scholarly journals Analysis of the pan-Asian subgroup of patients in the NALA Trial: a randomized phase III NALA Trial comparing neratinib+capecitabine (N+C) vs lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C) in patients with HER2+metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with two or more HER2-directed regimens

2021 ◽  
Vol 189 (3) ◽  
pp. 665-676
Author(s):  
Ming Shen Dai ◽  
Yin Hsun Feng ◽  
Shang Wen Chen ◽  
Norikazu Masuda ◽  
Thomas Yau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Cns Disease ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

Abstract Purpose Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated systemic efficacy and intracranial activity in various stages of HER2+breast cancer. NALA was a phase III randomized trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of neratinib+capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C) in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients who had received ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens. Descriptive analysis results of the Asian subgroup in the NALA study are reported herein. Methods 621 centrally assessed HER2+ mBC patients were enrolled, 202 of whom were Asian. Those with stable, asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) were eligible for study entry. Patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240 mg qd) + C (750 mg/m2 bid, day 1–14) with loperamide prophylaxis or to L (1250 mg qd) + C (1000 mg/m2 bid, day 1–14) in 21-day cycles. Co-primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included time to intervention for central nervous system (CNS) disease, objective response rate, duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, and safety. Results 104 and 98 Asian patients were randomly assigned to receive N+C or L+C, respectively. Median PFS of N+C and L+C was 7.0 and 5.4 months (P = 0.0011), respectively. Overall cumulative incidence of intervention for CNS disease was lower with N+C (27.9 versus 33.8%; P = 0.039). Both median OS (23.8 versus 18.7 months; P = 0.185) and DoR (11.1 versus 4.2 months; P < 0.0001) were extended with N+C, compared to L+C. The incidences of grade 3/4 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation were mostly comparable between the two arms. Diarrhea and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were the most frequent TEAEs in both arms, similar to the overall population in incidence and severity. Conclusion Consistent with the efficacy profile observed in the overall study population, Asian patients with HER2+ mBC, who had received ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens, may also benefit from N+C. No new safety signals were noted. Clinical trial registration NCT01808573

scholarly journals Analysis of the Pan-Asian Subgroup of patients in the NALA Trial: A Randomized Phase III NALA Trial Comparing Neratinib + Capecitabine (N+C) vs Lapatinib + Capecitabine (L+C) in Patients with HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) Previously Treated with Two or more HER2-Directed Regimens

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Shen Dai ◽  
Yin Hsun Feng ◽  
Shang Wen Chen ◽  
Norikazu Masuda ◽  
Chung Cheung Thomas Yau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Cns Disease ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

Abstract Purpose: Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated systemic efficacy and intracranial activity in various stages of HER2+ breast cancer. NALA was a phase III randomized trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of neratinib + capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib + capecitabine (L+C) in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients who had received ≥2 HER2-directed regimens. Descriptive analysis results of the Asian subgroup in the NALA study are reported herein.Methods: 621 centrally-assessed HER2+ mBC patients were enrolled, 202 of whom were Asian. Those with stable, asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) were eligible for study entry. Patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240mg qd) + C (750mg/m2 bid, day 1-14) with loperamide prophylaxis, or to L (1250mg qd) + C (1000mg/m2 bid, day 1-14) in 21-day cycles. Co-primary endpoints were centrally-assessed progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included time to intervention for central nervous system (CNS) disease, objective response rate, duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, and safety.Results: 104 and 98 Asian patients were randomly assigned to receive N+C or L+C, respectively. Median PFS of N+C and L+C was 7.0 and 5.4 months (P=0.0014), respectively. Overall cumulative incidence of intervention for CNS disease was lower with N+C (27.9 versus 33.8%; P=0.039). Both median OS (23.8 versus 18.7 months; P=0.185) and DoR (11.1 versus 4.2 months; P<0.0001) were extended with N+C, compared to L+C. Diarrhea was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) in both arms (78.8 versus 51.0%). The incidence of grade 3/4 TEAEs and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation was comparable between the two arms.Conclusion: Consistent with the efficacy profile observed in the overall study population, Asian patients with HER2+ mBC, who had received ≥2 HER2-directed regimens, may also benefit from N+C. No new safety signals were noted. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01808573

scholarly journals Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With ≥ 2 HER2-Directed Regimens: Phase III NALA Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (27) ◽  
pp. 3138-3149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Saura ◽  
Mafalda Oliveira ◽  
Yin-Hsun Feng ◽  
Ming-Shen Dai ◽  
Shang-Wen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
End Points ◽  
Cns Disease

