scholarly journals Loads on a spinal implant measured in vivo during whole-body vibration

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1129-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonius Rohlmann ◽  
Barbara Hinz ◽  
Ralph Blüthner ◽  
Friedmar Graichen ◽  
Georg Bergmann
Author(s):  
Nicolas V. Jaumard ◽  
Hassam A. Baig ◽  
Benjamin B. Guarino ◽  
Beth A. Winkelstein

Whole body vibration (WBV) can induce a host of pathologies, including muscle fatigue and neck and low back pain [1,2]. A new model of WBV in the rat has been developed to define relationships between WBV exposures, kinematics, and behavioral sensitivity (i.e. pain) [3]. Although in vivo studies provide valuable associations between biomechanics and physiology, they are not able to fully define the mechanical loading of specific spinal regions and/or the tissues that may undergo injurious loading or deformation. Mathematical models of seated humans and primates have been used to estimate spinal loads and design measures that mitigate them during WBV [4–6]. Although such models provide estimates of relative spinal motions, they have limited utility for relating potentially pathological effects of vibration-induced kinematics and kinetics since those models do not enable simultaneous evaluation of relevant spinal tissues with the potential for injury and pain generation. As such, the goal of this work was to develop and validate a three degree of freedom (3DOF) lumped-parameter model of the prone rat undergoing WBV directed along the long-axis of the spine. The model was constructed with dimensions of a generalized rat and model parameters optimized using kinematics over a range of frequencies. It was validated by comparing predicted and measured transmissibility and further used to predict spinal extension and compression, as well as acceleration, during WBV for frequencies known to produce resonance in the seated human and pain in the rat [3,7].


2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (16) ◽  
pp. 6423-6439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengyi Hu ◽  
Ian Welch ◽  
Xunhua Yuan ◽  
Steven I Pollmann ◽  
Hristo N Nikolov ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Folly Patterson ◽  
Raheleh Miralami ◽  
Keith E. Tansey ◽  
Raj K. Prabhu ◽  
Lauren B. Priddy

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 666-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonius Rohlmann ◽  
Hendrik Schmidt ◽  
Ulf Gast ◽  
Ines Kutzner ◽  
Philipp Damm ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P. Holsgrove ◽  
Martha E. Zeeman ◽  
William C. Welch ◽  
Beth A. Winkelstein

Abstract Occupational whole-body vibration (WBV) increases the risk of developing low back and neck pain; yet, there has also been an increased use of therapeutic WBV in recent years. Although the resonant frequency (fr) of the spine decreases as the exposure acceleration increases, effects of varying the vibration profile, including peak-to-peak displacement (sptp), root-mean-squared acceleration (arms), and frequency (f), on pain onset are not known. An established in vivo rat model of WBV was used to characterize the resonance of the spine using sinusoidal sweeps. The relationship between arms and fr was defined and implemented to assess behavioral sensitivity—a proxy for pain. Five groups were subjected to a single 30-min exposure, each with a different vibration profile, and a sham group underwent only anesthesia exposure. The behavioral sensitivity was assessed at baseline and for 7 days following WBV-exposure. Only WBV at 8 Hz induced behavioral sensitivity, and the higher arms exposure at 8 Hz led to a more robust pain response. These results suggest that the development of pain is frequency-dependent, but further research into the mechanisms leading to pain is warranted to fully understand which WBV profiles may be detrimental or beneficial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document