scholarly journals Accuracy of full-arch digitalization for partially edentulous jaws — a laboratory study on basis of coordinate-based data analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kontis Panagiotis ◽  
Güth Jan-Frederik ◽  
Keul Christine
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Reference Object ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Virtual Model ◽  
Intraoral Scanner ◽  
Model Situation ◽  
Dental Model ◽  
Kolmogorov Smirnov ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
Edentulous Jaws

Abstract Objectives To compare the accuracy (trueness and precision) of direct digitization of four different dental gap situation with two IOS (intraoral scanner). Materials and methods Four partially edentulous polyurethane mandible models were used: (1) A (46, 45, 44 missing), (2) B (45, 44, 34, 35 missing), (3) C (42, 41, 31, 32 missing), and (4) D (full dentition). On each model, the same reference object was fixed between the second molars of both quadrants. A dataset (REF) of the reference object was generated by a coordinate measuring machine. Each model situation was scanned by (1) OMN (Cerec AC Omnicam) and (2) PRI (Cerec Primescan AC) (n = 30). Datasets of all 8 test groups (N = 240) were analyzed using inspection software to determine the linear aberrations in the X-, Y-, Z-axes and angular deviations. Mann–Whitney U and two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests were used to detect differences for trueness and precision. Results PRI revealed higher trueness and precision in most of the measured parameters ($${\overrightarrow{V}}_{E}$$ V → E  120.95 to 175.01 μm, $$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$ V → E (x) − 58.50 to − 9.40 μm, $$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$ V → E (z) − 70.35 to 63.50 μm), while OMN showed higher trueness for $$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$ V → E  (y) regardless of model situation (− 104.90 to 34.55 μm). Model D revealed the highest trueness and precision in most of the measured parameters regardless of IOS ($$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$ V → E  120.95 to 195.74 μm, $$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$ V → E (x) − 9.40 to 66.75 μm,$$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$ V → E (y) − 14.55 to 51.50 μm, $$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$ V → E (z) 63.50 to 120.75 μm). Conclusions PRI demonstrated higher accuracy in the X- and Z-axes, while OMN depicted higher trueness in the Y-axis. For PRI, Model A revealed the highest distortion, while for OMN, Model B produced the largest aberrations in most parameters. Clinical relevance Current results suggest that both investigated IOS are sufficiently accurate for the manufacturing of tooth-borne restorations and orthodontic appliances. However, both hardware specifications of IOS and the presence of edentulous gaps in the dental model have an influence on the accuracy of the virtual model dataset.

Trueness and Precision of Three Different Scanners for Digitizing a Completely Edentulous Gypsum Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-95
Author(s):  
Ammar Kayssoun ◽  
A. Nehir Özden
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Intraoral Scanner ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Way Anova

Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the precision and trueness of three different scanners to scan a maxillary edentulous model using three-dimensional evaluation software. Materials and Methods: A coordinate measuring machine was used as the reference scanner. Cone beam computed tomography, computed tomography (CT), and an intraoral scanner were used to digitize an edentulous gypsum model. Data were collected and loaded into three-dimensional evaluation software. The scan outputs were superimposed, and the accuracy (trueness and precision) of the scanners were compared. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the accuracy values among all groups (trueness) and to determine differences within groups (precision). Statistical significance was assessed with an independent sample t-test (= 0.05) for each group. Results: The mean precision values ranged from 3.5 to –0.2 m. Analysis of the superimposed scans onto the reference scan for each group revealed no significant differences in trueness and precision (p > 0.05) among all groups. Further, binary comparisons of the datasets of each group revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05) in terms of precision values, except in the CT group wherein significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were observed for most models. Conclusions: No significant differences were observed in terms of accuracy (precision and trueness) among the three scanners. All scanners were effective in scanning the edentulous gypsum model.

scholarly journals Design of a Single-Tooth Model and Its Application in Oral Scan System Assessment

Scanning ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
HongXin Cai ◽  
Bing Cheng Zhao ◽  
Yueyi Tian ◽  
Dong-Hyuck Kim ◽  
Yunhan Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Model ◽  
Reference Model ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Intraoral Scanner ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Integration Model ◽  
Digital Impressions ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Important Position