PURPOSE NALA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01808573 ) is a randomized, active-controlled, phase III trial comparing neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), plus capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib, a reversible dual TKI, plus capecitabine (L+C) in patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with ≥ 2 previous HER2-directed MBC regimens. METHODS Patients, including those with stable, asymptomatic CNS disease, were randomly assigned 1:1 to neratinib (240 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (750 mg/m2 twice a day 14 d/21 d) with loperamide prophylaxis, or to lapatinib (1,250 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice a day 14 d/21 d). Coprimary end points were centrally confirmed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). NALA was considered positive if either primary end point was met (α split between end points). Secondary end points were time to CNS disease intervention, investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS A total of 621 patients from 28 countries were randomly assigned (N+C, n = 307; L+C, n = 314). Centrally reviewed PFS was improved with N+C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.93; stratified log-rank P = .0059). The OS HR was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.07; P = .2098). Fewer interventions for CNS disease occurred with N+C versus L+C (cumulative incidence, 22.8% v 29.2%; P = .043). ORRs were N+C 32.8% (95% CI, 27.1 to 38.9) and L+C 26.7% (95% CI, 21.5 to 32.4; P = .1201); median DoR was 8.5 versus 5.6 months, respectively (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74; P = .0004). The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (N+C 83% v L+C 66%) and nausea (53% v 42%). Discontinuation rates and HRQoL were similar between groups. CONCLUSION N+C significantly improved PFS and time to intervention for CNS disease versus L+C. No new N+C safety signals were observed.

Neratinib + capecitabine versus lapatinib + capecitabine in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer previously treated with ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens: Findings from the multinational, randomized, phase III NALA trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1002-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Saura ◽  
Mafalda Oliveira ◽  
Yin-Hsun Feng ◽  
Ming-Shen Dai ◽  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cns Disease ◽  
Patient Reported

1002 Background: NALA (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01808573) is a multinational, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of neratinib (an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]) + capecitabine (N+C) vs lapatinib (a reversible dual TKI) + capecitabine (L+C) in patients with stage IV HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had received ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens for MBC. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240 mg qd po) + C (750 mg/m2 bid po) or L (1250 mg qd po) + C (1000 mg/m2 bid po). Co-primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS; objective response rate (ORR); duration of response (DoR); clinical benefit rate (CBR); time to intervention for symptomatic metastatic central nervous system (CNS) disease; safety; and patient-reported health outcomes. Results: 621 patients were randomized (307 to N+C; 314 to L+C). The risk of disease progression or death was reduced by 24% with N+C vs L+C (HR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.63–0.93; p = 0.006); 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 47.2% vs 37.8% and 28.8% vs 14.8% for N+C vs L+C, respectively. OS rates at 6 and 12 months were 90.2% vs 87.5% and 72.5% vs 66.7% for N+C vs L+C, respectively (HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.72–1.07; p = 0.2086). ORR in patients with measurable disease at screening was improved with N+C vs L+C (32.8% vs 26.7%; p = 0.1201), as was CBR (44.5% vs 35.6%; p = 0.0328) and DoR (HR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.33–0.74; p = 0.0004). Time to intervention for symptomatic CNS disease (overall cumulative incidence 22.8% vs 29.2%; p = 0.043) was delayed with N+C vs L+C. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between arms, but there was a higher rate of grade 3 diarrhea with N+C vs L+C (24.4% vs 12.5%). TEAEs leading to neratinib/lapatinib discontinuation were lower with neratinib (10.9%) than with lapatinib (14.5%). Conclusions: N+C significantly improved PFS with a trend towards improved OS vs L+C. N+C also resulted in a delayed time to intervention for symptomatic CNS disease. Tolerability was similar between the two arms, with no new safety signals observed. Clinical trial information: NCT01808573.

Pyrotinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with brain metastases (PERMEATE): A multicenter, single-arm phase II study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1037-1037
Author(s):  
Min Yan ◽  
Quchang Ouyang ◽  
Tao Sun ◽  
Limin Niu ◽  
Jin Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive

1037 Background: HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) has a high risk of brain metastases (BM), leading to poor survival. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with enhanced penetrability to the blood brain barrier combined with capecitabine have demonstrated promising clinical outcomes in HER2-positive metastatic BC patients with untreated (such as lapatinib) or previously treated (such as neratinib) BM. The randomized phase III PHOEBE trial has proved better efficacy of pyrotinib, an irreversible pan-HER receptor TKI, versus lapatinib when in combination with capecitabine in HER2-positive local relapsed or metastatic BC. This study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic BC patients with BM. Methods: In this multicenter phase II trial (NCT03691051), eligible patients received pyrotinib 400 mg orally once daily without breaks and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days off. Treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Prior HER2 TKIs were not allowed. Cohort A included patients with radiotherapy-naive BM, and cohort B included those with progressive BM after whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic conformal radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was confirmed central nervous system (CNS) objective response rate (ORR), as assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1. Results: Between January 2018 and July 2020, a total of 78 female patients were included (Table). For cohort A (n = 59), the CNS ORR was 74.6% (95%CI: 61.6%-85.0%). For cohort B (n = 19), the CNS ORR was 42.1% (95%CI: 20.3%-66.5%). By the cutoff date on 25 January 2021, the median progression-free survival was 12.1 months (95%CI: 9.0-14.7) in cohort A and 5.6 months (95%CI: 3.4-10.7) in cohort B. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were diarrhea (23.1% [18/78]), neutrophil count decreased (12.8% [10/78]), white blood cell count decreased (12.8% [10/78]), anemia (9.0% [7/78]), hand-foot syndrome (7.7% [6/78]), hypertriglyceridemia (6.4% [5/78]), and hypokalemia (5.1% [4/78]). Conclusions: Pyrotinib plus capecitabine resulted as an effective and safe treatment for HER2-positive BC patients with radiotherapy-naive BM, but the efficacy was modest in those with radiotherapy-treated BM. Clinical trial information: NCT03691051 .[Table: see text]

Neratinib: the emergence of a new player in the management of HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 247-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azadeh Nasrazadani ◽  
Adam Brufsky
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis

HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer has become an effectively treatable disease in the era of targeted therapies, and outcomes have improved such that prognosis of this subtype is demonstrated to be superior to HER2-negative disease. Despite these advances, durable responses in HER2+ metastatic disease are challenged by the increased risk for brain metastasis. Neratinib is an irreversible pan-HER kinase inhibitor that has emerged as an effective agent when combined with capecitabine for the management of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients with brain metastasis. The randomized, Phase III, NALA trial compares neratinib plus capecitabine to a currently prevailing regimen of lapatinib plus capecitabine and is provided herein. Analysis of NALA portends meaningful changes on the horizon for the management of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.

scholarly journals Observational study of clinical outcomes of eribulin mesylate in metastatic breast cancer after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (34) ◽  
pp. 3935-3944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah S Mougalian ◽  
Bruce A Feinberg ◽  
Edward Wang ◽  
Karenza Alexis ◽  
Debanjana Chatterjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Eribulin Mesylate ◽  
Free Survival

