Usefulness of the dacryoscintigraphy in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction prior to endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 257 (7) ◽  
pp. 1535-1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Ju Kim ◽  
Sehyun Baek ◽  
Minwook Chang
Keyword(s):  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy

scholarly journals Successes rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy at KMC

1970 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Shrestha ◽  
PK Kafle ◽  
S Pokhrel ◽  
M Maharjan ◽  
KC Toran
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Symptomatic Relief ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Complete Cure ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Endoscopic Dcr ◽  
Sac Syringing

Background: Nasolacrimal duct obstruction is a common problem which can be corrected by dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). The gold standard treatment for this is DCR operation through an external approach. Development of endoscopic sinus surgery and endoscopic DCR performed through intranasal route is a major recent development in this field. Objectives: The aim of this study is to find out the success rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicon stent intubation within the period of six month following surgery. Materials and methods: A prospective study was done on 26 patients with obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct referred from eye out-patient department to ENT OPD during one year period from 2008 to 2009. All the cases had undergone endoscopic DCR operation which was regularly followed up for a period of six months. Postoperative patency of ostium was checked by sac syringing and endoscopic visualisation of ostium in the nasal cavity. The success of surgery was categorised as: complete cure, partial cure and no improvement depending upon symptomatic relief and clinical examination such as sac syringing and endoscopic examination following surgery. Result: In six months' follow-up, 22 (84.5%) out of 26 patients had achieved the complete cure and 4 patients (15.5%) continued to have persistent epiphora. Conclusion: Endoscopic DCR is a beneficial procedure for nasolacrimal duct obstruction with no external scar on face and less bleeding. The success rate is as good as external DCR. Key words: Nasolacrimal duct; Epiphora; Rigid nasal endoscope; Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v8i2.3557 Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2010), Vol. 8, No. 2, Issue 30, 195-198

A Case of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy for Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Secondary to Sarcoidosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 141 (0) ◽  
pp. 38-39
Author(s):  
Koji Otsuka ◽  
Masaaki Shimizu ◽  
Motoko Shibata ◽  
Yohei Okayoshi ◽  
Susumu Araki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy

scholarly journals Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction: an assessment of post-operative outcomes at a tertiary health care centre

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. K. L. N. Raju Dantuluri
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Drainage System ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Deviated Nasal Septum ◽  
Health Care Centre ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Operative Outcomes

Background: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (Endo DCR) is a well-established surgical treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) cases. Advances in surgical technique and a better understanding of the anatomy have resulted in improvement of the success rate. The objective of this study is to assess the factors responsible for the recurrence of nasolacrimal system obstruction by evaluating the post-operative outcomes of Endo DCR at a tertiary health care centre.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in the department of ENT, GVP IHC and MT, Visakhapatnam – Andhra Pradesh on 52 patients who underwent Endo DCR procedure from September 2018 to September 2021. The data regarding lacrimal drainage system, operative details, surgical outcomes and complications were analysed.Results: Fifty-two patients (18 male and 34 female) underwent 63 Endo DCR surgeries for NLDO. Success was achieved in 50 cases (79.4%), and failure in 13 (20.6%). Of the 13 failed cases, anatomical obstruction at the fistula site was found in 6 (46.2% of failed cases), whereas functional failure with no evidence of obstruction was found in 7 (53.8%).Conclusions: The success rate appears to be influenced by preoperative parameters like clinical as well as radiological examination of eye and nose; ruling out intraoperative conditions like sinusitis, deviated nasal septum, polyps. These are essential for better coordinating therapeutic expectations and better patient selection. Endo DCR proved to be a safe invasive procedure as it has direct approach to the sac and produced excellent results without any external scar.

scholarly journals Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: our experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyothi A.C. ◽  
Ajay Kumar ◽  
Prawahar Chiluveru
Keyword(s):  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Lacrimal Sac ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Frontal Process

