scholarly journals Physician Communication Coaching: How Psychologists can Elevate Skills and Support Resident Education, Professionalism, and Well-being

Author(s):  
Andrea Shamaskin-Garroway ◽  
Lauren DeCaporale-Ryan ◽  
Keisha Bell ◽  
Susan McDaniel
2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (48) ◽  
pp. 2011-2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Csenge Szeverényi ◽  
Zoltán Csernátony ◽  
Ágnes Balogh ◽  
Tünde Simon ◽  
Zoltán Kekecs ◽  
...  

Abstract: Introduction and aim: Hip and knee replacement surgery is very demanding for patients. Medication consumption is further increased by perioperative anxiety. Besides pain killer and anxiolytic medications, patients’ recovery can be enhanced by applying therapeutic suggestions, which are easily applicable during the patient–physician communication. Method: In our prospective, randomized, controlled study we examined the effects of positive suggestions on patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty in spinal anaesthesia. Members of the suggestion group received the therapeutic suggestions during a pre-surgery physician visit, and by listening to an audio recording during surgery. Results: Compared to the control group (n = 50), in the suggestion group (n = 45) the need of medication (pain killer and adjuvant pain medication) during the surgery was lower (p = 0.037), the mean change from baseline in the well-being of the patients was better on the 2nd [1.31 (0.57; 2.04); p<0.001] and 4th [0.97 (0.23; 1.7); p = 0.011] postoperative day and less transfusion had to be administered (OR: 2.37; p = 0.004). However, there was no difference between the two groups in the postoperative need of medications, in the length of hospitalisation and in the frequency of complications. Conslusion: Our results indicate that the administration of therapeutic suggestions in the perioperative period may be beneficial for orthopaedic surgery patients. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(48): 2011–2020.


2020 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana L. Crosby ◽  
Arun Sharma

Otolaryngology residency training programs are facing a novel challenge due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The widespread impact and chronicity of this pandemic makes it unique from any crisis faced by our training programs to date. This international medical crisis has the potential to significantly alter the course of training for our current resident cohort. The decrease in clinical opportunities due to the limitations on elective surgical cases and office visits as well as potential resident redeployment could lead to a decline in overall experience as well as key indicator cases. It is important that we closely monitor the impact of this pandemic on resident education and ensure the implementation of alternative learning strategies while maintaining an emphasis on safety and well-being.


PRiMER ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Hahn

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically impacted graduate medical education. Family medicine residents are now doing substantial clinical work and learning from home. We continued to offer academic half-day didactics virtually, but sensed a need for daily resident education and social support, so we implemented a virtual daily noon conference to address these needs. Methods: The virtual noon conferences used web-based technology and had weekly organ system themes with consistent daily learning activities like cases and review questions. Four key components made the conferences collaborative and inclusive; they were led by residents, required minimal preparation by using available materials, were interactive, and promoted social connection with wellness activities. We evaluated the impact on resident-perceived knowledge and wellness over 6 weeks with weekly surveys for residents attending at least one conference that week and a postintervention survey. Results: Of 66 responses to the weekly surveys, 98% agreed that noon conferences helped to increase knowledge and social connection. Of 46 total residents, 35 (76%) answered the postintervention survey, and all agreed that noon conferences helped to increase knowledge, were interactive, and increased social connection. Ninety-one percent favored continuing the noon conferences. More than three-quarters of postintervention survey respondents agreed that virtual noon conferences were equally or more beneficial compared to academic half days for both their education and well-being during the pandemic. Conclusions: Virtual noon conferences have provided regular interactive learning and fostered resident well-being during the pandemic. They can supplement resident curriculum and wellness and can be easily adopted by other programs.  


