Cholelithiasis and risk of pancreatic cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 observational studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1543-1551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanfeng Gong ◽  
Siying Li ◽  
Yunqiang Tang ◽  
Cong Mai ◽  
Mingchen Ba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Consumption of Sweet Beverages and Cancer Risk. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fjorida Llaha ◽  
Mercedes Gil-Lespinard ◽  
Pelin Unal ◽  
Izar de Villasante ◽  
Jazmin Castañeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Significant Positive Association ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Risk ◽  
Sweetened Beverages

The consumption of sweet beverages, including sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), artificially sweetened beverages (ASB) and fruit juices (FJ) is associated with the risk of different cardiometabolic diseases and probably with some tumors as well. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies aimed at evaluating the association between sweet beverage intake and different types of cancer risk. Suitable papers published up to June 2020 were searched through PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases, using relevant keywords. Overall, 64 studies were identified for the systematic review, of which 27 were selected for the meta-analysis. This was performed by analyzing the multivariable-adjusted OR, RR or HR of the highest compared with the lowest sweet beverage intake categories. Random effects showed significant positive association between SSBs intake and breast (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01 – 1.30) and prostate cancer risk (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10 – 1.27), also between FJs and prostate cancer risk (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01 – 1.05). Associations between SSBs and colorectal and pancreatic cancer risk, FJs and breast, colorectal and pancreatic cancer risk, ASBs and pancreatic cancer risk tended to be positive but did not reach the statistically significant threshold. This study supports the recommendation to limit the consumption of SSBs and FJs for cancer prevention and proposes to further investigate the potential harmful role of ASBs intake in cancer risk.

Gastrectomy and risk of pancreatic cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 1279-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanfeng Gong ◽  
Quanbo Zhou ◽  
Yu Zhou ◽  
Qing Lin ◽  
Bing Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Consumption of Sweet Beverages and Cancer Risk. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 516
Author(s):  
Fjorida Llaha ◽  
Mercedes Gil-Lespinard ◽  
Pelin Unal ◽  
Izar de Villasante ◽  
Jazmín Castañeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Significant Positive Association ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Risk ◽  
Sweetened Beverages

The consumption of sweet beverages, including sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), artificial-sweetened beverages (ASB) and fruit juices (FJ), is associated with the risk of different cardiometabolic diseases. It may also be linked to the development of certain types of tumors. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies aimed at examining the association between sweet beverage intake and cancer risk. Suitable articles published up to June 2020 were sourced through PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases. Overall, 64 studies were identified, of which 27 were selected for the meta-analysis. This was performed by analyzing the multivariable-adjusted OR, RR or HR of the highest sweet beverage intake categories compared to the lowest one. Random effects showed significant positive association between SSB intake and breast (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01–1.30) and prostate cancer risk (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10–1.27) and also between FJs and prostate cancer risk (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01–1.05). Although the statistically significant threshold was not reached, there tended to be positive associations for the following: SSBs and colorectal and pancreatic cancer risk; FJs and breast, colorectal and pancreatic cancer risk; and ASBs and pancreatic cancer risk. This study recommends limiting sweet beverage consumption. Furthermore, we propose to establish a homogeneous classification of beverages and investigate them separately, to better understand their role in carcinogenesis.

scholarly journals Dietary Fiber Intake and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (21) ◽  
pp. 11556
Author(s):  
Daniele Nucci ◽  
Omar Santangelo ◽  
Sandro Provenzano ◽  
Cristina Fatigoni ◽  
Mariateresa Nardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Fiber Intake ◽  
Dietary Fiber Intake ◽  
Incident Cases

The burden of pancreatic cancer varies greatly across countries, with the number of deaths, incident cases, and disability-adjusted life years more than doubling in recent years, and with high-income countries having the highest incidence and mortality rates. We conducted this systematic review with meta-analysis with the goal of summarizing the current evidence on dietary fiber intake and its role in reducing the risk of pancreatic cancer, given the importance of identifying risk factors. This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. The structured literature search was conducted on PubMed/Medline and Scopus, combining free text words and medical subject headings. Our review contained 18 records at the end of the process. Our results show that dietary fiber intake reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer. When the analysis was differentiated according to the type of fiber considered, sub-grouped by gender (reduction of around 60% among women), and when case-control studies were conducted, the strength of the association increased. Clinicians and policymakers should improve interventions to raise the population’s awareness regarding the consumption of high-fiber diets, both in practice and in terms of public health policy.

Body mass index and mortality in patients with pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15293-e15293
Author(s):  
Arjun Gupta ◽  
Kaustav Majumder ◽  
Nivedita Arora ◽  
Shiraj Sen ◽  
Harris V. K. Naina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis

The association between dietary inflammatory index and risk of central obesity in adults: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 535-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi ◽  
Mahdi Vajdi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Central Obesity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Weighted Mean Difference ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dietary Factors ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Inflammatory Status ◽  
Obesity Indices

Abstract. Backgrounds: Central obesity, as a pivotal component of metabolic syndrome is associated with numerous co-morbidities. Dietary factors influence central obesity by increased inflammatory status. However, recent studies didn’t evaluate the association between central obesity and dietary inflammation index (DII®) that give score to dietary factors according to their inflammatory potential. In the current systematic review and meta-analysis, we summarized the studies that investigated the association between DII® with central obesity indices in the general populations. Methods: In a systematic search from PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Sciences and Cochrane electronic databases, we collected relevant studies written in English and published until 30 October 2019. The population of included studies were apparently healthy subjects or individuals with obesity or obesity-related diseases. Observational studies that evaluated the association between DII® and indices of central obesity including WC or WHR were included. Results: Totally thirty-two studies were included; thirty studies were cross-sectional and two were cohort studies with 103071 participants. Meta-analysis of observational studies showed that higher DII® scores were associated with 1.81 cm increase in WC (Pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) = 1.813; CI: 0.785–2.841; p = 0.001). Also, a non-significant increase in the odds of having higher WC (OR = 1.162; CI: 0.95–1.43; p = 0.154) in the highest DII category was also observed. In subgroup analysis, the continent, dietary assessment tool and gender were the heterogeneity sources. Conclusion: The findings proposed that adherence to diets with high DII® scores was associated with increased WC. Further studies with interventional designs are necessary to elucidate the causality inference between DII® and central obesity indices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document