Calculation of the bulk flow rate of gas–air mixtures discharged from steel-smelting dc arc furnaces

2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 624-626
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Valdberg ◽  
M. Ya. Kaplun
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 861-868
Author(s):  
Javaria Farooq ◽  
Jae Dong Chung ◽  
Muhammad Mushtaq ◽  
Dianchen Lu ◽  
Muhammad Ramazan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Matthew Weathered ◽  
Jordan Rein ◽  
Mark Anderson ◽  
Paul Brooks ◽  
Bryan Coddington

This study characterized the magnitude, spatial profile, and frequency spectrum of thermal striping at a junction using a novel sodium-deployable optical fiber temperature sensor. Additionally, this study revealed for the first time the capability of performing cross correlation velocimetry (CCV) with an optical fiber to acquire fluid flow rates in a pipe. Optical fibers were encapsulated in stainless steel capillary tubes with an inert cover gas for high-temperature sodium deployment. Plots of temperature oscillation range as a function of two-dimensional space highlighted locations prone to mechanical failure for particular flow momentum ratios. The effect of inlet sodium temperature differential and bulk flow rate on thermal striping behavior was also explored. The power spectral density (PSD) revealed that the striping temperature oscillations occurred at frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 6 Hz. Finally, the bulk flow rate of liquid sodium was calculated from thermal striping's periodic temperature oscillations using cross correlation velocimetry for flow rates of 0.25–5.74 L/min.


Author(s):  
Brian Bayly

As in Chapter 2, so again here the intention is to review ideas that are already familiar, rather than to introduce the unfamiliar; to build a springboard, but not yet to leap off into space. The familiar idea is of flow down a gradient—water running downhill. Parallels are electric current in a wire, salt diffusing inland from the sea, heat flowing from the fevered brow into the cool windowpane, and helium diffusing through the membrane of a helium balloon. For any of these, we can imagine a linear relation: . . . Flow rate across a unit area = (conductivity) x (driving gradient) . . . where the conductivity retains a constant value, and if the other two quantities change, they do so in a strictly proportional way. Real life is not always so simple, but this relation serves to introduce the right quantities, some suitable units and some orders of magnitude. For present purposes, the second and fourth of the examples listed are the most relevant. To make comparison easier we imagine a barrier through which salt can diffuse and through which water can percolate, but we imagine circumstances such that only one process occurs at a time. Specifically, imagine a lagoon separated from the ocean by a manmade dike of gravel and sand 4 m thick, as in Figure 3.1. If the lagoon is full of seawater but the water levels on the two sides of the dike are unequal, water will percolate through the dike, whereas if the levels are the same and the dike is saturated but the lagoon is fresh water, salt will diffuse through but there will be no bulk flow of water. (More correctly, because seawater and fresh water have different densities, and because of other complications, the condition of no net water flow would be achieved in circumstances a little different from what was just stated. For present purposes all we need is the idea that conditions exist where water does not percolate but salt does diffuse.) For flow of water driven by a pressure gradient, suitable units are shown in the upper part of Table 3.1 and for diffusion of salt driven by a concentration gradient, suitable units are shown in the lower part.


Metallurgist ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 57-58
Author(s):  
M. K. Zakamarkin ◽  
V. S. Malinovskii ◽  
M. M. Krutyanskii ◽  
M. M. Lipovetskii
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (6) ◽  
pp. 443-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Elizarov ◽  
M. M. Krutyanskii ◽  
I. S. Nekhamin ◽  
S. M. Nekhamin
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1869-1876 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Carpinelli ◽  
F. Iacovone ◽  
A. Russo ◽  
P. Varilone

Refractories ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 23 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 553-555
Author(s):  
V. M. Soifer ◽  
N. I. Mosolova ◽  
T. G. Bogomolova ◽  
V. S. Kozlova

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 418-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Yu. Kochnov ◽  
L. A. Shul’ts ◽  
Yu. M. Kochnov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document