Interactive effects of vegetation and water table depth on belowground C and N mobilization and greenhouse gas emissions in a restored peatland

2020 ◽  
Vol 448 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 299-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Lazcano ◽  
Anoop S. Deol ◽  
Martin E. Brummell ◽  
Maria Strack
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ain Kull ◽  
Iuliia Burdun ◽  
Gert Veber ◽  
Oleksandr Karasov ◽  
Martin Maddison ◽  
...  

<p>Besides water table depth, soil temperature is one of the main drivers of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in intact and managed peatlands. In this work, we evaluate the performance of remotely sensed land surface temperature (LST) as a proxy of greenhouse gas emissions in intact, drained and extracted peatlands. For this, we used chamber-measured carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) data from seven peatlands in Estonia collected during vegetation season in 2017–2020. Additionally, we used temperature and water table depth data measured in situ. We studied relationships between CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, in-situ parameters and remotely sensed LST from Landsat 7 and 8, and MODIS Terra. Results of our study suggest that LST has stronger relationships with surface and soil temperature as well as with ecosystem respiration (R<sub>eco</sub>) over drained and extracted sites than over intact ones. Over the extracted cites the correlation between R<sub>eco</sub> CO<sub>2</sub> and LST is 0.7, and over the drained sites correlation is 0.5. In natural sites, we revealed a moderate positive relationship between LST and CO<sub>2</sub> emitted in hollows (correlation is 0.6) while it is weak in hummocks (correlation is 0.3). Our study contributes to the better understanding of relationships between greenhouse gas emissions and their remotely sensed proxies over peatlands with different management status and enables better spatial assessment of GHG emissions in drainage affected northern temperate peatlands.</p>


Geoderma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 346 ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Feng Liang ◽  
Jing An ◽  
Jun-Qin Gao ◽  
Xiao-Ya Zhang ◽  
Ming-Hua Song ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 318 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 229-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry J. Dinsmore ◽  
Ute M. Skiba ◽  
Michael F. Billett ◽  
Robert M. Rees

2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Víctor Manuel Ruíz-Valdiviezo ◽  
Marco Luna-Guido ◽  
Aurélie Galzy ◽  
Federico Antonio Gutiérrez-Miceli ◽  
Luc Dendooven

2006 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
H H Janzen ◽  
D A Angers ◽  
M. Boehm ◽  
M. Bolinder ◽  
R L Desjardins ◽  
...  

Greenhouse gas emissions from farms can be suppressed in two ways: by curtailing the release of these gases (especially N2O and CH4), and by storing more carbon in soils, thereby removing atmospheric CO2. But most practices have multiple interactive effects on emissions throughout a farm. We describe an approach for identifying practices that best reduce net, whole-farm emissions. We propose to develop a “Virtual Farm”, a series of interconnected algorithms that predict net emissions from flows of carbon, nitrogen, and energy. The Virtual Farm would consist of three elements: descriptors, which characterize the farm; algorithms, which calculate emissions from components of the farm; and an integrator, which links the algorithms to each other and the descriptors, generating whole-farm estimates. Ideally, the Virtual Farm will be: boundary-explicit, with single farms as the fundamental unit; adaptable to diverse farm types; modular in design; simple and transparent; dependent on minimal, attainable inputs; internally consistent; compatible with models developed elsewhere; and dynamic (“seeing”into the past and the future). The Virtual Farm would be constructed via two parallel streams - measurement and modeling - conducted iteratively. The understanding built into the Virtual Farm may eventually be applied to issues beyond greenhouse gas mitigation. Key words: CO2, N2O, CH4, agroecosystems, models, climate change


2019 ◽  
Vol 688 ◽  
pp. 1193-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Hoyos-Santillan ◽  
Barry H. Lomax ◽  
David Large ◽  
Benjamin L. Turner ◽  
Omar R. Lopez ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wantong Zhang ◽  
Jinzhi Wang ◽  
Zhengyi Hu ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Zhongqing Yan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 719 ◽  
pp. 135130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Wen ◽  
Huadong Zang ◽  
Qingxu Ma ◽  
Benjamin Freeman ◽  
David R. Chadwick ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document