Combined flow cytometry determination of S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy is an independent prognostic factor in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma: analysis of a series of 271 patients with stage I and II breast cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Moureau-Zabotto ◽  
C. Bouchet ◽  
D. Cesari ◽  
S. Uzan ◽  
J.-P. Lefranc ◽  
...  
1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1717-1722 ◽  
Author(s):  
O Stål ◽  
M Dufmats ◽  
T Hatschek ◽  
J Carstensen ◽  
C Klintenberg ◽  
...  

PURPOSE AND METHODS The prognostic significance of cell proliferation, estimated as cytometric S-phase fraction (SPF), was investigated in node-negative breast cancer patients with small tumors (T1, NO). The 219 stage I patients originated from two series and were diagnosed either from 1978 to 1981 or from 1981 to 1985. The tumors were analyzed for estrogen receptors (ERs) by isoelectric focusing and for cellular DNA content by static cytofluorometry or flow cytometry. RESULTS A high SPF correlated with the absence of ERs and abnormal DNA content, and was less often found in tumors smaller than 11 mm compared with those with a diameter between 11 and 20 mm. Among the variables age, tumor size, DNA ploidy, ER status, and SPF, only SPF showed a significant association with distant recurrence and breast cancer survival in systemically untreated patients. The relative recurrence rate for patients with an SPF of 10% or greater was three times that for patients with lower SPFs. Estimated 8-year breast cancer survival rates for the same groups were 72% and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSION This study suggests that cytometric SPF has prognostic significance in stage I breast carcinoma.


2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Page ◽  
Robert Gray ◽  
D. Craig Allred ◽  
Lynn G. Dressler ◽  
Alan K. Hatfield ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 1752-1761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
James N. Ingle ◽  
Steven S. Cha ◽  
Daniel J. Schaid ◽  
Roxanne L. Tabery ◽  
...  

Cytometry ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.B. Bagwell ◽  
G.M. Clark ◽  
F. Spyratos ◽  
A. Chassevent ◽  
P.-O. Bendahl ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
T E Witzig ◽  
J N Ingle ◽  
D J Schaid ◽  
L E Wold ◽  
J F Barlow ◽  
...  

PURPOSE AND METHODS To help clarify the clinical utility of flow-cytometric parameters, we performed flow cytometry on archival paraffin-embedded primary breast cancers from 502 patients treated on two adjuvant chemotherapy protocols performed by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) and Mayo Clinic. DNA ploidy and percent S-phase (%S) were examined in univariate and Cox model multivariate analyses along with tumor size, menopausal and estrogen receptor status, Quetelet's index (QI), number of positive nodes and nodes examined, and Fisher and nuclear grades. RESULTS Ploidy analysis showed that 40% of tumors were DNA diploid and 60% were DNA nondiploid (12% tetraploid and 48% aneuploid). There was no difference in relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = .82) or overall survival (OS) (P = .78) between the ploidy groups. Tetraploid patients had the longest RFS and OS of any group, but this did not achieve statistical significance. The %S was computed in 98% of cases and the medians were 9.0% for all patients, 6.4% for diploid patients, and 11.7% for nondiploid patients (P < .0001). By use of a %S greater than 12.3 as a prognostic variable in a univariate analysis, there was a significant difference in the RFS (P = .02) and OS (P = .007) of patients with low- versus high-proliferative tumors. However, when the %S was adjusted for clinical characteristics in the multivariate analysis, it was not a significant factor for RFS (P = .23) or OS (P = .36). CONCLUSION These results indicate that DNA content and %S measurements by flow cytometry are not clinically useful independent prognostic factors in women with resected node-positive breast cancer administered adjuvant chemotherapy.


Pathology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue W.J. Wong ◽  
Anna M. Rangan ◽  
A. Michael Bilous ◽  
John Boyages ◽  
Val Gebski ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document