scholarly journals Top 100 cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the major journals of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a bibliometric analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Saleh Alkhutari ◽  
Essam Ahmed Al-Moraissi ◽  
Endi Lanza Galvão ◽  
Nikolaos Christidis ◽  
Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Meta Analyses

scholarly journals Top 100 cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the major journals of oral and maxillofacial surgery : a bibliometric analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Essam Ahmed Almoraissi ◽  
Endi Lanza Galvão ◽  
Saulo Nikolaos Christidis ◽  
Gabriel Moreira Falci
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Oral Surgery ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral Pathology ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Oral Radiology ◽  
Meta Analyses

ABSTRACTThe aim of this bibliometric research was to identify and analyze the top 100 cited systematic reviews in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Using the Web of Science-database without restrictions on publication year or language, a bibliometric analysis was performed for the five major journals of oral and maxillofacial surgery: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery, British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Surgery Oral medicine Oral pathology Oral radiology. The most top-cited systematic review was published in 2015 with a total of 200 citations on survival and success rates of dental implants, consistent with the finding that “pre- and peri-implant surgery and dental implantology”, and “craniomaxillofacial deformities and cosmetic surgery” were the most frequently-cited topics (22% each). The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery displayed have got most citations in total and in average per publication. The outcome of this article can be used as a source of information not just for researchers but also for clinicians and students, and of which areas have a large impact on the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery but cannot reflect the quality of the included systematic reviews.

scholarly journals Top 100 Cited Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in The Major Journals of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Essam Al-Moraissi ◽  
Endi Lanza Galvão ◽  
Nikolaos Christidis ◽  
Saulo Gabriel Falci
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Oral Surgery ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral Pathology ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Oral Radiology

Abstract Background : The aim of this bibliometric research was to identify and analyze the top 100 cited systematic reviews in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Methods : Using the Web of Science-database without restrictions on publication year or language, a bibliometric analysis was performed for the five major journals of oral and maxillofacial surgery: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery, British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Surgery Oral medicine Oral pathology Oral radiology. Discussion : The most top-cited systematic review was published in 2015 with a total of 200 citations on survival and success rates of dental implants, consistent with the finding that “pre- and peri-implant surgery and dental implantology”, and “craniomaxillofacial deformities and cosmetic surgery” were the most frequently-cited topics (22% each). The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery displayed both most citations in total and in average per publication. The outcome of this article can be used as a source of information not just for researchers but also for clinicians and students, and of which areas have a large impact on the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery but cannot reflect the quality of the included systematic reviews.Systematic review registration: not applicable

KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC MAPPING

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Österberg ◽  
Anders Holmlund ◽  
Bo Sunzel ◽  
Sofia Tranæus ◽  
Svante Twetman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Premalignant Lesions ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Facial Trauma ◽  
Benign Tumors ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Knowledge Gaps

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate available knowledge and identify knowledge gaps within the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, by systematically collecting and evaluating systematic reviews. Twelve specific domains were selected: surgical removal of teeth, antibiotic and corticosteroid prophylaxis, orofacial infections, dental and facial trauma, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, benign tumors, cysts, premalignant lesions, oral complications of treatment of malignant tumors, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, temporomandibular joint surgery, cost effectiveness of different surgical treatments, and ethics.Methods: The literature search, covering four databases, was conducted during September 2014: PubMed, The Cochrane library, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and EBSCO dentistry and oral science source. Retrieved systematic reviews were quality assessed by AMSTAR.Results: In all, 1,778 abstracts were identified, of which 200 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-five systematic reviews were assessed as of high to moderate quality. The results disclosed some existing evidence in a few domains, such as surgical removal of teeth and implant survival after sinus lifts. However, in all domains, the search revealed a large number of knowledge gaps. Also of concern was the lack of data regarding health economics and ethics.Conclusions: In conclusion, there is a need for well-conducted clinical research in the fields of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Bibliometric analysis of dental sciences related articles published in an Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Journal from India

