Improving event-based rainfall-runoff simulation using an ensemble artificial neural network based hybrid data-driven model

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1345-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangyuan Kan ◽  
Cheng Yao ◽  
Qiaoling Li ◽  
Zhijia Li ◽  
Zhongbo Yu ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 1295-1304
Author(s):  
C. Sezen ◽  
T. Partal

Abstract Data-driven models and conceptual models have been utilized in an attempt to perform rainfall–runoff modelling. The aim of this study is comparing the performance of an artificial neural network (ANN) model, wavelet-based artificial neural network (WANN) model and GR4J lumped daily conceptual model for rainfall–runoff modelling of two rivers in the USA. It was obtained that the performance of the data-driven models (ANN, WANN) is better than the GR4J model especially when streamflow data the preceding day (Qt-1) and streamflow data the preceding two days (Qt-2) are used as input data in the ANN and WANN models for the simulation of low and high flows, in particular. On the other hand, when only precipitation and potential evapotranspiration data are used as input variables, the GR4J model performs better than the data-driven models.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 603-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-rui Dong ◽  
Chui-yong Zheng ◽  
Guang-yuan Kan ◽  
Min Zhao ◽  
Jie Wen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 2519-2534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangyuan Kan ◽  
Jiren Li ◽  
Xingnan Zhang ◽  
Liuqian Ding ◽  
Xiaoyan He ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 1755-1767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Chen ◽  
Vijay P. Singh ◽  
Shenglian Guo ◽  
Jianzhong Zhou ◽  
Lei Ye

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1325-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. P. Sudheer ◽  
A. K. Gosain ◽  
K. S. Ramasastri

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 091101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikita Frolov ◽  
Vladimir Maksimenko ◽  
Annika Lüttjohann ◽  
Alexey Koronovskii ◽  
Alexander Hramov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document