Intraoral scanners have been widely used in the application of dentistry. Accuracy includes trueness and precision; they have an important position in the assessment of intraoral scanners. The existing standard models are divided into the inlay and the crown, but the operation is relatively complicated. In this study, in order to simplify the current standard model, we designed a new integration model to compare the accuracy of two intraoral scanners (CEREC and TRIOS) and an extraoral scanner (SHINING). The coordinate measuring machine measured value is the gold standard. Values of the length and angle were analyzed by converting the scanned digital impressions into an STL (standard triangulation language) format to evaluate the accuracy of the intraoral scanner and to verify the feasibility of the designed model. The result shows that the integration model can be successfully scanned and imaged. In the case of the powder-free integration model, intraoral scanner precision, trueness, 3D fitting, and imaging are better than the extraoral scanner. It can be seen straightly from the measurement result and the 3D fitting result that the intraoral scanner can acquire the shape of the standard model integrally with good repeatability. Therefore, it can be concluded that TRIOS is superior to CEREC and SHINING in accuracy, and the integration model is feasible as a reference in the examination of intraoral scanners. The performance of the newly designed integration model that can be scanned is clinically significant, suggesting that this model can be used as a standard reference model.

scholarly journals The system of measurement accuracy prediction, based on Coordinate Measuring Machine simulator and its virtual model

Mechanik ◽  
2016 ◽  
pp. 220-221
Author(s):  
Adam Gąska ◽  
Maciej Gruza ◽  
Piotr Gąska ◽  
Wiktor Harmatys ◽  
Jerzy Sładek
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Accuracy ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Virtual Model ◽  
Measuring Machine

scholarly journals Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of dental bridges manufactured with conventional casting technique and CAD/CAM system with Ceramill Sintron blocks using CMM

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Izadi ◽  
Fariborz Vafaee ◽  
Arash Shishehian ◽  
Ghodratollah Roshanaei ◽  
Behzad Fathi Afkari
Keyword(s):  
Reference Model ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Casting Technique ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Conventional Casting ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Milling Method ◽  
Measuring Machine

Background. Recently, non-presintered chromium-cobalt (Cr-Co) blocks with the commercial name of Ceramill Sintron were introduced to the market. However, comprehensive studies on the dimensional accuracy and fit of multi-unit frameworks made of these blocks using the coordinate measuring machine (CMM) are lacking. This study aimed to assess and compare the dimensional changes and fit of conventional casting and milled frameworks using Ceramill Sintron. Methods. A metal model was designed and scanned and 5-unit frameworks were fabricated using two techniques: (I) the conventional casting method (n=20): the wax model was designed, milled in the CAD/CAM machine, flasked and invested; (II) the milling method using Ceramill Sintron blocks (n=20): the wax patterns of group 1 were used; Ceramill Sintron blocks were milled and sintered. Measurements were made on the original reference model and the fabricated frameworks using the CMM in all the three spatial dimensions, and dimensional changes were recorded in a checklist. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and the two groups were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05). Results. The fabricated frameworks in both groups showed significant dimensional changes in all the three dimensions. Comparison of dimensional changes between the two groups revealed no significant differences (P>0.05) except for transverse changes (arch) that were significantly greater in Ceramill Sintron frameworks (P<0.05). Conclusion. The two manufacturing processes were the same regarding dimensional changes and the magnitude of marginal gaps and both processes resulted in significant dimensional changes in frameworks. Ceramill Sintron frameworks showed significantly greater transverse changes than the conventional frameworks.

scholarly journals The Influence of Automated Machining Strategy on Geometric Deviations of Machined Surfaces

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2353
Author(s):  
Ján Varga ◽  
Teodor Tóth ◽  
Peter Frankovský ◽  
Ľudmila Dulebová ◽  
Emil Spišák ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Surface Quality ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Geometric Tolerance ◽  
Geometric Tolerances ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Geometric Deviations ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
Overlap Parameter ◽  
Total Average

This paper deals with various automated milling strategies and their influence on the accuracy of produced parts. Among the most important factors for surface quality is the automated milling strategy. Milling strategies were generated from two different programs, CAM system SolidCAM, with the help of workshop programming in the control system Heidenhain TNC 426. In the first step, simulations of different toolpaths were conducted. Using geometric tolerance is becoming increasingly important in robotized production, but its proper application requires a deeper understanding. This article presents the measurement of selected planes of robotized production to evaluate their flatness, parallelism and perpendicularity deviations after milling on the coordinate measuring machine Carl Zeiss Contura G2. Total average deviations, including all geometric tolerances, were 0.020 mm for SolidCAM and 0.016 mm for Heidenhain TNC 426. The result is significantly affected by the flatness of measured planes, where the overlap parameter of the tools has a significant impact on the flatness of the surface. With interchangeable cutter plate tools, it is better to use higher overlap to achieve better flatness. There is a significant difference in production time, with SolidCAM 25 min and 30 s, and Heidenhain 48 min and 19 s. In accordance with these findings, the SolidCAM system is more suitable for production.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document