scholarly journals Psychometric assessment of EQ-5D-5L and ReQoL measures in patients with anxiety and depression: construct validity and responsiveness

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Franklin ◽  
Angel Enrique ◽  
Jorge Palacios ◽  
Derek Richards
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Depression Severity ◽  
Value Set ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Anxiety Depression

Abstract Purpose Generic health measures have been questioned for quantifying mental-health-related outcomes. In patients with anxiety and/or depression, our aim is to assess the psychometric properties of the preference-based EQ-5D-5L (generic health) and ReQoL-UI (recovery-focussed quality of life) for economic evaluation against the PHQ-9 (depression) and GAD-7 (anxiety). EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression item and ReQoL-10 are also assessed. Methods A 2:1 (intervention: control) randomised controlled trial collected measures at baseline and 8 weeks post baseline; in the intervention arm, data were also collected 3, 6, 9, and 12-months post baseline. EQ-5D-5L preference-based scores were obtained from the value set for England (VSE) and ‘cross-walked’ EQ-5D-3L United Kingdom (UK) value set scores. ReQoL-UI preference-based scores were obtained from its UK value set as applied to seven ReQoL-10 items. EQ-5D-5L and ReQoL measures’ construct validity and responsiveness were assessed compared against PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores and group cut-offs. Results 361 people were randomised to intervention (241) or control (120). ReQoL-UI/-10 had better construct validity with depression severity than the EQ-5D-5L (VSE/cross-walk scores), which had relatively better construct validity with anxiety severity than the ReQoL-UI/-10. Across all intervention-arm time-points relative to baseline, responsiveness was generally better for EQ-5D-5L (VSE in particular) than ReQoL-UI, but worse than ReQoL-10. Conclusion There is insufficient evidence to recommend the ReQoL-UI over EQ-5D-5L for economic evaluations to capture anxiety severity. However, there may be rationale for recommending the ReQoL-UI over the EQ-5D-5L to capture depression severity given its better construct validity, albeit poorer responsiveness, and if recovery-focussed quality of life relative to condition-specific symptomology is the construct of interest.

scholarly journals The ‘Cancer Home-Life Intervention’: A randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an occupational therapy–based intervention in people with advanced cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 744-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Sampedro Pilegaard ◽  
Karen la Cour ◽  
Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard ◽  
Anna Thit Johnsen ◽  
Line Lindahl-Jacobsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Home Life ◽  
Everyday Activities ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background: People with advanced cancer face difficulties with their everyday activities at home that may reduce their health-related quality of life. To address these difficulties, we developed the ‘Cancer Home-Life Intervention’. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of the ‘Cancer Home Life-Intervention’ compared with usual care with regard to patients’ performance of, and participation in, everyday activities, and their health-related quality of life. Design and intervention: A randomised controlled trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02356627). The ‘Cancer Home-Life Intervention’ is a brief, tailored, occupational therapy–based and adaptive programme for people with advanced cancer targeting the performance of their prioritised everyday activities. Setting/participants: Home-living adults diagnosed with advanced cancer experiencing functional limitations were recruited from two Danish hospitals. They were assessed at baseline, and at 6 and 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome was activities of daily living motor ability. Secondary outcomes were activities of daily living process ability, difficulty performing prioritised everyday activities, participation restrictions and health-related quality of life. Results: A total of 242 participants were randomised either to the intervention group ( n = 121) or the control group ( n = 121). No effect was found on the primary outcome (between-group mean change: −0.04 logits (95% confidence interval: −0.23 to 0.15); p = 0.69). Nor was any effect on the secondary outcomes observed. Conclusion: In most cases, the ‘Cancer Home-Life Intervention’ was delivered through only one home visit and one follow-up telephone contact, which not was effective in maintaining or improving participants’ everyday activities and health-related quality of life. Future research should pay even more attention to intervention development and feasibility testing.

Acupuncture for pain, mandibular function and oral health‐related quality of life in patients with masticatory myofascial pain: A randomised controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 1193-1201
Author(s):  
Franklin Teixeira Salles‐Neto ◽  
Janice Simpson Paula ◽  
João Gabriel de Azevedo José Romero ◽  
Camila Megale Almeida‐Leite
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Myofascial Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Randomised Controlled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document