scholarly journals Combined effects of axial load and concrete strength variation on the seismic performance of existing RC buildings

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 805-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Mariani ◽  
M. Tanganelli ◽  
S. Viti ◽  
M. De Stefano
2011 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. 386-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu Kono ◽  
Kohei Sakamoto ◽  
Masanobu Sakashita

This paper addresses the seismic performance of core-walls based on an experiment and numerical analysis on two 1/7.5 scaled L-shaped concrete core-wall specimens. Concrete strength was 77 MPa and the yield strength of vertical reinforcement was over 700MPa. Test variable was the loading path on the axial load – lateral load relation. Axial load was varied as high as 6MN or 50% of the axial load capacity for one specimen and 4.2MN or 35% for the other specimen as a linear function of the lateral load. The lateral load-drift relations were recorded with local deformation and damage, focusing on the yield of reinforcement and crushing of concrete. Damage of columns was severe and indicated the importance of good confinement at this region for better seismic performance. The numerical models with finite shell elements well simulated the intensity and extent of damage in addition to backbone curves of lateral load - drift angle relations when the pullout of longitudinal reinforcement of columns is considered.


2021 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 106897
Author(s):  
Gianni Blasi ◽  
Daniele Perrone ◽  
Maria Antonietta Aiello ◽  
Maria Rosaria Pecce

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueyuan Yan ◽  
Suguo Wang ◽  
Canling Huang ◽  
Ai Qi ◽  
Chao Hong

Precast monolithic structures are increasingly applied in construction. Such a structure has a performance somewhere between that of a pure precast structure and that of a cast-in-place structure. A precast concrete frame structure is one of the most common prefabricated structural systems. The post-pouring joint is important for controlling the seismic performance of the entire precast monolithic frame structure. This paper investigated the joints of a precast prestressed concrete frame structure. A reversed cyclic loading test was carried out on two precast prestressed concrete beam–column joints that were fabricated with two different concrete strengths in the keyway area. This testing was also performed on a cast-in-place reinforced concrete joint for comparison. The phenomena such as joint crack development, yielding, and ultimate damage were observed, and the seismic performance of the proposed precast prestressed concrete joint was determined. The results showed that the precast prestressed concrete joint and the cast-in-place joint had a similar failure mode. The stiffness, bearing capacity, ductility, and energy dissipation were comparable. The hysteresis curves were full and showed that the joints had good energy dissipation. The presence of prestressing tendons limited the development of cracks in the precast beams. The concrete strength of the keyway area had little effect on the seismic performance of the precast prestressed concrete joints. The precast prestressed concrete joints had a seismic performance that was comparable to the equivalent monolithic system.


2013 ◽  
Vol 353-356 ◽  
pp. 1990-1999
Author(s):  
Yi Sheng Su ◽  
Er Cong Meng ◽  
Zu Lin Xiao ◽  
Yun Dong Pi ◽  
Yi Bin Yang

In order to discuss the effect of different concrete strength on the seismic behavior of the L-shape steel reinforced concrete (SRC) short-pier shear wall , this article analyze three L-shape steel reinforced concrete short-pier shear walls of different concrete strength with the numerical simulation software ABAQUS, revealing the effects of concrete strength on the walls seismic behavior. The results of the study show that the concrete strength obviously influence the seismic performance. With the concrete strength grade rise, the bearing capacity of the shear wall becomes large, the ductility becomes low, the pinch shrinkage effect of the hysteresis loop becomes more obvious.


2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikos D. Lagaros ◽  
Nikolaos Bakas ◽  
Manolis Papadrakakis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document