Carbon Fiber Effect on Structure and Mechanical Properties of Polymer Composites Produced by Additive Manufacturing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Krinitсyn ◽  
Yu. V. Dontsov ◽  
V. A. Yurkina
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Polymer Composites

Anisotropic Material Behaviors of 3D Printed Carbon-Fiber Polymer Composites With Open-Source Printers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Garcia ◽  
Robert Harper ◽  
Y. Charles Lu
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Polymer Composites ◽  
Mechanical Responses ◽  
Manufacturing Technique ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
Traditional Manufacturing

Abstract Composite products are often created using traditional manufacturing methods such as compression or injection molding. Recently, additive manufacturing (3D printing) techniques have been used for fabricating composites. 3D printing is the process of producing three-dimensional parts through the successive combination of various layers of material. This layering effect in combination with exposure to ambient (or reduced) temperature and pressure cause the finished products to have inconsistent microstructures. The inconsistent microstructures along with the oriented reinforcing fibers create anisotropic parts with difficulty to predict mechanical properties. In this paper, the mechanical properties of fiber reinforced polymer composites produced by additive manufacturing technique (3D printing) and by traditional manufacturing technique (compression molding) were investigated. Three open-source 3D printers, i.e. FlashForge Dreamer, Tevo Tornado, and Prusa i3 Mk3, were used to fabricate bending samples from carbon-fiber reinforced ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene). Results showed that there exist significant discrepancies and anisotropies in mechanical properties of 3D printed composites. First, the properties vary greatly among parts made from different printers. Secondly, the mechanical responses of 3D printed parts strongly depend upon the orientations of the filaments. Parts with the infill oriented along the length of the specimens showed the most favorable mechanical responses such as Young’s modulus, maximum strength, and toughness. Thirdly, all 3D printed parts exhibit inferior properties to those made by conventional manufacturing. Finally, theoretical modeling has been attempted to predict the mechanical responses of 3D printed products and can potentially be used to “design” the 3D printing processes to achieve the optimal performance.

ANISOTROPIC MATERIAL BEHAVIORS OF 3D PRINTED CARBON-FIBER POLYMER COMPOSITES WITH OPEN-SOURCE PRINTERS

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jordan Garcia ◽  
Robert Harper ◽  
Y. Charles Lu
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Polymer Composites ◽  
Mechanical Responses ◽  
Manufacturing Technique ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
Traditional Manufacturing

Abstract Composite products are often created using traditional manufacturing methods such as compression or injection molding. Recently, additive manufacturing (3D printing) techniques have been used for fabricating composites. 3D printing is the process of producing three-dimensional parts through the successive combination of various layers of material. This layering effect in combination with exposure to ambient (or reduced) temperature and pressure cause the finished products to have inconsistent microstructures. The inconsistent microstructures along with the oriented reinforcing fibers create anisotropic parts with difficulty to predict mechanical properties. In this paper, the mechanical properties of fiber reinforced polymer composites produced by additive manufacturing technique (3D printing) and by traditional manufacturing technique (compression molding) were investigated. Three open-source 3D printers, i.e. FlashForge Dreamer, Tevo Tornado, and Prusa i3 Mk3, were used to fabricate bending samples from carbon-fiber reinforced ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene). Results showed that there exist significant discrepancies and anisotropies in mechanical properties of 3D printed composites. First, the properties vary greatly among parts made from different printers. Secondly, the mechanical responses of 3D printed parts strongly depend upon the orientations of the filaments. Parts with the infill oriented along the length of the specimens showed the most favorable mechanical responses such as Young's modulus, maximum strength, and toughness. Thirdly, all 3D printed parts exhibit inferior properties to those made by conventional manufacturing. Finally, theoretical modeling has been attempted to predict the mechanical responses of 3D printed products and can be used to “design” the 3D printing processes.

scholarly journals Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing

2014 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 144-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halil L. Tekinalp ◽  
Vlastimil Kunc ◽  
Gregorio M. Velez-Garcia ◽  
Chad E. Duty ◽  
Lonnie J. Love ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Polymer Composites ◽  
Carbon Fiber Polymer

scholarly journals Continuous Fiber Angle Topology Optimization for Polymer Composite Deposition Additive Manufacturing Applications

Fibers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delin Jiang ◽  
Robert Hoglund ◽  
Douglas Smith
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Topology Optimization ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Polymer Composite ◽  
Fiber Reinforcement ◽  
Fiber Direction ◽  
Optimization Approach ◽  
Continuous Fiber ◽  
Fiber Angle

Mechanical properties of parts produced with polymer deposition additive manufacturing (AM) depend on the print bead direction, particularly when short carbon-fiber reinforcement is added to the polymer feedstock. This offers a unique opportunity in the design of these structures since the AM print path can potentially be defined in a direction that takes advantage of the enhanced stiffness gained in the bead and, therefore, fiber direction. This paper presents a topology optimization approach for continuous fiber angle optimization (CFAO), which computes the best layout and orientation of fiber reinforcement for AM structures. Statically loaded structures are designed for minimum compliance where the adjoint variable method is used to compute design derivatives, and a sensitivity filter is employed to reduce the checkerboard effect. The nature of the layer-by-layer approach in AM is given special consideration in the algorithm presented. Examples are provided to demonstrate the applicability of the method in both two and three dimensions. The solution to our two dimensional problem is then printed with a fused filament fabrication (FFF) desktop printer using the material distribution results and a simple infill method which approximates the optimal fiber angle results using a contour-parallel deposition strategy. Mechanical stiffness testing of the printed parts shows improved results as compared to structures designed without accounting for the direction of the composite structure. Results show that the mechanical properties of the final FFF carbon fiber/polymer composite printed parts are greatly influenced by the print direction, and optimized material orientation tends to align with the imposed force direction to minimize the compliance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document