scholarly journals HIV Prevention in Rural Appalachian Jails: Implications for Re-entry Risk Reduction Among Women Who Use Drugs

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 4009-4018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Staton ◽  
Justin C. Strickland ◽  
J. Matthew Webster ◽  
Carl Leukefeld ◽  
Carrie Oser ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 824-824
Author(s):  
Andre Brown ◽  
Mark Brennan-Ing ◽  
Steven Meanley ◽  
Sabina Haberlen ◽  
Deanna Ware ◽  
...  

Abstract Psychological sense of community (PSOC) in Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) may facilitate condom and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use to prevent HIV transmission. Understanding BMSM’s PSOC contribution to HIV risk reduction may inform HIV prevention efforts for this population, that is disproportionately affected by HIV. Adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and HIV status, we conducted logistic regressions to test the association between PSOC and condom use among aging BMSM (n=176). Multivariate analyses exhibited no association between PSOC and condom use (AOR= 0.994, 95% CI= 0.942, 1.049). HIV+ participants had higher condom use odds compared to HIV- participants (AOR= 4.031, 95% CI= 1.723, 9.426). A sub-analysis of HIV- participants (n=61), showed no associated between PSOC and PrEP use (AOR= 1.002, 95% CI= 0.904, 1.112). These results have implications for secondary HIV prevention and future research on alternative aspects of social support that may increase BMSM’s HIV risk reduction behaviors.


Author(s):  
Mary Ann Cohen ◽  
Harold W. Goforth

Since HIV disease was first recognized three decades ago, numerous efforts have been made to prevent its continued transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 56,000 Americans become infected each year—one person every 9 1/2 minutes—and that more than one million people in this country are now living with HIV (CDC, 2008, 2009;Hall et al., 2008). The CDC estimates that roughly 1 in 5 people infected with HIV in the United States is unaware of his or her infection and may be unknowingly transmitting the virus to others (CDC, 2008). Over the past 15 years, many behavioral HIV risk reduction interventions have been developed, with prevention efforts targeting mostly HIV-negative individuals and focusing almost exclusively on HIV testing and counseling. More recently, comprehensive HIV prevention has involved both primary and secondary prevention activities to decrease the number of new HIV infections and associated complications, respectively (Marks et al., 2006; O’Leary and Wolitski, 2009). Psychiatric factors both complicate and perpetuate the HIV pandemic as a result of unsafe sexual practices and substance use disorders. In this chapter, we describe some of the psychiatric and psychodynamic factors that lead to HIV transmission and present novel strategies to assist clinicians and health-care policymakers in prevention efforts. Primary prevention is defined as any activity that reduces the burden of morbidity or mortality from disease; it is to be distinguished from secondary prevention, in which activities are designed to prevent the complications of already existing disease. In the case of HIV, primary prevention efforts focus on strategies designed to prevent the transmission of HIV—keeping seronegative people seronegative. In the HIV pandemic, however, many prevention strategies share characteristics of both primary and secondary efforts, so the distinction is somewhat artificial. Multiple prevention strategies have been devised, and these center around HIV counseling, substance abuse programs, and HIV prevention and intervention programs for children. Counseling healthy pregnant women, uninfected children, adolescents, adults, and older persons about HIV risk reduction and providing information about sexual health are important components to primary prevention strategies, but few physicians and other clinicians actually do this unless it is a part of a program specifically designed to prevent HIV transmission.


1992 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilan Meyer ◽  
Francine Cournos ◽  
Maureen Empfield ◽  
Brenda Agosin ◽  
Paulette Floyd

2020 ◽  
pp. 002087282091773
Author(s):  
Carolina Vélez-Grau ◽  
Nabila El-Bassel ◽  
Tara McCrimmon ◽  
Assel Terlikbayeva ◽  
Sholpan Primbetova ◽  
...  

