Preventive Health Services Delivery to South Asians in the United States

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 797-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazleen Bharmal ◽  
Saima Chaudhry
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Johnson ◽  
Chrisann Newransky ◽  
Dongmu Zhang ◽  
Kosuke Kawai ◽  
Camilo Acosta

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (20) ◽  
pp. 1-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Pazol ◽  
Cheryl L. Robbins ◽  
Lindsey I. Black ◽  
Katherine A. Ahrens ◽  
Kimberly Daniels ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin P Graham ◽  
Maureen L. Forrester ◽  
Jere A. Wysong ◽  
Thomas C. Rosenthal ◽  
Paul A. James

Author(s):  
Emily S. Miller ◽  
Rebekah Jensen ◽  
M. Camille Hoffman ◽  
Lauren M. Osborne ◽  
Katherine McEvoy ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim: Our objective was to integrate lessons learned from perinatal collaborative care programs across the United States, recognizing the diversity of practice settings and patient populations, to provide guidance on successful implementation. Background: Collaborative care is a health services delivery system that integrates behavioral health care into primary care. While efficacious, effectiveness requires rigorous attention to implementation to ensure adherence to the core evidence base. Methods: Implementation strategies are divided into three pragmatic stages: preparation, program launch, and program growth and sustainment; however, these steps are non-linear and dynamic. Findings: The discussion that follows is not meant to be prescriptive; rather, all implementation tasks should be thoughtfully tailored to the unique needs and setting of the obstetric community and patient population. In particular, we are aware that implementation on the level described here assumes commitment of both effort and money on the part of clinicians, administrators, and the health system, and that such financial resources are not always available. We conclude with synthesis of a survey of existing collaborative care programs to identify implementation practices of existing programs.


Author(s):  
Emmanuella N Asabor ◽  
Sten H Vermund

Abstract Tuberculosis incidence in the United States is declining, yet projections indicate that we will not eliminate tuberculosis in the 21st century. Incidence rates in regions serving the rural and urban poor, including recent immigrants, are well above the national average. People experiencing incarceration and homelessness represent additional key populations. Better engagement of marginalized populations will not succeed without first addressing the structural racism that fuels continued transmission. Examples include:(1)systematic underfunding of contact tracing in health departments serving regions where Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) live;(2) poor access to affordable care in state governments that refuse to expand insurance coverage to low-income workers through the Affordable Care Act;(3) disproportionate incarceration of BIPOC into crowded prisons with low tuberculosis screening rates; and(4) fear-mongering among immigrants that discourages them from accessing preventive health services. To eliminate tuberculosis, we must first eliminate racist policies that limit essential health services in vulnerable communities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document