Racial disparities in routine health checkup and adherence to cancer screening guidelines among women in the United States of America

Author(s):  
Amarachukwu F. Orji ◽  
Takashi Yamashita
2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Robin Yabroff ◽  
Andrew Freedman ◽  
Martin L Brown ◽  
Rachel Ballard-Barbash ◽  
Timothy McNeel ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. e125-e134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Soneji ◽  
Katrina Armstrong ◽  
David A. Asch

Whether the United States is able to equitably meet future demand for colorectal cancer screening may depend on access, physician supply, and organization of the health care system.


2018 ◽  
Vol 142 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melina B. Flanagan

Context.— The most recent update to cervical cancer screening guidelines offers interim guidance on the use of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening, with algorithms for management of results. After decades of screening with pure cytology and a shorter time with adjunctive HPV or cotesting with Papanicolaou (Pap) test and HPV, this is a significant change to our screening methods. Objective.— To briefly review the history of cervical cancer screening, the evidence upon which these interim guidelines were based, the arguments for and against primary HPV testing, and the current state of the field. Data Sources.— Primary studies, review articles, and commentaries were reviewed. Conclusions.— While there is evidence both for and against primary HPV testing, there are a growing number of countries adopting the practice. It would be worthwhile to be informed and prepared for such a change in the United States as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document