Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Within DSM-5 Framework: Test of Reliability and Validity in Chinese Children

Author(s):  
Kelly Y. C. Lai ◽  
Emily C. W. Yuen ◽  
Se Fong Hung ◽  
Patrick W. L. Leung
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S459-S460
Author(s):  
R. Ferrara ◽  
M. Esposito

IntroductionRecent studies on autism concern the number of individuals diagnosed with pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) according to DSM-IV-TR who may no longer qualify for diagnoses under the new DSM-5 autism spectrum disorder (ASD). ASD is diagnosed using the impairments in two dimensions:– the social and communication dimension;– the restricted and repetitive interests and behaviors (RRIB) dimension whereas PDD is diagnosed using impairments in three dimensions.All the studies indicate between 50 and 75% of individuals will maintain diagnoses.ObjectivesThe aim of the study is to quantify how many individuals with previous PDD diagnoses under DSM-IV-TR criteria would maintain a diagnosis of ASD under DSM-5 criteria.MethodsOur sample consists of 23 cases (21 males, 2 female) related to the treatment Centre “Una breccia nel muro” of Rome and Salerno. All the cases previous received a PDD diagnose according to DSM-IV TR criteria. The mean age of cases was 7.7 years. All the cases were diagnosed by our team according to DSM-5 criteria, clinicians also used to make diagnoses: the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2, the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised.ResultsEighty-seven percent of cases with PDD were classified as ASD using DSM-5 criteria. Thirteen percent of cases, that previous received an Asperger diagnose, did not meet the ASD criteria (Fig. 1).ConclusionsDSM-5 criteria may easily exclude cases with high functioning from ASD because they tend to be atypical for ASD according to this study.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 643-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji J. Tsuchiya ◽  
Kaori Matsumoto ◽  
Atsuko Yagi ◽  
Naoko Inada ◽  
Miho Kuroda ◽  
...  

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Zimmerman

During the past two decades, a number of studies have found that depressed patients frequently have manic symptoms intermixed with depressive symptoms. While the frequency of mixed syndromes are more common in bipolar than in unipolar depressives, mixed states are also common in patients with major depressive disorder. The admixture of symptoms may be evident when depressed patients present for treatment, or they may emerge during ongoing treatment. In some patients, treatment with antidepressant medication might precipitate the emergence of mixed states. It would therefore be useful to systematically inquire into the presence of manic/hypomanic symptoms in depressed patients. We can anticipate that increased attention will likely be given to mixed depression because of changes in the DSM–5. In the present article, I review instruments that have been utilized to assess the presence and severity of manic symptoms and therefore could be potentially used to identify the DSM–5 mixed-features specifier in depressed patients and to evaluate the course and outcome of treatment. In choosing which measure to use, clinicians and researchers should consider whether the measure assesses both depression and mania/hypomania, assesses all or only some of the DSM–5 criteria for the mixed-features specifier, or assesses manic/hypomanic symptoms that are not part of the DSM–5 definition. Feasibility, more so than reliability and validity, will likely determine whether these measures are incorporated into routine clinical practice.


Autism ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 545-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gnakub Norbert Soke ◽  
Amy Philofsky ◽  
Carolyn Diguiseppi ◽  
Dennis Lezotte ◽  
Sally Rogers ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Zander ◽  
Charlotte Willfors ◽  
Steve Berggren ◽  
Christina Coco ◽  
Anette Holm ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Zhang ◽  
Zhaorui Liu ◽  
Guohua Li ◽  
Yueqin Huang ◽  
Yanxiang Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study aimed to describe the prevalence and lifetime criteria profiles of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder (AUD) and the transitions from alcohol use to disorder in Chifeng, China. Methods Face-to-face interviews were conducted using Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 (CIDI-3.0) among 4528 respondents in Chifeng. Results The weighted lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-5 AUD were 3.03 and 1.05%, respectively. Mild lifetime AUD was the most prevalent severity level (69.53%). The two most common criteria were “failure to quit/cutdown” and “drinking more or for longer than intended.” Lifetime prevalence was 65.59% for alcohol use, and 22.97% for regular drinking. Male and domestic violence were risk factors for the transition from alcohol use to regular drinking or AUD and from regular drinking to AUD. Younger age was risk factor for the transition to AUD from alcohol use or regular drinking. Poverty (OR = 2.49) was risk factor for the transition from alcohol use to regular drinking. The earlier drinkers were more likely to develop to regular drinking (OR = 2.11). Conclusion AUD prevalence in Chifeng was not as high as that in Western countries. The study revealed that multiple risk factors might contribute to the transition across different stages of alcohol use. Further research should explore the underlying mechanisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document