Changes in analyst following for less covered firms accompanying Regulation Fair Disclosure: the roles of ability and industry experience

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hueiling Chen ◽  
Cheng-Tsu Huang ◽  
Hsiou-Wei W. Lin
2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 1421-1452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus P. Kirk ◽  
James D. Vincent

ABSTRACT: This paper investigates the effect of investments in internal investor relations (IR) departments on firm outcomes. We find that companies initiating internal professional IR experience increases in disclosure, analyst following, institutional investor ownership, liquidity, and market valuation relative to a matched sample of control firms. We also examine the differential impact the exogenous shock of Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) had on firms with an established professional IR department. We find these IR firms more than doubled their level of public disclosure post-Reg FD. Despite IR firms losing a potential communications channel following Reg FD adoption, we find they did not suffer adversely and instead show a post-Reg FD increase in analyst following, institutional investors, and liquidity relative to a control sample of similar non-IR firms. This implies that the effectiveness of professionalized internal IR increased post-Reg FD consistent with IR firms being relatively better positioned to navigate the more complicated regulatory environment. JEL Classifications: D82; M41; G11; G12; G14; G24 Data Availability: Data are publicly available from the sources identified in the paper with the exception of the membership data from the National Investor Relations Institute, which is a proprietary dataset.


2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afshad J. Irani ◽  
Irene Karamanou

This paper presents preliminary evidence of the effect of Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD) on the quantity and quality of firm-specific information released to the market by comparing analyst forecast data from pre-FD to post-FD time periods. By prohibiting selective disclosure of material information to privileged individuals, the Securities and Exchange Commission intends to provide a level playing field to all investors. However, opponents argue that FD has a negative impact by decreasing the quantity and quality of publicly available information. Consistent with this argument, we document a decrease in analyst following and an increase in forecast dispersion following the passage of FD.


Author(s):  
Susan M. Albring ◽  
Monica L. Banyi ◽  
Dan S. Dhaliwal ◽  
Raynolde Pereira

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutao Li ◽  
Anthony Saunders ◽  
Pei Shao

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 1650014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter T. Elgers ◽  
May H. Lo ◽  
Wenjuan Xie ◽  
Le Emily Xu

This study addresses the impact of firm- and time-specific attributes on the accuracy of composite forecasts of annual earnings, constructed from time-series, price-based, and analysts' forecasts. The attributes examined include firm size, analysts' coverage, and time periods pre-dating and following the implementation of regulation fair disclosure. Our results indicate that the relative accuracy of the composite forecasts is time-specific. In the pre-regulation fair disclosure period, composite forecasts significantly outperform each of the three individual forecast sources. Moreover, the extent of improvement in accuracy of composite forecasts is significantly higher for the smaller and lightly-covered firms. Collectively, these results suggest that the predictive accuracy of composite forecasts is contextual.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document