scholarly journals Anomalous Anglophones? Contours of free market ideology, political polarization, and climate change attitudes in English-speaking countries, Western European and post-Communist states

2018 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Keith Smith ◽  
Adam Mayer
2013 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray Levine ◽  
Adeline Levine
Keyword(s):  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e0207237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Gareau ◽  
Xiaorui Huang ◽  
Tara Pisani Gareau

MaRBLe ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roelien Van der Wel

This paper discusses different strategies of climate change denial and focusses on the specific case of Dutch politician Thierry Baudet. Much of the literature concerning climate change denial focusses on Anglo-American cases, therefore more research non-English speaking countries is necessary. The theoretical framework describes the state of the art concerning climate change denialism and its links to occurring phenomena in Western societies and politics such as post-truth and populism. Afterwards, by conducting a deductive analysis of  Thierry Baudet’s climate denialism in the Netherlands, a more thorough understanding of the different strategies proposed by Stefan Rahmstorf  and Engels et al. is reached. Although all four categories are detected in Baudet’s denialism, consensus denial seems to be the most prevalent. The analysis of his usage of the notion of a climate apocalypse, combined with the analysis of his specific focus on consensus denial, broadens the understanding of how climate change denial can relate to populism. 


2021 ◽  
pp. 1532673X2110532
Author(s):  
Jason Gainous ◽  
Melissa K. Merry

Research suggests that framing climate change as a national security issue can shape opinion about climate change. This research is less clear about what exactly constitutes a “national security frame” and what aspects of this frame are most persuasive. We use a survey experiment to compare the relative effects of three types of national security frames we identify. Results show that a frame centered on energy dependence had the strongest effect and was the most consistent across partisanship. Surprisingly, the effects ran in the opposite direction for Democrats and Republicans on both outcomes—negative for Democrats and positive for Republicans. We also show that the energy dependence frame moderated the influence of respondents’ affect toward political candidates and parties on their climate change attitudes. The results suggest that the energy dependence frame can shape public opinion, but that it must be tailored to particular audiences to avoid backfire effects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 162 (3) ◽  
pp. 1613-1636
Author(s):  
Brian J. Gareau ◽  
Xiaorui Huang ◽  
Tara Pisani Gareau ◽  
Sandra DiDonato

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Peters-Burton ◽  
Vanessa Schweizer ◽  
Sara Cobb ◽  
Edward Maibach

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document