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Bolster ◽  
Liam Rourke

ABSTRACT Background Despite 25 years of implementation and a sizable amount of research, the impact of resident duty hour restrictions on patients and residents still is unclear. Advocates interpret the research as necessitating immediate change; opponents draw competing conclusions. Objective This study updates a systematic review of the literature on duty hour restrictions conducted 1 year prior to the implementation of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's 2011 regulations. Methods The review draws on reports catalogued in MEDLINE and PreMEDLINE from 2010 to 2013. Interventions that dealt with the duty hour restrictions included night float, shortened shifts, and protected time for sleep. Outcomes were patient care, resident well-being, and resident education. Studies were excluded if they were not conducted in patient care settings. Results Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Most frequently, the studies concluded that the restrictions had no impact on patient care (50%) or resident wellness (47%), and had a negative impact on resident education (64%). Night float was the most frequent means of implementing duty hour restrictions, yet it yielded the highest proportion of unfavorable findings. Conclusions This updated review, including 27 recent applicable studies, demonstrates that focusing on duty hours alone has not resulted in improvements in patient care or resident well-being. The added duty hour restrictions implemented in 2011 appear to have had an unintended negative impact on resident education. New approaches to the issue of physician fatigue and its relationship to patient care and resident education are needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (03) ◽  
pp. e267-e271
Author(s):  
Jared Johnson ◽  
Michael T. Chung ◽  
Michael A. Carron ◽  
Eleanor Y. Chan ◽  
Ho-Sheng Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a reduction in surgical and clinical volume, which has altered the traditional training experience of the otolaryngology resident. Objective To describe the strategies we utilized to maximize resident education as well as ensure patient and staff safety during the pandemic. Methods We developed a system that emphasized three key elements. First and foremost, patient care remained the core priority. Next, clinical duties were restructured to avoid unnecessary exposure of residents. The third component was ensuring continuation of resident education and maximizing learning experiences. Results To implement these key elements, our residency divided up our five hospitals into three functional groups based on geographical location and clinical volume. Each team works for three days at their assigned location before being replaced by the next three-person team at our two busiest sites. Resident teams are kept completely separate from each other, so that they do not interact with those working at other sites. Conclusions Despite the daily challenges encountered as we navigate through the COVID-19 pandemic, our otolaryngology residency program has been able to establish a suitable balance between maintenance of resident safety and well-being without compromise to patient care.


2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Zener ◽  
Daniele Wiseman

Purpose The study sought to assess how academic interventional radiologists determine and disclose to patients the intraprocedural role of radiology residents in the interventional radiology (IR) suite. Methods A qualitative study consisting of in-person interviews with 9 academic interventional radiologists from 3 hospitals was conducted. Interviews were transcribed, and underwent modified thematic analysis. Results Seven themes emerged. 1) Interventional radiologists permit residents to perform increasingly complex procedures with graded responsibility. While observed technical ability is important in determining the extent of resident participation, possessing good judgement and knowing personal limitations are paramount. 2) Interventional radiologists do not explicitly inform patients in detail about residents' intraprocedural role, as trainee involvement is viewed as implicit at academic institutions. 3) While patients are advised of resident participation in IR procedures, detailed disclosure of their role is viewed as potentially detrimental to both patient well-being and trainee education. 4) Interventional radiologists believe that patients might be less likely to refuse resident involvement if they meet them prior to procedures. 5) While it is rare that patients refuse resident participation in their care, interventional radiologists' duty to respect patient autonomy supersedes their obligation to resident education. 6) Interventional radiologists are responsible for any intraprocedural, trainee-related complication. 7) Trainees should be present when complications are disclosed to patients. Conclusion Interventional radiologists recognize the confidence placed in them, and they do not inform patients in detail about residents' role in IR procedures. Respecting patient autonomy is paramount, and while rare, obeying patients' wishes can potentially be at the expense of resident education.


1970 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Melvin ◽  
Sophie Corriveau ◽  
Aiman Alak ◽  
Ameen Patel

Residents are physicians undertaking further training to become independently licensed practitioners. Historically, resident duty hour periods were long and intense. The goal was to maximize learning through high patient volume and to teach doctors how to take responsibility. Recently, concerns over patient and resident safety have led to restricted trainee work hours. The putative justification is to improve resident education, resident well-being, and patient care. In light of this recent shift in the medical culture, resident duty hours have become a controversial topic. Restricted duty hours take many forms. In the United States, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandated junior residents work no longer than 16 consecutive hours, while senior residents could work up to 26 hours.1 In Canada, no nationwide mandate exists and the issue falls within provincial jurisdiction. In Ontario, under the Professional Association of Residents of Ontario agreement, call-periods are no more than 26 consecutive hours in-house, no more than one in four nights in-house, or no more than one in three nights of home-call. After a 2011 Quebec court ruling, resident duty hours were restricted to 16 consecutive hours in that province. This resulted from the court concluding that traditional hours violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Regardless, the Quebec ruling prompted other Canadian programs to further reduce resident duty hours and consecutive hours on-call. To better understand this complex issue, the following review discusses resident safety, resident performance, resident education, and patient safety. Our goal is to present a balanced, evidence-based discussion, addressing both patient safety and resident fatigue management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document