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The purpose of the study was to determine the outcome and safety of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (ENDO-DCR) with the use of silicon stents in nasolacrimal duct obstruction.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This study was done in the department of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery, Navodaya Medical College and Research Centre, Raichur, from January 2013 to June 2015, with a total of 82cases (10 cases with bilateral disease) underwent a standardized procedure, with an endonasal approach to the lacrimal sac, surgical removal of nasal mucosa, lacrimal bone, and a fragment of the frontal process of the maxilla. The medial wall of the lacrimal sac was removed completely and canalicular silicone intubation tube was placed for six weeks post operatively. Main outcome measures were resolution of epiphora, absence of discharge, and patency of the ostium confirmed by irrigation and endoscopic evaluation of neo osteum at 6 weeks.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results: </strong>The ENDO-DCR procedure with adjunctive canalicular silicon intubation tube was successful in 78 (95%) cases. No significant complications were encountered during or after operative period</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with canalicular silicon intubation for shorter duration (6 weeks) is a safe and successful procedure for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults as well as in children with a success rate of 95%.</p>

scholarly journals Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicon stent: our experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 785
Author(s):  
Neeraj Suri ◽  
Bhavya B. M.
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effective ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Endoscopic Dcr ◽  
Surgical Modality ◽  
External Dcr

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Dacryocystorhinostomy is the current surgical modality of treatment preferred for patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Both external and endonasal endoscopic approaches have been in practice with their own merits and demerits. Since the invention of endoscopes, endoscopic DCR is preferred for its scarless, minimally invasive technique and many modifications have been done over years like placement of silicon stents to reduce recurrence.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> In our study we evaluated 70 patients with epiphora with obstruction in nasolacrimal duct, Fresh cases and revision cases who had undergone either external and/ endoscopic DCR without stent were included. All patients underwent endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with silicon stent placement. Patients were followed postoperatively for a period of 6 months to 3 years.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The results were compared with that of external DCR and endoscopic DCR without stent. In our study we found that, endoscopic DCR with silicon stent had less chances of recurrence and synechiae formation. Results at 3 years follow up have been good with 95.7% patients relieved of symptoms completely.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Endoscopic DCR is a cost effective and a safe alternative for External DCR in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. We found that endoscopic DCR with stenting had several advantages over more conventional external approach.</p>

scholarly journals Bilateral Simultaneous Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: Outcome and Impact on the Quality of Life of the Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 191-195
Author(s):  
Islam R. Herzallah ◽  
Osama A. Marglani ◽  
Ameen Z. Alherabi ◽  
Nuha S. Faraj ◽  
Deemah H. Bukhari
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Symptom Score ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction Bilateral simultaneous endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (endo-DCR) has received little attention in the literature, thus many surgeons continue to address bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction at two stages, rather than in the same setting. Objective To evaluate the feasibility and the outcome of simultaneous bilateral Endo-DCR and its impact on the quality of life of the patients. Methods We have conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous endo-DCR between March 2013 and February 2017 at our tertiary care institution. The reviewed data included clinical presentation; operative details; success rate; pre and postoperative evaluation of the symptoms of the patients, using the Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Symptom Score Questionnaire; satisfaction of the patients, and improvement in the quality of life, assessed by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaire. Results Out of 128 cases in which endo-DCRs were performed, 13 were bilateral (26 sides). Postoperative success was documented in 24 of the 26 sides (92.3%), with a mean follow-up duration of 16.2 months. The two failed sides were reported in the same case. The preoperative symptom score ranged between 12 and 80 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 38.23 ± 15.7). The postoperative symptom score was significantly lower (mean ± SD: 5.4 ± 12.9). The success rates in unilateral and bilateral cases were comparable, with no statistically significant difference. A notable improvement in the quality of life of the patients was also reported, with a mean GBI score of 81.38 ± 12.37. Conclusion Our results support that a simultaneous bilateral endo-DCR is a safe procedure that offers a high success rate, spares the patient from the stress of a second surgery, provides the patient with a bilateral resolution of the symptoms, and confers an immediate improvement in the quality of life of the patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document