mortality” with no limit on publication date. Data were analyzed using Stata/SE 11.0. Results: 7 studies finally met the selection criteria and 197,048 included women. Overall statin use was associated with lower cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.92, P = 0.000 and HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.89, P = 0.000). Lipophilic statins were associated with decreased breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.70, P = 0.000 and HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.69, P = 0.000); however, hydrophilic statins were weakly protective against only all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97, P = 0.132) and not breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.76-1.17, P = 0.174). Of note, more than four years of follow-up did not show a significant correlation between statin use and cancer-specific mortality or all-cause mortality (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-1.00, P = 0.616 and HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.75-1.19, P = 0.181), while groups with less than four years of follow-up still showed the protective effect of statins against cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87, P = 0.000 and HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.80, P = 0.000). Conclusions:Although statins can reduce breast cancer patient mortality, the benefit appears to be constrained by statin type and follow-up time. Lipophilic statins showed a strong protective function in breast cancer patients, while hydrophilic statins only slightly improved all-cause mortality. Finally, the protective effect of statins could only be observed in groups with less than four years of follow-up.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (21) ◽  
pp. 3716-3720
Author(s):  
Indri Windarti ◽  
Wirsma Arif Harahap ◽  
Ricvan Dana Nindrea ◽  
Eti Yerizel ◽  
Primaria Dewi Rustamadji

AIM: This study aims to determine the prognostic significance of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss in breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis study. Sample of this study were research articles that evaluated PTEN loss and prognosis in breast cancer patients. We searched for relevant studies published in PubMed and Proquest from January 2010 to July 2018. We reviewed studies that examined the association between immunohistochemical expression of PTEN and breast cancer prognosis using meta-analysis methods. Pooled risk ratios (RR) were calculated using fixed and random-effect models. Data were processed using Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan 5.3). RESULTS: There were 7 studies conducted a systematic review then continued to evaluate the association of PTEN loss and breast cancer prognosis by meta-analysis. There was a significant association of PTEN loss with poor prognosis of breast cancer (RR = 0.76 [95% CI 0.59-0.98 p <0.07), and there was not any significant publication bias for studies included. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed PTEN loss is an important independent factor for breast cancer prognosis.


Breast Cancer ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dechun Liu ◽  
Yanbin Chen ◽  
Miao Deng ◽  
Gangqiang Xie ◽  
Jianguang Wang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592092783
Author(s):  
Junho Kang ◽  
Yeuni Yu ◽  
Seongdo Jeong ◽  
Hansong Lee ◽  
Hye Jin Heo ◽  
...  

Background: High cathepsin D has been associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer; however, the results of many studies are controversial. Here, we assessed the association between high cathepsin D levels and worse breast cancer prognosis by conducting a meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was used to search relevant literature in PUBMED and EMBASE by September 2018. The meta-analysis was performed in Review Manager 5.3 using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 15,355 breast cancer patients from 26 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. Significant associations between elevated high cathepsin D and poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.35–1.92, p < 0.0001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.31–2.18, p < 0.001) were observed. In the subgroup analysis for DFS, high cathepsin D was significantly associated with poor prognosis in node-positive patients (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.25–1.71, p < 0.00001), node-negative patients (HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.39–2.27, p < 0.0001), early stage patients (HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.34–2.23, p < 0.0001), and treated with chemotherapy patients (HR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.21–2.12, p < 0.001). Interestingly, patients treated with tamoxifen had a low risk of relapse when their cathepsin D levels were high (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52–0.98, p = 0.04) and a high risk of relapse when their cathepsin D levels were low (HR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.22–1.85, p = 0.0001). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that high expression levels of cathepsin D are associated with a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Based on our subgroup analysis, we believe that cathepsin D can act as a marker for poor breast cancer prognosis and also as a therapeutic target for breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document