Intracorporeal stapled anastomosis following laparoscopic segmental gastrectomy for gastric cancer: technical report and surgical outcomes

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1774-1780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Woong Lee ◽  
George Bouras ◽  
Eiji Nomura ◽  
Ryoji Yoshinaka ◽  
Takaya Tokuhara ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koshi Kumagai ◽  
Naoki Hiki ◽  
Souya Nunobe ◽  
Sayuri Sekikawa ◽  
Takehiro Chiba ◽  
...  

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiguo Li ◽  
Yan Ma ◽  
Guiting Liu ◽  
Ming Fang ◽  
Yingwei Xue

Abstract Objective Proximal gastrectomy acts as a function-preserving operation for upper-third gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical outcomes between proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition reconstruction in upper-third gastric cancer. Methods A retrospective review of 301 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (JI) or gastric tube (GT) at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between June 2007 and December 2016 was performed. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Visick grade were used to evaluate postgastrectomy syndromes. Gastrointestinal fiberoscopy was used to evaluate the prevalence and severity of reflux esophagitis based on the Los Angeles (LA) classification system. Results The JI group had a longer operation time than the GT group (220 ± 52 vs 182 ± 50 min), but no significant difference in blood loss was noted. Compared to the GT group, the Visick grade and GSRS score were significantly higher. Reflux esophagitis was significantly increased in the GT group compared with the JI group. Conclusion Proximal gastrectomy is well tolerated with excellent short-term outcomes in patients with upper-third gastric cancer. Compared with GT construction, JI construction has clear functional advantages and may provide better quality of life for patients with upper-third gastric cancer.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Gyu Kim ◽  
Jeong Hwan Yook ◽  
Kap Choong Kim ◽  
Tae Hwan Kim ◽  
Hee Sung Kim ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 6971-6979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanzhe Zhong ◽  
Ao Leng ◽  
Shaohui He ◽  
Minglei Yang ◽  
Dan Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Makoto Hikage ◽  
Masanori Tokunaga ◽  
Rie Makuuchi ◽  
Yutaka Tanizawa ◽  
Etsuro Bando ◽  
...  

Objective Robot-assisted gastrectomy is increasingly used for the treatment of gastric cancer, although it remains a time-consuming procedure. An ultrasonically activated device might be useful to shorten operation times. This study therefore assessed the effect of ultrasonically activated device use on procedural times and on other early surgical outcomes. Methods Consecutive patients (N = 42) who underwent robot-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer were included. Clinicopathological characteristics and early surgical outcomes were compared between robotic-assisted gastrectomy procedures using an ultrasonically activated device (U group, n = 21) and those without it (NU group, n = 21). Results There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the groups; however, the median operation time was significantly less in the U group than in the NU group (291 vs 351 minutes, P = 0.006). In detail, the median duration of console time until dividing the duodenum was less in the U group (70 vs 102 minutes, P < 0.001). Estimated blood loss, incidence of postoperative morbidity, and duration of postoperative hospital stay were not different between the groups. Conclusions An ultrasonically activated device reduced the operation time of robot-assisted gastrectomy without increasing blood loss and morbidity.


2011 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 534-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Saito ◽  
Kyoichi Kihara ◽  
Hirohiko Kuroda ◽  
Tomoyuki Matsunaga ◽  
Shigeru Tatebe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document