The diagnostic assessment research tool in action: A preliminary evaluation of a semistructured diagnostic interview for DSM-5 disorders.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke H. Schneider ◽  
Elizabeth J. Pawluk ◽  
Irena Milosevic ◽  
Philippe Shnaider ◽  
Karen Rowa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Research Tool ◽  
Diagnostic Assessment ◽  
Preliminary Evaluation ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Assessment Research

An Evaluation of the Diagnostic Assessment Research Tool (DART) Screener for DSM-5 Disorders

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Pawluk ◽  
Natalia Musielak ◽  
Irena Milosevic ◽  
Karen Rowa ◽  
Philippe Shnaider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Tool ◽  
Diagnostic Assessment ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Assessment Research

ADHD in adults

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Kooij ◽  
Philip Asherson ◽  
Michael Rösler
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Picture ◽  
Adult Adhd ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Diagnostic Assessment ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
Collateral Information ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Spectrum Disorders ◽  
Instructions For Use

In this chapter, the diagnostic assessment of ADHD in adults is described, starting with the clinical picture, such as the symptoms and the areas of impairment. To start the diagnostic process, screening instruments may be used. During diagnostic assessment, collateral information and neuropsychological tests have their role. The assessment of frequently occurring comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders, such as mood, anxiety, sleep, personality, and autism spectrum disorders, as well as addiction, is necessary to complete the clinical picture. Also, differential diagnosis is part of the diagnostic process. Finally, the Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in adults (DIVA 2.0), and the Conners Adult ADHD Diagnostic Interview (CAADID) are described and discussed. Instructions for use of the DIVA are given. The adjustments in the DSM-5 criteria for ADHD, and the next edition of DIVA based on the DSM-5 criteria, DIVA-5, are described.

Diagnostic Assessment Research Tool

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. McCabe ◽  
◽  
I. Milosevic ◽  
K. Rowa ◽  
P. Shnaider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Tool ◽  
Diagnostic Assessment ◽  
Assessment Research

scholarly journals Correlates of transitions from alcohol use to disorder diagnosed by DSM-5 in China

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Zhang ◽  
Zhaorui Liu ◽  
Guohua Li ◽  
Yueqin Huang ◽  
Yanxiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Composite International Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Multiple Risk Factors ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Common Criteria ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

Abstract Background This study aimed to describe the prevalence and lifetime criteria profiles of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder (AUD) and the transitions from alcohol use to disorder in Chifeng, China. Methods Face-to-face interviews were conducted using Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 (CIDI-3.0) among 4528 respondents in Chifeng. Results The weighted lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-5 AUD were 3.03 and 1.05%, respectively. Mild lifetime AUD was the most prevalent severity level (69.53%). The two most common criteria were “failure to quit/cutdown” and “drinking more or for longer than intended.” Lifetime prevalence was 65.59% for alcohol use, and 22.97% for regular drinking. Male and domestic violence were risk factors for the transition from alcohol use to regular drinking or AUD and from regular drinking to AUD. Younger age was risk factor for the transition to AUD from alcohol use or regular drinking. Poverty (OR = 2.49) was risk factor for the transition from alcohol use to regular drinking. The earlier drinkers were more likely to develop to regular drinking (OR = 2.11). Conclusion AUD prevalence in Chifeng was not as high as that in Western countries. The study revealed that multiple risk factors might contribute to the transition across different stages of alcohol use. Further research should explore the underlying mechanisms.

Latent Class Analysis of DSM-5 Criteria for Opioid Use Disorders: Results from the Iranian National Survey on Mental Health

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Javad Tarrahi ◽  
Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar ◽  
Hojjat Zeraati ◽  
Seyed Abbas Motevalian ◽  
Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Composite International Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Opioid Users

Background: Assessments of DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria with sample populations of opioid users are limited. This study aimed to determine the number of latent classes in opioid users and assessment of the proposed revisions to the DSM-5 opioid use disorder (OUD) criteria. Methods: Data came from the 2011 Iranian National Mental Health Survey (IranMHS) on 7,886 participants aged 15-64 years living in Iran. We used the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) version 2.1 in all respondents who indicated using opioids at least 5 times in the previous 12 months (n = 236). Results: A three-class model provided the best fit of all the models tested. Classes showed a spectrum of severity that was compatible with the DSM-5 classification. ‘Legal problems' and ‘desire to cut down' showed poor discrimination between classes. The weighted prevalence of OUD using DSM-5 was 20.7% higher than with DSM-IV. Conclusions: Results support the grouping based on severity of symptoms, combining abuse and dependence into a single diagnosis, omitting legal problems, and addition of craving as a new criterion.

