The current status of palliative care teams in Japanese University Hospitals: a nationwide questionnaire survey

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 801-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsunori Miyashita ◽  
Shigehito Nishida ◽  
Yurie Koyama ◽  
Rieko Kimura ◽  
Tomoyo Sasahara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Current Status ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Japanese University ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

Mobile Palliative Care Teams Hit the Road

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
PATRICE WENDLING
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
The Road ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

Hospitals See Spike in Palliative Care Teams

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
FRANCES CORREA
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

scholarly journals Scalable Model for Delivery of Inpatient Palliative Care During a Pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110057
Author(s):  
Ebru Kaya ◽  
Warren Lewin ◽  
David Frost ◽  
Breffni Hannon ◽  
Camilla Zimmermann
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Consultation Service ◽  
General Internal ◽  
Virtual Care ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Embedded Model ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Care Capacity

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals worldwide have reported large volumes of patients with refractory symptoms and a large number of deaths attributable to COVID-19. This has led to an increase in the demand for palliative care beyond what can be provided by most existing programs. We developed a scalable model to enable continued provision of high-quality palliative care during a pandemic for hospitals without a palliative care unit or existing dedicated palliative care beds. Methods: A COVID-19 consultation service working group (CWG) was convened with stakeholders from palliative care, emergency medicine, critical care, and general internal medicine. The CWG connected with local palliative care teams to ensure a coordinated response, and developed a model to ensure high-quality palliative care provision. Results: Our 3-step scalable model included: (1) consultant model enhanced by virtual care; (2) embedded model; and (3) cohorted end-of-life unit for COVID-19 positive patients. This approach was enabled through tools and resources to ensure specialist palliative care capacity and rapid upskilling of all clinicians to deliver basic palliative care. Enabling tools and resources included a triage tool for in-person versus virtual care, new medication order sets and guidelines to facilitate prescribing for common symptoms, and lead advance care planning and goals of care discussions. A redeployment plan of generalist physicians and psychiatrists was created to ensure seamless provision of serious illness care. Conclusion: This 3-step, scalable approach enables rapid upscaling of palliative care in collaboration with generalist physicians, and may be adapted for future pandemics or natural disasters.

scholarly journals Paediatric palliative screening scale as a useful tool for clinicians’ assessment of palliative care needs of pediatric patients: a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
In Gyu Song ◽  
Seung Yeon Kwon ◽  
Yoon Jung Chang ◽  
Min Sun Kim ◽  
Sung Hoon Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Pediatric Palliative Care ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Primary Care Clinicians ◽  
Palliative Care Needs ◽  
Screening Scale

Abstract Background Although the importance of palliative care in pediatric patients has been emphasized, many health care providers have difficulty determining when patients should be referred to the palliative care team. The Paediatric Palliative Screening Scale (PaPaS) was developed as a tool for screening pediatric patients for palliative care needs. The study aimed to evaluate the PaPaS as a reliable tool for primary care clinicians unfamiliar with palliative care. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients referred to the pediatric palliative care teams in two tertiary hospitals in the Republic of Korea between July 2018 and October 2019. Results The primary clinical and pediatric palliative care teams assessed the PaPaS scores of 109 patients, and both teams reported a good agreement for the sum of the PaPaS score. Furthermore, the PaPaS scores correlated with those obtained using the Lansky performance scale. Although the mean PaPaS score was higher in the pediatric palliative care team, the scores were higher than the cut-off score for referral in both groups. Conclusion The PaPaS can be a useful tool for primary care clinicians to assess the palliative care needs of patients and their families.

Help Me Understand: Providing Palliative Care to Individuals With Serious Mental Illness

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110107
Author(s):  
Kate L. M. Hinrichs ◽  
Cindy B. Woolverton ◽  
Jordana L. Meyerson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Psychosocial Support ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Case Examples ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) have shortened life expectancy with increased risk of developing comorbid medical illnesses. They might have difficulty accessing care and can be lost to follow-up due to complex socioeconomic factors, placing them at greater risk of dying from chronic or undiagnosed conditions. This, in combination with stigma associated with SMI, can result in lower quality end-of-life care. Interdisciplinary palliative care teams are in a unique position to lend assistance to those with SMI given their expertise in serious illness communication, values-based care, and psychosocial support. However, palliative care teams might be unfamiliar with the hallmark features of the various SMI diagnoses. Consequently, recognizing and managing exacerbations of SMI while delivering concurrent palliative or end-of-life care can feel challenging. The goal of this narrative review is to describe the benefits of providing palliative care to individuals with SMI with concrete suggestions for communication and use of recovery-oriented language in the treatment of individuals with SMI. The salient features of 3 SMI diagnoses—Bipolar Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, and Schizophrenia—are outlined through case examples. Recommendations for working with individuals who have SMI and other life-limiting illness are provided, including strategies to effectively manage SMI exacerbations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document