Earthquake hazard and risk assessment based on Unified Scaling Law for Earthquakes: Greater Caucasus and Crimea

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 1157-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir G. Kossobokov ◽  
Anastasia K. Nekrasova
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Scaling Law ◽  
Earthquake Hazard ◽  
Greater Caucasus ◽  
Unified Scaling Law ◽  
Hazard And Risk ◽  
Hazard And Risk Assessment

Earthquake Hazard and Risk Assessment Based on Unified Scaling Law for Earthquakes: State of Gujarat, India

2017 ◽  
Vol 174 (3) ◽  
pp. 1441-1452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imtiyaz A. Parvez ◽  
Anastasia Nekrasova ◽  
Vladimir Kossobokov
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Scaling Law ◽  
Earthquake Hazard ◽  
Unified Scaling Law ◽  
Hazard And Risk ◽  
Hazard And Risk Assessment

scholarly journals Seismic hazard and risk assessment based on the unified scaling law for earthquakes

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Nekrasova ◽  
V. G. Kossobokov ◽  
I. A. Parvez ◽  
X. Tao
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Scaling Law ◽  
Unified Scaling Law ◽  
Hazard And Risk ◽  
Hazard And Risk Assessment

Earthquake hazard and risk assessment using machine learning approaches at Palu, Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 749 ◽  
pp. 141582
Author(s):  
Ratiranjan Jena ◽  
Biswajeet Pradhan ◽  
Ghassan Beydoun ◽  
Abdullah M. Alamri ◽  
Ardiansyah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Earthquake Hazard ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Hazard And Risk ◽  
Hazard And Risk Assessment

scholarly journals Earthquake hazard and risk assessment study for the Canterbury region, South Island, New Zealand

2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Kingsbury ◽  
Jarg R. Pettinga ◽  
Russ J. Van Dissen
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Earthquake Hazard ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
Assessment Study ◽  
Study Programme ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Hazard And Risk ◽  
Hazard And Risk Assessment ◽  
Civil Defence

In recognition of the earthquake threat to Canterbury, and its statutory responsibilities, Environment Canterbury initiated a comprehensive, staged multi-year earthquake hazard and risk assessment study programme in 1997. In this paper the general framework and philosophy behind Environment Canterbury's Earthquake Hazard and Risk Assessment Programme is outlined. The results of the stage 1A earthquake source characterisation, and stage 1B probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Canterbury region are presented in companion papers in this volume. The programme participants have ongoing earthquake hazard research projects, and also are involved as practitioners in land-use planning and development of relevance to the Canterbury region. The coordinated programme is primarily designed to facilitate the integration of a diverse range of independent studies, so making relevant earthquake hazard and risk information readily available to a wide range of end-users, including other professionals (engineers and scientists), planners, civil defence and emergency management staff, utility operators, and developers. In addition the programme provides up to date, relevant information for public education and awareness purposes. The first stage of the programme has been completed, and includes identification and characterisation of earthquake sources, probabilistic hazard assessment, and formulation of earthquake scenarios. The long-term staged study programme will address the earthquake hazard, the risks posed, possible mitigation options and mitigation implementation methods available.

scholarly journals Definitions and Concepts for Quantitative Rockfall Hazard and Risk Analysis

Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Didier Hantz ◽  
Jordi Corominas ◽  
Giovanni B. Crosta ◽  
Michel Jaboyedoff
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Failure Probability ◽  
Rockfall Hazard ◽  
Process Failure ◽  
Failure Propagation ◽  
Element At Risk ◽  
Hazard And Risk ◽  
Hazard And Risk Assessment ◽  
Definition Of

There is an increasing need for quantitative rockfall hazard and risk assessment that requires a precise definition of the terms and concepts used for this particular type of landslide. This paper suggests using terms that appear to be the most logic and explicit as possible and describes methods to derive some of the main hazards and risk descriptors. The terms and concepts presented concern the rockfall process (failure, propagation, fragmentation, modelling) and the hazard and risk descriptors, distinguishing the cases of localized and diffuse hazards. For a localized hazard, the failure probability of the considered rock compartment in a given period of time has to be assessed, and the probability for a given element at risk to be impacted with a given energy must be derived combining the failure probability, the reach probability, and the exposure of the element. For a diffuse hazard that is characterized by a failure frequency, the number of rockfalls reaching the element at risk per unit of time and with a given energy (passage frequency) can be derived. This frequency is relevant for risk assessment when the element at risk can be damaged several times. If it is not replaced, the probability that it is impacted by at least one rockfall is more relevant.

STUDY ON BISPHENOL F, A BISPHENOL A ANALOGUE, AT A DAIRY COMPANY: HEALTH HAZARD AND RISK ASSESSMENT

2021 ◽  
pp. 112334
Author(s):  
Serena Santonicola ◽  
Stefania Albrizio ◽  
Maria Carmela Ferrante ◽  
Mercogliano Raffaelina
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Bisphenol A ◽  
Health Hazard ◽  
Bisphenol F ◽  
Hazard And Risk ◽  
Hazard And Risk Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document