Reliability, Criterion and Concurrent Validity of the Farsi Translation of DIVA-5: A Semi-Structured Diagnostic Interview for Adults With ADHD

2020 ◽  
pp. 108705472093081
Author(s):  
Lida Zamani ◽  
Zahra Shahrivar ◽  
Javad Alaghband-Rad ◽  
Vandad Sharifi ◽  
Elham Davoodi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adult Adhd ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Clinical Interviews ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic ◽  
Adult Outpatient

Objectives: This study evaluated the psychometrics of the Farsi translation of diagnostic interview for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults (DIVA-5) based on DSM-5 criteria. Methods: Referrals to a psychiatric outpatient clinic ( N = 120, 61.7% males, mean age 34.35 ± 9.84 years) presenting for an adult ADHD (AADHD) diagnosis, were evaluated using the structured clinical interviews for DSM-5 (SCID-5 & SCID-5-PD) and the DIVA-5. The participants completed Conner’s Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Self Report-Screening Version (CAARS-S-SV). Results: According to the SCID-5 and DIVA-5 diagnoses, 55% and 38% of the participants had ADHD, respectively. Diagnostic agreement was 81.66% between DIVA-5/SCID-5 diagnoses, 80% between SCID-5/CAARS-S-SV, and 71.66% between DIVA-5/CAARS-S-SV. Test–retest and inter-rater reliability results for the DIVA-5 were good to excellent. Conclusion: Findings support the validity and reliability of the Farsi translation of DIVA-5 among the Farsi-speaking adult outpatient population.

Psychometric Properties of a Structured Diagnostic Interview for DSM-5 Anxiety, Mood, and Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders

Assessment ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Tolin ◽  
Christina Gilliam ◽  
Bethany M. Wootton ◽  
William Bowe ◽  
Laura B. Bragdon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Reliability Data ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Structured Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Three hundred sixty-two adult patients were administered the Diagnostic Interview for Anxiety, Mood, and OCD and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders (DIAMOND). Of these, 121 provided interrater reliability data, and 115 provided test–retest reliability data. Participants also completed a battery of self-report measures that assess symptoms of anxiety, mood, and obsessive-compulsive and related disorders. Interrater reliability of DIAMOND anxiety, mood, and obsessive-compulsive and related diagnoses ranged from very good to excellent. Test–retest reliability of DIAMOND diagnoses ranged from good to excellent. Convergent validity was established by significant between-group comparisons on applicable self-report measures for nearly all diagnoses. The results of the present study indicate that the DIAMOND is a promising semistructured diagnostic interview for DSM-5 disorders.

Diagnosing ADHD in Adults: An Examination of the Discriminative Validity of Neuropsychological Tests and Diagnostic Assessment Instruments

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1019-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Pettersson ◽  
Staffan Söderström ◽  
Kent W. Nilsson
Keyword(s):  
Neuropsychological Tests ◽  
Adult Adhd ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Diagnostic Assessment ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Discriminative Ability ◽  
Discriminative Validity ◽  
Good Ability

Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the discriminative validity of neuropsychological tests and diagnostic assessment instruments in diagnosing adult ADHD in a clinical psychiatric population. Method: Of 108 patients, 60 were diagnosed with ADHD. The Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in adults (DIVA 2.0) and Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) v.1.1 together with eight neuropsychological tests were investigated. Results: All instruments showed poor discriminative ability except for the DIVA, which showed a relatively good ability to discriminate between the groups (sensitivity = 90.0; specificity = 72.9). A logistic regression analysis model with the DIVA and measures of inattention, impulsivity, and activity from continuous performance tests (CPTs) showed a sensitivity of 90.0 and a specificity of 83.3. Conclusion: Neuropsychological tests have a poor ability to discriminate between patients diagnosed with ADHD and patients not diagnosed with ADHD, but variables from CPT tests can contribute to increasing the specificity by 10% if used in combination with the DIVA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document