scholarly journals A comparison of complete pathologic response rates following neoadjuvant chemotherapy among South African breast cancer patients with and without concurrent HIV infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 184 (3) ◽  
pp. 861-872
Author(s):  
Sarah Nietz ◽  
Daniel S O’Neil ◽  
Oluwatosin Ayeni ◽  
Wenlong Carl Chen ◽  
Maureen Joffe ◽  
...  
The Breast ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annina Baumgartner ◽  
Christoph Tausch ◽  
Stefanie Hosch ◽  
Bärbel Papassotiropoulos ◽  
Zsuzsanna Varga ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 502-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gronwald ◽  
T. Byrski ◽  
T. Huzarski ◽  
R. Dent ◽  
V. Bielicka ◽  
...  

502 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is administered to control disease, make surgical resection possible and increase the possibility of breast tissue conservation. A further advantage of neoadjuvant therapy is that it helps to assess chemo-sensitivity to a particular agent. Induction of a pathological complete response (pCR) is one of the primary goals of neoadjuvant therapy in order to achieve a better disease-free and overall survival. Experimental data suggest that BRCA1 related breast cancer may have increased sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy, but clinical data are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of complete pathologic response after neo-adjuvant treatment with cisplatin chemotherapy in women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation. Methods: Twenty five women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation with stage I, II, and III breast cancer between December 2006 and December 2008 were entered into this study. Patients were treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 intravenously every three weeks for four cycles. After chemotherapy, patients underwent surgery and were assessed for pathologic response in both the breast and axillary lymph nodes. Complete pathologic response was defined as no residual invasive disease in both the breast and axilla, however ductal carcinoma in situ was allowed. Results: Twenty five patients were enrolled in the study. Thirteen patients had tumors of greater than two centimeters (52%) and seven patients had positive lymph nodes at diagnosis (28%). Twenty two patients completed four cycles of cisplatin (88%) and three patients completed two cycles (12%). Clinical complete response was observed in eighteen patients (72%). Pathologic complete response was observed in eighteen patients (72%). Conclusions: Platinum-based chemotherapy is effective in a high proportion of patients with BRCA1-associated breast cancers. Clinical trials are warranted to determine the optimum treatment for this subgroup of breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11564-e11564
Author(s):  
D. Gupta ◽  
V. Raina ◽  
N. K. Shukla ◽  
G. K. Rath ◽  
B. K. Mohanti ◽  
...  

e11564 Background: LABC is a major problem in our country comprising of ≥ 20% of all breast cancer patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is now standard treatment for LABC but randomized trials have failed to show survival advantage. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed locally advanced breast cancer (stage III) patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) from January 2000 to December 2008. Out of 3000 case records screened, 570 (19%) were LABC and 110/570 (19%) treatment-naïve patients started on NACT were analyzed. Ninety one (37 docetaxel [D], 54 anthracycline [A]) patients were eligible for response and survival analysis. Pathological CR (pCR) was defined as no evidence of malignancy in both breast and axilla. Survival curves generated using Kaplan-Meier method and survivals compared using log-rank test. Results: Median age of whole cohort was 45 years (range 25–68 years). Premenopausal were 42% and ER+ 49.5%. Most (90%) were T4 tumors and 70% were stage IIIB. Median number of preoperative cycles was 3 and 6 in D and A group. Overall clinical response rates for breast primary were 74.3% (CR 28.6%) and 53.7% (CR 16.7%, p=0.58) while for axilla ORR were 75.7% (51.4% CR) vs 54.8% (40.4% CR, p=0.77) respectively for D and A. Corresponding pCR rates were 19% vs 13% respectively. There was no significant difference in disease free (3 year 56.84% vs 61.16%, p=0.80) and overall survival (3 year 70% vs 78.5%, p=0.86) between two groups. Those who achieved pCR in both groups also had no survival advantage (p=0.34) over non achievers. There was no difference in pCR rates for ER+ vs ER- patients but ER+ patients had significantly higher DFS than ER- patients (p=0.05). Conclusions: Although pCR rates were higher with docetaxel based NACT, it did not translate into superior DFS/OS compared to anthracycline based chemotherapies. Achievement of pCR too, was not associated with any survival advantage. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Author(s):  
Neha Goel ◽  
Sina Yadegarynia ◽  
Steve Rodgers ◽  
Kristin Kelly ◽  
Amber Collier ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document