scholarly journals Non-invasive electrical cardiometry cardiac output monitoring during prehospital helicopter emergency medical care: a feasibility study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelis Slagt ◽  
Sjoerd Servaas ◽  
Rein Ketelaars ◽  
Geert-Jan van Geffen ◽  
Marijn Cornelia Theresia Tacken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Electrical Cardiometry ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Cardiac Output Measurements

Abstract Purpose Introducing advanced hemodynamic monitoring might be beneficial during Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) care. However, it should not increase the on-scene-time, it should be easy to use and should be non-invasive. The goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility of non-invasive cardiac output measurements by electrical cardiometry (EC) and the quality of the EC signal during pre-hospital care provided by our HEMS. Methods A convenience sample of fifty patients who required HEMS assistance were included in this study. Problems with respect to connecting the patient, entering patient characteristics and measuring were inventoried. Quality of EC signal of the measurements was assessed during prehospital helicopter care. We recorded the number of measurements with a signal quality indicator (SQI) ≥ 80 and the number of patients having at least 1 measurement with a SQI ≥ 80. Furthermore, the SQI value distribution of the measurements within each patient was analysed. Results In the experience of the attending HEMS caregivers application of the device was easy and did not result in increased duration of on-scene time. Patch adhesion was reported as a concern due to clammy skin in 22% of all cases. 684 measurements were recorded during HEMS care. In 47 (94%) patients at least 1 measurement with an SQI ≥ 80 was registered. Of all recorded measurements 5.8% had an SQI < 40, 11.4% had an SQI 40–59, 14.9% had a SQI between 60 and 79 and 67.8% had SQI ≥ 80. Conclusion Cardiac output measurements are feasible during prehospital HEMS care with good quality of the EC signal. Monitoring was easy to use and quick to install. In our view it is an promising candidate for the prehospital setting. Further research is needed to determine its clinical value during clinical decision making.

Comparison of continuous with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 460-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
CE Ditmyer ◽  
M Shively ◽  
DB Burns ◽  
RT Reichman
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Continuous Cardiac Output ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Monitoring Method ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Thermodilution Cardiac Output ◽  
Intermittent Bolus ◽  
Thermodilution Method ◽  
Cardiac Output Measurements

BACKGROUND: Few complete studies have been published to validate the agreement between continuous cardiac output and intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the agreement between cardiac output measurements by the continuous thermodilution method and the intermittent bolus thermodilution method, using a continuous cardiac output catheter in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients. METHODS: A convenience sample of 14 adult cardiothoracic surgical patients with thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters placed preoperatively was used. A total of 214 comparison measurements of cardiac output by both the continuous and intermittent thermodilution methods were taken on patient admission to the critical care unit, every 4 hours, and with any change greater than 10% from baseline readings. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation between continuous cardiac output and intermittent cardiac output was .89. The limits of agreement were -1.34 to 1.18 L/min, indicating that in 95% of readings the difference between continuous cardiac output and intermittent cardiac output were within this range. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous cardiac output monitoring method shows clinically acceptable agreement with the intermittent cardiac output method.

scholarly journals Continuous non-invasive cardiac output monitoring during exercise: validation of electrical cardiometry with Fick and thermodilution methods

2016 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.H. Liu ◽  
B.P. Dhakal ◽  
C. Keesakul ◽  
R.M. Kacmarek ◽  
G.D. Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Cardiac Output Monitoring ◽  
Electrical Cardiometry ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Output Monitoring

scholarly journals Feasibility of cardiac output measurements in critically ill patients by medical students

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert Koster ◽  
Thomas Kaufmann ◽  
Bart Hiemstra ◽  
Renske Wiersema ◽  
Madelon E. Vos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Poor Agreement ◽  
Cardiac Output Measurements

Abstract Background Critical care ultrasonography (CCUS) is increasingly applied also in the intensive care unit (ICU) and performed by non-experts, including even medical students. There is limited data on the training efforts necessary for novices to attain images of sufficient quality. There is no data on medical students performing CCUS for the measurement of cardiac output (CO), a hemodynamic variable of importance for daily critical care. Objective The aim of this study was to explore the agreement of cardiac output measurements as well as the quality of images obtained by medical students in critically ill patients compared to the measurements obtained by experts in these images. Methods In a prospective observational cohort study, all acutely admitted adults with an expected ICU stay over 24 h were included. CCUS was performed by students within 24 h of admission. CCUS included the images required to measure the CO, i.e., the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter and the velocity time integral (VTI) in the LVOT. Echocardiography experts were involved in the evaluation of the quality of images obtained and the quality of the CO measurements. Results There was an opportunity for a CCUS attempt in 1155 of the 1212 eligible patients (95%) and in 1075 of the 1212 patients (89%) CCUS examination was performed by medical students. In 871 out of 1075 patients (81%) medical students measured CO. Experts measured CO in 783 patients (73%). In 760 patients (71%) CO was measured by both which allowed for comparison; bias of CO was 0.0 L min−1 with limits of agreement of − 2.6 L min−1 to 2.7 L min−1. The percentage error was 50%, reflecting poor agreement of the CO measurement by students compared with the experts CO measurement. Conclusions Medical students seem capable of obtaining sufficient quality CCUS images for CO measurement in the majority of critically ill patients. Measurements of CO by medical students, however, had poor agreement with expert measurements. Experts remain indispensable for reliable CO measurements. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; registration number NCT02912624

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document