Over the past decade, Kazakhstan has experienced increased cases of HIV, especially among women who engage in sex work and use drugs. Research has examined the efficacy of structural interventions to reduce HIV risk; however, few studies have examined the experiences of women participating in these interventions. This study aimed to understand the perceived impact that HIV risk reduction and savings-led microfinance components of the Nova study had on women’s sexual and drug risk behaviors as well as their capacity for reducing income from sex work and finding alternative sources of income over time. The Nova study is a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted from 2013 to 2018 in Kazakhstan. It examines the efficacy of a combination of HIV risk reduction and microfinance among women who engage in sex work and women who use drugs. Data were drawn from the qualitative component of this study; 56 interviews with 19 participants were conducted. Template analysis and a qualitative trajectory approach were used to understand women’s perceptions of the impact that intervention had over time. Findings indicated that women perceived increased knowledge and skills related to condom use, safe sex practice, and drug use reduction. Women who received the microfinance component described perceived gains on budget management, capacity to plan for their future, and motivation to find alternative sources of income. Giving women the opportunity to express narrative experiences over time regarding the impact of this structural intervention may inform needed cultural adaptations of the intervention components and nuances of the environment in which the intervention is offered.


2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. Kaljee ◽  
Becky Genberg ◽  
Rosemary Riel ◽  
Matthew Cole ◽  
Le Huu Tho ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ucheoma Nwaozuru ◽  
Wakilat Tijani ◽  
Titi Gbajabiamila ◽  
Chisom Obiezu-Umeh ◽  
Florida Uzoaru ◽  
...  

Background: Human immunodeficiency virus risk-reduction interventions that include income-generating activities are garnering attention as effective strategies to engage adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) toward HIV risk reduction. To sustain and promote the uptake of these interventions, researchers must understand factors that may encourage or present barriers to AGYW participation in such interventions. This study explores AGYW perceived barriers and facilitators to participation in a school-based combination income-generating HIV prevention intervention in Nigeria.Methods: A convenience sample of AGYW who participated in a school-based combination income-generating HIV prevention intervention were recruited for the study. Data generated from focus group discussions (FGDs) (eight discussion groups comprising 10–12 participants) were analyzed by inductive thematic analysis.Results: A total of 93 participants with a mean age of 15.04 years (SD = 0.89) participated in the FGDs. The study participants identified several facilitators and barriers to participation in the intervention. Three main themes that emerged as facilitators were: (1) involvement of young female facilitators in the delivery of intervention components, (2) opportunity for social interaction with peers during the intervention period, and (3) support and approval from school authorities. Two main themes were also identified as barriers: (1) sexual conservatism from society and parents and (2) challenges in sustaining a microenterprise.Conclusions: Despite the perceived benefits and interest in participation in the intervention, the study participants outlined some challenges that may hinder participation in the intervention components. Addressing barriers, such as stigma associated with the discussion of sexual health-related topics, coupled with the promotion of facilitating factors, such as leveraging context-appropriate intervention delivery modalities, is important for enhancing the engagement of AGYW in HIV risk-reduction intervention. Our findings can guide future research and design of combination income-generating HIV prevention interventions for in-school AGYW in low-resource settings such as Nigeria.


Author(s):  
Sibongile Mashaphu ◽  
Jonathan K. Burns ◽  
Gail E. Wyatt ◽  
Naseema B. Vawda

Background: Sexual transmission of HIV frequently occurs in the context of a primary relationship between two partners; however, HIV prevention interventions generally focus on individuals at risk, rather than specifying couples as a unit of change and analysis, neglecting the crucial role that partners may play in sexual behaviour. This article reviews published scientific literature addressing couple-oriented HIV counselling and testing and other behavioural interventions using an online search for peer-reviewed papers.Methods: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate what has been published on psychosocial interventions in HIV serodiscordant couples in Africa. Electronic databases were searched from January 1990 to December 2015. Quality assessment of included studies was conducted using the Systematic Appraisal of Quality in Observational Research tool.Results: The electronic database searches initially retrieved 493 records; after cross-referencing, removing duplicates and applying strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, only eight papers were included in this review. All the studies under review showed that couples-focused counselling and educational programmes were associated with positive outcomes including reduced HIV transmission, reduced unprotected sex, increased rates of status disclosure and high levels of treatment adherence.Conclusions: The literature on interventions for HIV serodiscordant couples is sparse. However, most interventions indicate that couples-focused interventions are effective in HIV risk reduction. In spite of the limited available data and repeated recommendations by different health authorities, couple-centred approaches to HIV prevention have not been implemented on a large scale.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document