Aim: To examine the effectiveness of eribulin mesylate for metastatic breast cancer post cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDKi) 4/6 therapy. Materials & methods: US community oncologists reviewed charts of patients who had received eriublin from 3 February 2015 to 31 December 2017 after prior CDKi 4/6 therapy and detailed their clinical/treatment history, clinical outcomes (lesion measurements, progression, death) and toxicity. Results: Four patient cohorts were created according to eribulin line of therapy: second line, third line, per US label and fourth line with objective response rates/clinical benefit rates of 42.2%/58.7%, 26.1%/42.3%, 26.7%/54.1% and 17.9%/46.4%, respectively. Median progression-free survival/6-month progression-free survival (79.5% of all patients censored) by cohort was: 9.7 months/77.3%, 10.3 months/71.3%, not reached/70.4% and 4.0 months/0.0%, respectively. Overall occurrence of neutropenia = 23.5%, febrile neutropenia = 1.3%, peripheral neuropathy = 10.1% and diarrhea = 11.1%. Conclusion: Clinical outcome and adverse event rates were similar to those in clinical trials and other observational studies. Longer follow-up is required to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals PALOMA-3: Phase III Trial of Fulvestrant With or Without Palbociclib in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer That Progressed on Prior Endocrine Therapy—Safety and Efficacy in Asian Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroji Iwata ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Norikazu Masuda ◽  
Young-Hyuck Im ◽  
Kenichi Inoue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Purpose To assess efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus fulvestrant in Asians with endocrine therapy–resistant metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods The Palbociclib Ongoing Trials in the Management of Breast Cancer 3 (PALOMA-3) trial, a double-blind phase III study, included 521 patients with hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer with disease progression on endocrine therapy. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed on study treatment and at the end of treatment. Results This preplanned subgroup analysis of the PALOMA-3 study included premenopausal and postmenopausal Asians taking palbociclib plus fulvestrant (n = 71) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n = 31). Palbociclib plus fulvestrant improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with fulvestrant alone. Median PFS was not reached with palbociclib plus fulvestrant (95% CI, 9.2 months to not reached) but was 5.8 months with placebo plus fulvestrant (95% CI, 3.5 to 9.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.485; 95% CI, 0.270 to 0.869; P = .0065). The most common all-cause grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the palbociclib arm were neutropenia (92%) and leukopenia (29%); febrile neutropenia occurred in 4.1% of patients. Within-patient mean trough concentration comparisons across subgroups indicated similar palbociclib exposure between Asians and non-Asians. Global quality of life was maintained; no statistically significant changes from baseline were observed for patient-reported outcome scores with palbociclib plus fulvestrant. Conclusion This is the first report, to our knowledge, showing that palbociclib plus fulvestrant improves PFS in asian patients. Palbociclib plus fulvestrant was well tolerated in this study.

scholarly journals A lower apatinib dose provides equivalent efficacy and reduced toxicity: A phase II, single-arm study of apatinib and oral etoposide in metastatic breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanlin Hu ◽  
Anjie Zhu ◽  
Yiran Si ◽  
Jian Yue ◽  
Xue Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Oral Etoposide ◽  
Equivalent Efficacy ◽  
Reduced Toxicity

Abstract Background:The effectiveness of antiangiogenic drugs in metastatic breast cancer(MBC) is still unclear. Apatinib is a small tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2). We performed this clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib and oral etoposide in patients with HER2-negative locally advanced or MBC.Methods:Patients with HER2-negative MBC previously treated with anthracycline and taxanes and failed ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy regimens were recruited. The starting dose of apatinib was 500 mg and 425 mg in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 0–1 and 2, respectively. The etoposide capsules were given at 50 mg/m2 on days 1 to 10 for 21 days. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) which is assessed every 6 weeks (RECIST v1.1). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.Results:Thirty-one eligible patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 11 months. The median PFS for all patients was 6.93 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.97–7.90), and 6.93 months(95% CI 5.27–8.60) and 6.56 months (95% CI 1.41–11.73) for patients with apatinib 425 mg and 500 mg once daily, respectively. The ORR was 35.5% (11/31). The DCR was 87.1% (27/31). The median OS was 20.37 months (95% CI, 11.39–29.34). The median PFS of patients who had hypertension and proteinuria was longer than that for those without hypertension and proteinuria. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events(AE) were hypertension (12/31, 38.71%), fatigue (3/31, 9.68%), thrombocytopenia (3/31, 9.68%).Conclusion:Apatinib combined with etoposide capsules is effective and tolerable in heavily pretreated, metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer patients. A lower apatinib dose provide equivalent efficacy and reduced toxicity.

