Information contributed by meta-analysis in exposure–response modeling: application to phase 2 dose selection of guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuanpu Hu ◽  
Yasmine Wasfi ◽  
Yanli Zhuang ◽  
Honghui Zhou
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 705-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidal Al-Huniti ◽  
Hongmei Xu ◽  
Diansong Zhou ◽  
Sergey Aksenov ◽  
Robert Fox ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 2082-2086 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lebwohl ◽  
R.G. Langley ◽  
Y. Zhu ◽  
H. Zhou ◽  
M. Song ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis Chan ◽  
Jiajie Yu ◽  
Leslie Chinn ◽  
Marita Prohn ◽  
Jan Huisman ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Fenebrutinib (GDC-0853), a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor was investigated in a Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim was to apply a model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach to examine the totality of available clinical efficacy data. Methods Population pharmacokinetics (popPK) modeling, exposure-response (E-R) analysis, and model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) of fenebrutinib were performed based on the Phase 2 data. Results PopPK of fenebrutinib after oral administration was described using a 3-compartment model with linear elimination and a flexible absorption transit compartment model. Healthy subjects had a 52% higher apparent clearance than patients. E-R analyses based on longitudinal ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 and DAS28 (CRP) data modeled fenebrutinib effect with an Emax function, and an efficacy plateau was achieved within the exposure range obtained in the Phase 2 clinical trial. Based on literature data, a summary-level clinical efficacy database was constructed, and MBMA determined ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responder rates in the placebo and adalimumab arms of the Phase 2 clinical trial were found to be consistent with historical data for these treatments. Conclusions Our multi-pronged approach applied MIDD to maximize knowledge extraction of efficacy data and enabled robust interpretation from a Phase 2 clinical trial.


2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 780-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Benson ◽  
David Berry ◽  
James Lockey ◽  
William Brattin ◽  
Timothy Hilbert ◽  
...  

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen Lin Chia ◽  
Linda Santiago ◽  
Bing Wang ◽  
Denison Kuruvilla ◽  
Shiliang Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The randomized, double-blind, phase 2 b MUSE study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the type I interferon receptor antibody anifrolumab (300 mg or 1000 mg every 4 weeks) compared with placebo for 52 weeks in patients with chronic, moderate to severe SLE. Characterizing the exposure–response relationship of anifrolumab in MUSE will enable selection of its optimal dosage regimen in two phase 3 studies in patients with SLE. Methods The exposure–response relationship, pharmacokinetics (PK), and SLE Responder Index (SRI[4]) efficacy data were analysed using a population approach. A dropout hazard function was also incorporated into the SRI(4) model to describe the voluntary patient withdrawals during the 1-year treatment period. Results The population PK model found that type I IFN test–high patients, and patients with a higher body weight, had significantly greater clearance of anifrolumab. Stochastic clinical simulations demonstrated that doses <300 mg would lead to a greater-than-proportional reduction in drug exposure owing to type I interferon alpha receptor–mediated drug clearance (antigen-sink effect, more rapid drug clearance at lower concentrations) and suboptimal SRI(4) responses with wider confidence intervals. Conclusions Based on PK, efficacy, and safety considerations, anifrolumab 300 mg every 4 weeks was recommended as the optimal dosage for pivotal phase 3 studies in patients with SLE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document