scholarly journals A phase II study of combination therapy with oral S-1 and cisplatin in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Sasaki ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Shunsuke Okazaki ◽  
Masahiro Goto ◽  
Yasushi Kojima ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. ii39
Author(s):  
Iwasa Satoru ◽  
Hamaguchi Tetsuya ◽  
Nagashima Kengo ◽  
Goto Masahiro ◽  
Okazaki Shunsuke ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 157-157
Author(s):  
Tetsuji Terazawa ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Yusuke Sasaki ◽  
Shunsuke Okazaki ◽  
Masahiro Goto ◽  
...  

157 Background: The incidence of gastric cancer increases gradually in individuals aged ≥ 75 years who account for about 40% of all patients. From the SPIRITS study, comparing S-1 monotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin (CDDP) combination therapy (median overall survival [OS]: 11.0 versus 13.0 months, p=0.04), S-1 and CDDP chemotherapy (SP regimen) is recognized as one of the standard first-line regimens for patients with advanced gastric cancer in Japan. However, patients in this trial were aged < 75 years. Methods: The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SP regimen in elderly patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced gastric cancer. Patients aged ≥ 76 years were given oral S-1 twice daily for 21 days, followed by 14 days rest; CDDP was intravenously infused at day 8, repeated every 35 days, for up to eight cycles. The dose of S-1 (50–120 mg/body) and CDDP (30–60 mg/m2) was adjusted depending on the patient’s body surface area and creatinine clearance (Ccr-adjusted SP regimen). The primary endpoint was OS. The threshold and expected OS were estimated at 8 and 14 months, respectively. Secondary endpoints included response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF) and adverse events. Results: From December 2012 to October 2014, 40 patients were enrolled at 15 institutions. Patient characteristics were: gender (M/F) 29/11; median age 78 (range, 76–89); ECOG PS0/1, 13/27; and unresectable/recurrence 30/10. The median cycle for each patient was four (range, 1–8). The median OS was 12.3 months (80% confidence interval, 10.2–14.4 months). The median PFS and TTF were 7.8 and 4.3 months, respectively. The RR was 54%. A dose reduction of S-1 and CDDP was made for 30% and 35% of patients, respectively. The protocol was discontinued in 17 patients (43%) for disease progression, 10 patients (25%) for adverse events and 7 patients (17%) for patient refusal. The main adverse events at a grade 3 or higher were anorexia (25%), neutropenia (23%), hyponatremia (20%) and anemia (18%). Treatment-related deaths did not occur. Conclusions: Ccr-adjusted SP regimen showed promising activity and was tolerated well by elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: UMIN000009349.


Chemotherapy ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Jun Xiang ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Feng Qiu ◽  
Feng Yu ◽  
Zheng Yu Zhan ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14515-e14515
Author(s):  
E. Goekkurt ◽  
S. Al-Batran ◽  
L. Obermann ◽  
C. Pauligk ◽  
N. Homann ◽  
...  

e14515 Background: Peripheral neuropathy (PNP) is a dose-limiting side effect of oxaliplatin based chemotherapy. High grade PNP may compromise quality of life especially in elderly patients (pts). A randomized multicenter phase II study was conducted to compare fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin with or without docetaxel (FLO vs. FLOT, respectively) in elderly pts with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Our purpose was to identify pharmacogenetic markers as predictors of high grade PNP within this study. Methods: 143 pts were enrolled in this study. Pts. were numerically >65 years or numerically >59 years but classified biologically >65 years as defined by an Instrumental Activities of Daily Living score of <8. PNP was classified according to an oxaliplatin specific scale. Genotyping was performed using PCR-based RFLP or TaqMan®-based allelic discrimination. 20 polymorphisms in 13 genes being part of the metabolism of the applied drugs or DNA repair were analyzed. Statistical analyses were based on stepwise multivariate cox regression models and included genotypes and clinical parameters. Results: Median age was 71 years (range 60–83). Pts received in median 6 cycles of treatment (range 1–12). 130 pts were evaluable for PN at time of analyses. Of these, 68 received FLO and 62 received FLOT. Cumulative grade 3 PNP occurred in 49% of pts without a significant difference between FLO and FLOT receiving pts (44% and 53%, respectively, p=0.4). Genotypes of TS and MTHFR could be identified as independent risk factors for grade 3 PNP by multivariate analyses. Pts carrying a TS promoter genotype known to be associated with low TS expression (2R/2R, 2R/3RC, 3RC/3RC) were at higher risk for developing grade 3 PNP compared to pts without one of these genotypes (OR 3.0 [95%CI 1.27; 7.06], p=0.01). Pts carrying MTHFR1298AC or CC genotypes were also at higher risk for experiencing grade 3 PNP compared to pts with the wildtype MTHFR-1298AA genotype (OR 3.1 [95%CI 1.26; 7.60], p=0.01). In fact, 89% of pts that experienced grade 3 PNP were carriers of at least one of these risk genotypes. Conclusions: Polymorphisms of TS and MTHFR might be associated with grade 3 PNP in AGC pts receiving oxaliplatin based chemotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document