A prospective study comparing three-port video-assisted thoracoscopy with the single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port and instruments for the video thoracoscopic approach: a pilot study

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 2557-2560 ◽  
Author(s):  
José M. Mier ◽  
Abraham Chavarin ◽  
Cristina Izquierdo-Vidal ◽  
Juan J. Fibla ◽  
Laureano Molins
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Thoracoscopic Approach ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Sils Port ◽  
A Prospective Study

scholarly journals Single incision multiport laparoscopic appendectomy using a 2 mm alligator forceps: our experience of 60 cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 2714
Author(s):  
Srikant Patro ◽  
Ashish K. Sahoo ◽  
Nikhil Muduli ◽  
Ashish K. Mishra ◽  
Tapan Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
A Prospective Study

Single incision laparoscopic surgery is an emerging branch of minimally assess surgery to reduce scar and post-operative pain. Appendicitis is a common general surgical problem encountered in day to day practice. Different methods of appendectomy have been described by different surgeons from open to laparoscopic and now single incision laparoscopic surgery has been practised. This is a prospective study carried out in our Department of General Surgery SCB Medical College, Cuttack from February 2019 to March 2020; 60 patients had undergone the procedure and the results are published noted under headings of post-operative pain at (6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours), post-operative requirement of analgesia (diclofenac) at (6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours), operative time, days to resume bowel activity, days of hospital stay, post-operative complication in accordance to Clavien-Dindo classification.

Introduction of the single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port device

ASVIDE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 352-352
Author(s):  
Benedetta Bedetti ◽  
Pierfiorgio Solli ◽  
David Lawrence ◽  
Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos ◽  
Martin Hayward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Sils Port ◽  
Port Device

Cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery with a new SILS port

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 688-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Ito ◽  
Yukio Asano ◽  
Akihiko Horiguchi ◽  
Tomohiro Shimizu ◽  
Toshiyuki Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Sils Port

A Remarkably Easy Knot-Tying Technique for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery with the SILS Port for Gynecologic Diseases

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Endo ◽  
Kunihiko Nagasawa ◽  
Kota Umemura ◽  
Tsuyoshi Baba ◽  
Hirofumi Henmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Knot Tying ◽  
Sils Port ◽  
Knot Tying Technique

Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Is Associated with Poorer Performance and Increased Surgeon Workload Compared with Standard Laparoscopy

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul N. Montero ◽  
Christina E. Acker ◽  
B. Todd Heniford ◽  
Dimitrios Stefanidis
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Random Order ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Operating Room Efficiency ◽  
Task Load ◽  
Laparoscopic Instruments ◽  
Standard Laparoscopy ◽  
Sils Port ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Little is known about the effectiveness and challenges of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). We hypothesized that SILS would lead to decreased performance and increased surgeon workload compared with standard laparoscopy and that the use of angulated instruments during SILS would be beneficial. General surgery residents and fellows (n = 14) voluntarily performed the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery task 1 (peg transfer) using 1) standard laparoscopic instruments and port position, 2) standard laparoscopic instruments through a SILS port, and 3) angulated instruments through a SILS port in random order. Performance was assessed with an objective score and participant workload using a modified National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA TLX) workload assessment questionnaire. Participant performance was best with standard laparoscopy followed by SILS with angulated graspers and SILS with straight instruments (scores 218 ± 26 vs 131 ± 61 vs 91 ± 57; P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, participants indicated that standard laparoscopy was easier than SILS and their workload was 35 to 53 per cent higher when performing SILS. SILS was associated with decreased performance and increased surgeon workload compared with standard laparoscopy during the performance of a simulated task. SILS performance improved when angulated instruments were used but remained inferior to standard laparoscopy. This may translate into poorer operating room efficiency and safety.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document