scholarly journals Impact of single vs. blended functional electrolyte additives on interphase formation and overall lithium ion battery performance

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 3145-3156
Author(s):  
Natascha von Aspern ◽  
Christian Wölke ◽  
Markus Börner ◽  
Martin Winter ◽  
Isidora Cekic-Laskovic

Abstract Two functional high-voltage additives, namely 2-(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropoxy)-1,3,2-dioxaphospholane (PFPOEPi) and 1-methyl-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazole (MBTFMP) were combined as functional additive mixture in organic carbonate–based electrolyte formulation for high-voltage lithium battery application. Their impact on the overall performance in NMC111 cathode-based cells was compared with the single-additive–containing electrolyte counterpart. The obtained results point to similar cycling performance of the additive mixture containing electrolyte formulation compared with the MBTFMP-containing cells, whereas the single PFPOEPi-containing cells displayed the best cycling performance in NMC111||graphite cells. With regard to the cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI), characterized and analyzed by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), both the MBTFMP and the PFPOEPi functional additives decompose on the NMC111 surface in single-additive–containing electrolyte formulations. However, the thickness of the CEI formed in the additive mixture–containing electrolyte formulation is determined by the MBTFMP additive, whereas the PFPOEPi additive impacts a change in the composition of the CEI. Furthermore, the MBTFMP additive decomposes prior to the PFPOEPi and, therefore, dominates the cycling performance of NMC111||graphite cells containing functional additive mixture–based electrolyte. This systematic approach allows us to understand the synergistic impact of each functional additive in an electrolyte formulation containing an additive mixture and helps to identify the right additive combination for advanced electrolyte formulation as well as to elucidate whether the single-additive or the additive mixture approach is more effective for the development of advanced functional electrolytes for lithium-based cell chemistries. Graphical abstract

2019 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 224-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Karthickprabhu ◽  
Dhanasekaran Vikraman ◽  
A. Kathalingam ◽  
K. Prasanna ◽  
Hyun-Seok Kim ◽  
...  

Liquids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-74
Author(s):  
Xin Ma ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Huajun Zhao ◽  
Qingrong Wang ◽  
Guangzhao Zhang ◽  
...  

Widening the working voltage of lithium-ion batteries is considered as an effective strategy to improve their energy density. However, the decomposition of conventional aprotic electrolytes at high voltage greatly impedes the success until the presence of high concentration electrolytes (HCEs) and the resultant localized HCEs (LHCEs). The unique solvated structure of HCEs/LHCEs endows the involved solvent with enhanced endurance toward high voltage while the LHCEs can simultaneously possess the decent viscosity for sufficient wettability to porous electrodes and separator. Nowadays, most LHCEs use LiFSI/LiTFSI as the salts and β-hydrofluoroethers as the counter solvents due to their good compatibility, yet the LHCE formula of cheap LiPF6 and high antioxidant α-hydrofluoroethers is seldom investigated. Here, we report a unique formula with 3 mol L−1 LiPF6 in mixed carbonate solvents and a counter solvent α-substituted fluorine compound (1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropylether). Compared to a conventional electrolyte, this formula enables dramatic improvement in the cycling performance of LiCoO2//graphite cells from approximately 150 cycles to 1000 cycles within the range of 2.9 to 4.5 V at 0.5 C. This work provides a new choice and scope to design functional LHCEs for high voltage systems.


2019 ◽  
Vol 166 (13) ◽  
pp. A2910-A2920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Patrick Schmiegel ◽  
Xin Qi ◽  
Sven Klein ◽  
Volker Winkler ◽  
Marco Evertz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 327 ◽  
pp. 135018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peipei Pang ◽  
Zheng Wang ◽  
Xinxin Tan ◽  
Yaoming Deng ◽  
Junmin Nan ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 768-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xifei Li ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Mohammad Norouzi Banis ◽  
Andrew Lushington ◽  
Ruying Li ◽  
...  

A highly lithium ionic conductive solid-state electrolyte coating layer significantly increases cathode performance in lithium ion batteries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 2911-2916
Author(s):  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
Xiao Chen ◽  
Guangxue Zhang ◽  
Chuanqi Feng

The MoO3/V2O5/C, MoO3/C and V2O5/C are synthesized by electrospinning combined with heat treatment. These samples are characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis (TG) techniques. The results show that sample MoO3/V2O5/C is a composite composed from MoO3, V2O5 and carbon. It takes on morphology of the nanofibers with the diameter of 200~500 nm. The TG analysis result showed that the carbon content in the composite is about 40.63%. Electrochemical properties for these samples are studied. When current density is 0.2 A g−1, the MoO3/V2O5/C could retain the specific capacity of 737.6 mAh g−1 after 200 cycles and its coulomb efficiency is 92.99%, which proves that MoO3/V2O5/C has better electrochemical performance than that of MoO3/C and V2O5/C. The EIS and linear Warburg coefficient analysis results show that the MoO3/V2O5/C has larger Li+ diffusion coefficient and superior conductivity than those of MoO3/C or V2O5/C. So MoO3/V2O5/C is a promising anode material for lithium ion battery application.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document