Impact of Surgical Margins on Overall Survival after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Validation of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Guidelines on a Western Series

Purpose No consensus exists on the resection extent needed to ensure oncological safety in gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). This study aims to assess the impact of margin adequacy according to Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) guidelines on overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods Patients who underwent surgery for stage I–III GAC at our institution between 2010 and 2017 were included. Margin adequacy according to JGCA, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines was assessed, and their predictive value on OS was evaluated with Harrell’s C-index. Patients were analyzed according to their margins’ adherence to JGCA guidelines, and a propensity score matching (PSM) was run. Indication to either total gastrectomy (TG) or distal gastrectomy (DG) according to each guideline was also assessed. Results A total of 279 patients were included, of whom 220 (79%) underwent DG. Adequate margins according to JGCA were obtained in 209 patients (75%). On multivariate analysis, JGCA margin adequacy was independently associated with OS, together with American Society of Anesthesiologist class, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, lymphadenectomy extent, R0 resection, and postoperative N stage. After PSM, patients with JGCA adequate margins showed better OS, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and local RFS than patients with JGCA inadequate margins. For 220 DG, JGCA guidelines would have recommended TG in 25 patients (11%), NCCN in 30 (14%), and ESMO in 90 (41%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Adequacy of surgical resection margins to JGCA guidelines leads to improved survival outcomes and allows for a more organ-preserving approach than Western guidelines.

Management of early gastric cancer meeting criteria for endoscopic resection: US population-based study

Background and study aims The goal of this study was to assess surgical resection (SR) of early gastric cancer (EGC) fitting Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) endoscopic resection (ER) criteria. Patients and methods We analyzed EGC data from the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Results A total of 2219 EGC cases were identified (1074 T1a and 1145 T1b). Of them, 409 met absolute criteria, 219 met expanded 1, 529 expanded 2, and 229 expanded 3. 259 lesions were treated endoscopically while 1007 were surgically resected (20.5 % vs 79.5 %, P = 0.0001). Temporal analysis showed that the frequency of ER steadily increased while SR proportionally decreased during the study period. Cox proportion regression analysis adjusting for confound variables (including age, gender, and race) showed no significant difference in the risk of mortality following either surgery or endoscopy. Conclusions EGC can be safely treated with ER. However, EGC meeting JGCA ER criteria is largely treated with SR in the United States.

Bibliometric Evaluation of Publications (2000-2020) on the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer

Background: Gastric cancer remains a global malignancy. The role of bibliometric analysis is increasingly valued. It is feasible and necessary to perform a bibliometric analysis to regurgitate studies in the prognosis of gastric cancer. Materials and methods: Web of Science was selected for the dataset resource. Articles published between 2000 and 2020 within the database of Web of Science Core Collection were included with predefined search terms. CiteSpace version 5.7.R1 and R software program version 4.0.3 were used for bibliometric analysis with parameters extrapolated from included studies. Results: A total of 1721 articles were included from 2000 to 2020 with remarkably increasing trends. China (n=1183), Japan (n=218), and South Korea (n=119) showed the most publications. SUN YAT SEN University, FUDAN University, and NANJING MED University were the top institutions with most publications. Keywords with strongest citation bursts between 2000 and 2020 were characterized. Particularly, “statistics”, “resistance”, “mortality”, “lncrna”, “diagnosis”, “outcome”, “migration”, “promote,” and “regulatory t cell” were the latest rising keywords since 2017, indicating possible study trends ahead. Several articles showed strongest citation bursts, including Jemal A. CA-CANCER J CLIN, Van Cutsem E. LANCET, and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association GASTRIC CANCER. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis provides a thought-provoking, insightful result concerning the trajectory of research development in prognosis of gastric cancer with a future perspective.

Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer with D2 Lymphadenectomy: Experience with more than 500 Cases at Military Hospital, Vietnam

BACKGROUND: Among the less invasive operations noted in recent years, laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer has become popular because of advances in surgical techniques. We have performed LG with D2 lymphadenectomy for 515 cases of gastric cancer between April 2009 and November 2019 at military hospital 103. AIM: We aimed to presented the techniques and results of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) for gastric cancer. METHODS: Of the 515 gastric malignancy cases, distal gastrectomy was performed in 402 cases, proximal gastrectomy in 37 cases, and total gastrectomy in 76 cases. In all the cases, D2 lymph node dissection was performed according to the general rule of the Japanese gastric cancer association 3rd. RESULTS: Quicker recovery was observed in the LG cases than in the open cases. The post-operative complications with this technique were within a permissible range. There was a statistical difference that was seen in the survival outcomes after LAG for gastric cancer between the laparoscopic-assisted distant, proximal, and total gastrectomy. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic technique is not only less invasive but also relatively safe and curative compared with open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Surrogate indicators of survival in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer in JCOG0501.

381 Background: Pathological response rate (pRR) is a common endpoint for assessing the efficacy of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). We performed supplementary analysis to investigate if pRR can be a surrogate endpoint using data from JCOG0501. Methods: Patients with type 4 and large type 3 resectable GC were randomized either surgery plus adjuvant S-1 (arm A) or NAC (S-1 plus cisplatin) plus surgery plus S-1 (arm B) in JCOG0501. Histological type (sig vs non-sig) was evaluated using preoperative biopsy specimen. Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to assess the effects of covariates for overall survival (OS). Pathological response was defined as Grade1b-3 according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association grading. Results: Among 286 (147 in arm A and 139 in arm B) patients who underwent surgery, 132 patients with complete pathological data in arm B were evaluated. Macroscopic tumor response (PR) was observed in 47 patients (36%) and pathological response (Grade 0/1a/1b/2/3) was 15/40/30/44/3, respectively. As shown in the table, pathological response was significantly better OS after adjusting other factors (HR, 0.51 [95% CI 0.30-0.87], p = 0.014). Conclusions: pRR may be used as a surrogate endpoint for future clinical trials in type 4 and large type 3 GC. Clinical trial information: C000000279. [Table: see text]