Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiograph, cone beam computed tomography, and intrasurgical linear measurement techniques for assessing furcation defects: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurul Ain Mohamed Yusof ◽  
Erni Noor ◽  
Nor Hidayah Reduwan ◽  
Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Linear Measurement ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Furcation Defects ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals A feasibility randomised controlled trial to evaluate the role of computed tomography in adults with atypical right iliac fossa pain

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (8) ◽  
pp. 546-551
Author(s):  
R Jones ◽  
D Olatunbode ◽  
J Dean ◽  
B Hall ◽  
D Harji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Iliac Fossa ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Right Iliac Fossa Pain ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background In patients with right iliac fossa pain, the need for surgery is largely determined by the likelihood of appendicitis. Patients often undergo ultrasound scanning despite a low diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a larger trial of computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with atypical right iliac fossa pain. Materials and methods A single-centre, unblinded, parallel randomised controlled trial of computed tomography in the assessment of patients with atypical right iliac fossa pain. After a retrospective evaluation, standard care was defined as serial examination with or without ultrasound. Atypical right iliac fossa pain was defined as no firm diagnosis after initial senior review. Simple descriptions of the risks and benefits of computed tomography were devised for patients to consider. Primary objectives were to assess feasibility and acceptability of the study procedures. Results A total of 71 patients were invited to participate and 68 were randomised. Final analysis included 31 participants in the standard care arm and 33 in the computed tomography arm, with comparable demographics. Computed tomography was associated with superior diagnostic accuracy, with 100% positive and negative predictive value. The proportion of scans that positively influenced management was 73% for computed tomography and 0% for ultrasound. In the computed tomography arm, there was a trend towards a shorter length of stay (2.3 vs 3.1 days) and a lower negative laparoscopy rate (2 of 11 vs 4 of 9). Conclusion A large randomised trial to evaluate the use of unenhanced computed tomography in atypical right iliac fossa pain appears feasible and justified.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in identification and postoperative evaluation of furcation defects

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhay Kolte ◽  
Natasha Pajnigara ◽  
Rajashri Kolte ◽  
Nilufer Pajnigara ◽  
Vrushali Lathiya
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Postoperative Evaluation ◽  
Furcation Defects

Effect of voxel size on detection of fenestration, dehiscence and furcation defects using cone-beam computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoumeh Eftekhar ◽  
Hanieh Kaviani ◽  
Nina Rouzmeh ◽  
Aitin Torabinia ◽  
Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Voxel Size ◽  
Furcation Defects

scholarly journals Cone beam computed tomography for detecting residual stones in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a randomized controlled trial (CAPTURE) protocol

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Kingma ◽  
I. J. de Jong ◽  
M. J. W. Greuter ◽  
S. Roemeling
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Total Study Population ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Free Status

Abstract Introduction Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard surgical treatment method for large kidney stones. Its aim is to achieve a stone-free status, since any residual fragments (RFs) after PCNL are likely to cause additional morbidity or stone growth. Enhancing intraoperative detectability of RFs could lead to increased stone-free rates and decreased re-intervention rates. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has recently been introduced in urology as a feasible method for intraoperatively imaging RFs. The aim of this trial is to determine the added value of CBCT in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, by measuring differences in stone-related morbidity for patients with procedures in which a CBCT is used versus patients with procedures without the use of CBCT. Methods The CAPTURE trial is an investigator-initiated single-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) in adult patients who have an indication for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotomy is performed. Once the surgeon is convinced of a stone-free status by means of fluoroscopy and nephroscopy, randomization allocates patients to either the study group in whom an intraoperative CBCT scan is performed or to the control group in whom no intraoperative CBCT scan is performed. The main endpoint is the stone-free status as assessed four weeks postoperatively by low-dose non-contrast abdominal CT, as a standard follow-up procedure. Secondary endpoints include the number of PCNL procedures required and the number of stone-related events (SREs) registered. The total study population will consist of 320 patients that undergo PCNL and are eligible for randomization for an intraoperative CBCT scan. Discussion We deem a randomized controlled trial to be the most effective and reliable method to assess the efficacy of CBCT in PCNL. Though some bias may occur due to the impossibility of blinding the urologist at randomization, we estimate that the pragmatic nature of the study, standardized circumstances, and follow-up methods with pre-defined outcome measures will result in a high level of evidence. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) NL8168, ABR NL70728.042.19. Registered on 15 October 2019. Prospectively registered.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in detection of simulated mandibular condyle erosions

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nafiseh Nikkerdar ◽  
Shahriar Shahab ◽  
Maryam Goodarzi ◽  
Amin Golshah ◽  
SanazSharifi Shooshtari
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Mandibular Condyle ◽  
Cone Beam

Comparison of Three-Dimensional and Conventional Orthodontic Imaging Modalities for Localization of Impacted Maxillary Canines in Patients With Alveolar Cleft

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562094698
Author(s):  
Parviz Padisar ◽  
Maryam Tofangchiha ◽  
Behzad Salari ◽  
Sonia Oveisi
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Imaging Modalities ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Impacted Tooth ◽  
Alveolar Cleft ◽  
Adjacent Tooth ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms

Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify which diagnostic parameters related to impacted maxillary canines can be reliably detected by the conventional orthodontic radiographic modalities and which factors need to be assessed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Design: In this cross-sectional study, 8 orthodontists evaluated 7 parameters related to the position and anatomy of the impacted canines by means of 2-dimensional (2D) records. After 1 month, the same process was repeated by means of CBCT by the same clinicians. Setting: Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. Patients and Participants: Thirty-two patients with alveolar cleft and impacted maxillary canines who had CBCT scans, lateral cephalograms, and orthopantomographs as pretreatment records. Main Outcome Measure: The diagnostic accuracy of 2D and 3-dimensional (3D) radiographic modalities was compared with each other and also with the gold standard by 3 radiologists. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of 2D and 3D imaging modalities was not significantly different regarding the mesiodistal inclination of the impacted tooth ( P = .09), apex anatomy ( P = .10), and mesiodistal position of the apex ( P = .19). Cone-beam computed tomography had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional radiographic modalities regarding overlapping the adjacent tooth ( P = .001), labio–palatal and apico–coronal position of the crown tip, and root resorption of the adjacent tooth ( P = .01). Conclusion: The conventional orthodontic radiographic modalities were as accurate as CBCT for determination of impacted canine inclination, apex anatomy, and mesiodistal position of the apex. Cone-beam computed tomography showed higher diagnostic accuracy for other parameters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document