scholarly journals Pyrotinib Combined With Vinorelbine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Li ◽  
Yixuan Qiu ◽  
Huihui Li ◽  
Ting Luo ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Line Therapy

IntroductionPyrotinib plus capecitabine has been approved in China for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Meanwhile, vinorelbine is another important chemotherapy option for MBC available in oral and intravenous forms. Thus, pyrotinib plus vinorelbine may represent a new treatment option, particularly for patients with failed capecitabine treatment. This study reported the first real-world data for pyrotinib plus vinorelbine therapy in HER2+ MBC.MethodsHER2+ MBC patients (n = 97) treated with pyrotinib plus vinorelbine in six institutions across China from May 2018 to June 2020 were enrolled. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profiles were determined.ResultsSixty-seven percent of patients received more than two lines of systematic therapy. Nearly all patients (97.9%) had received trastuzumab and 50.5% were administered lapatinib. When combined with pyrotinib, 74.2% received oral and 25.8% received intravenous vinorelbine. Median PFS (mPFS) was 7.8 (range, 4.7–10.8) months for all patients. The mPFS in patients administered pyrotinib as second-line therapy and third-or-higher-line therapy were 12.0 and 6.4 months, respectively. Patients who received pyrotinib plus oral or intravenous vinorelbine had similar mPFS (7.8 vs. 6.4 months, p = 0.871). The 23 patients with brain metastases had mPFS of 6.3 (range, 3.4–9.2) months. Lapatinib-naïve patients had significantly longer PFS than lapatinib-treated patients (10.8 months vs. 5.6 months, p = 0.020). Median OS was not achieved. The ORR for 96 patients was 34.3%. Common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were diarrhea (22.7%), neutropenia (7.2%), and leukopenia (4.1%).ConclusionsPyrotinib plus vinorelbine therapy demonstrated promising effects in HER2+ MBC with tolerable toxicity, particularly in patients with second-line treatment and without prior lapatinib treatment, as well as in patients with brain metastases. Oral vinorelbine is a useful alternative to the intravenous form when combined with pyrotinib.Clinical Trial Registration[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT04517305].

scholarly journals A lower apatinib dose provides equivalent efficacy and reduced toxicity: A phase II, single-arm study of apatinib and oral etoposide in metastatic breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanlin Hu ◽  
Anjie Zhu ◽  
Yiran Si ◽  
Jian Yue ◽  
Xue Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Oral Etoposide ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Equivalent Efficacy

Abstract Introduction : The effectiveness of antiangiogenic drugs in metastatic breast cancer is still unclear. Apatinib is a small tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2). We performed this clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib and oral etoposide in patients with HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer(MBC).Methods : Patients with HER2-negative MBC previously treated with anthracycline and taxanes and failed ≥1 prior chemotherapy regimens were recruited. The starting dose of apatinib was 500 mg and 425 mg in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 0-1 and 2, respectively. The etoposide capsules were given at 50 mg/m 2 on days 1 to 10 for 21 days. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) which is assessed every 6 weeks (RECIST v1.1). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.Results : Thirty-one eligible patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 11 months. The median PFS for all patients was 6.93 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.97–7.90), and 6.93 months(95% CI 5.27-8.60) and 6.56 months (95% CI 1.41-11.73) for patients with apatinib 425mg and 500mg once daily, respectively. The ORR was 35.5% (11/31). The DCR was 87.1% (27/31). The median OS was 20.37 months (95% CI, 11.39–29.34). The median PFS of patients who had hypertension and proteinuria was longer than that for those without hypertension and proteinuria. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events(AE) were hypertension (12/31, 38.71%), fatigue (3/31, 9.68%), thrombocytopenia (3/31, 9.68%).Conclusion : Apatinib combined with etoposide capsules is effective and tolerable in heavily pretreated, metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer patients. A lower apatinib dose provide equivalent efficacy and reduced toxicity.Trial registration : ClinicalTrails, NCT03535961, Registered 24 May 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03535961?cond=apatinib+etoposide+breast+cancer&draw=2&rank=1

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document