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thorakkal Shamim
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral Pathology ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Gandhi Medical College

Background: There is a paucity of information about the dental sciences related articles published in an Otorhinolaryngology journal from India. This bibliometric study aimed to audit the dental sciences related articles published in Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (IJOHNS) from 2014 to 2016 over a 3 year period.Materials and Method: Bibliometric analysis of issues of IJOHNS from 2014 to 2016 was performed using web-based search from Pubmed Central. The articles published were analyzed for topic of dental sciences, type of article, type of study, international collaborations, source of funding, number of authors and authorship trends.Results:Out of the total 60 published articles related to dental sciences, original articles (42), clinical reports (14),short communication(3) and review articles(1) contribute the major share. Regarding the relationship with dental sciences, the maximum number of published articles were related to oral and maxillofacial surgery (53) followed by oral pathology and microbiology (44), oral medicine and radiology (37), prosthodontics (17) and community dentistry (3).Among the articles published in IJOHNS, oral cancer (14) followed by diseases of salivary gland (13), oral mucosal lesions (6) and reconstructive surgery (5) form the major attraction of the contributors. The largest numbers of published articles related to dental sciences were received from Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh (5) and Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh (3).Conclusion: This paper may be considered as a baseline study for the bibliometric information regarding dental sciences related articles published in an Otorhinolaryngology journal from India. IJOHNS have published dental sciences related articles based on the merit of the topic irrespective of the speciality of the author.

scholarly journals Relationship between Headache and Myofascial Pain: Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 37-52
Author(s):  
May Wathiq Alkhudhairy ◽  
Ashwag Saleem Aldafiri ◽  
Yara Hamed Alsayegh ◽  
Wesam Saad Bin Saeed ◽  
Nadia Kamal Albather
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Myofascial Pain ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Qualitative Synthesis ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Headache Disability ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Relationship

Aims: To systematically investigate the relationship between headache and myofascial. Study design: Systematic Review. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Between June 2020 and November 2021. Methodology: A systematic search of the literature was conducted between 2006 and 2019 in seven electronic databases (Brain, Pub Med, ScienceDirect database, NCBI, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Saudi digital library). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed and the clinical question in PICO format was the relationship between headache and myofascial pain. The initial search resulted in 663 articles. Only 9 studies were selected for qualitative synthesis after fulfilling the eligibility criteria (three double blind Randomized Controlled Trials RCTs and one retrospective cohort study). The results showed that there is a consistent trend in the literature supporting the relationship between headache and MFP. Results: The first search showed 663 articles. A total of 110 duplicates were eliminated. After filtering by reading titles and abstracts and discarding any extraneous topics or goals that are not directly connected to this systematic review, the first phase comprised 49 publications. There were 14 papers that needed to be reviewed and evaluated for eligibility. Nine articles were chosen for the final evaluation after full text screening. Conclusion: The findings point to a significant association between headache disability and musculoskeletal disorders of the head and neck. The absence of an agreement in Orofacial Pain research methodology, unified approaches, has an impact on the optimal collecting requirements for a systematic review.

Hotspots in Psychology – 2020 Edition

2020 ◽  
Vol 228 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Michael Bošnjak ◽  
Nadine Wedderhoff
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Research Synthesis ◽  
Synthesis Methods ◽  
Common Denominator ◽  
The Common ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract. This editorial gives a brief introduction to the six articles included in the fourth “Hotspots in Psychology” of the Zeitschrift für Psychologie. The format is devoted to systematic reviews and meta-analyses in research-active fields that have generated a considerable number of primary studies. The common denominator is the research synthesis nature of the included articles, and not a specific psychological topic or theme that all articles have to address. Moreover, methodological advances in research synthesis methods relevant for any subfield of psychology are being addressed. Comprehensive supplemental material to the articles can be found in PsychArchives ( https://www.psycharchives.org ).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document