Directional Atherectomy and Balloon Angioplasty for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Osborn ◽  
Ralph B. Pfeiffer ◽  
S. Timothy String
Author(s):  
Hoang Van

Background: Chronic lower extremity arterial disease, mostly caused by atherosclerotic etiology, has been increasing in recent years. Currently, there has been a shift in the treatment chronic lower extremity arterial disease from open surgical treatment to endovascular intervention. According to the TASC classification, surgical treatment is preferred for patients with complex lesions of TASC C, D but recent studies have shown that endovascular intervention has had good results for high-grade lesions. Objective: To determine the efficacy, short-term results of endovascular intervention in patients with symptomatic lower extremity artery disease Methods: From January to December 2021, the cross sectional, descriptive study was carried out on 38 patients with lower limb artery disease, treated by endovascular intervetion in Interventional Department, Hanoi Heart hospital. All patients were evaluated by clinical symptoms, ankle- brachial index and lesion characteristic before and after the intervention to determine the initial success Results: Majority of lesions belong to TASC II C and D (78,9%). Injured arteries can be isolated in the aortoiliac (21,1%), femoropopliteal (21,1%), below-knee artery (21,1%) or combine aortoiliac and femoropopliteal (10,5%), femoropopliteal and BTK (15,8%). The ankle- brachial index before and after the intervention respectively 0,57 and 0.83 (p<0,001). The technical successful rate was 94,7%. Balloon angioplasty and stent placement were in 21 patients (55,3%) and balloon angioplasty in 17 patients (44,7%). Post-procedural complications included stent thrombosis (2.6%), amputation (2.6%), pseudoaneurysm at the puncture site (2.6%). Conclusion: Endovascular intervention is a safe, effective, minimally invasive method in the treatment of chronic lower extremity arterial disease


2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saumen Nandi ◽  
Anindya Mukherjee ◽  
Dibbendhu Khanra ◽  
Kaushik Biswas

This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-020-00091-z.


2021 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. e132-e137
Author(s):  
Mohammed Alagha ◽  
Thomas M. Aherne ◽  
Ahmed Hassanin ◽  
Adeel S. Zafar ◽  
Doireann P. Joyce ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Ankle-brachial pressure indices (ABIs) continue to form the basis of diagnostics for lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). However, there remains a paucity of data to support its accuracy. This study aims to evaluate its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity using established arterial-imaging modalities as a benchmark. Methods In this retrospective study, a regional, prospectively maintained, vascular laboratory database was interrogated to identify referred patients with arterial disease who underwent concomitant assessment with ABI and lower limb arterial duplex ultrasound (DUS). Duplex acted as the reference standard. Those who had peripheral computed tomography angiogram (CTA) within 3 months of initial assessment were included in a subgroup analysis to correlate ABI with CTA. The primary end point was the sensitivity and specificity of ABI compared with DUS as the reference standard. Results Concomitant assessment was performed in 438 limbs (250 patients) over a 27-month period. The ABI was normal (0.9 to 1.4) in 196 limbs (44.9%) and abnormal in the remaining 241 limbs (55.1%). False-positive results occurred in 83 out of 241 limbs (34.4%), and false-negative results occurred in 54 limbs out of 196 (27.5%). True-positive results were 158 out of 241 limbs (65.6%), whereas true-negative results were 142 out of 196 limbs (72.4%). ABI using DUS as a benchmark identified a sensitivity for peripheral artery disease of 72.3% and a specificity of 69.3%. Concomitant CTA imaging was available in 200 limbs. The sensitivity and specificity of ABI correlated with CTA were 65.5 and 68.8%, respectively. Conclusion ABIs have a moderate predictive value in the diagnosis of LEAD. Normal range outcomes cannot be taken to infer the absence of LEAD and, as such, further arterial imaging in the form of DUS or angiography should be strongly considered in those with suspected underlying disease requiring intervention. Further noninvasive tests such as exercise studies or pulse volume waveforms should be considered, if diagnostic uncertainty exists, in those requiring nonoperative intervention and risk factor control.


2000 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Y.-Z Forrest ◽  
Dorothy J Becker ◽  
Lewis H Kuller ◽  
Sidney K Wolfson ◽  
Trevor J Orchard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document