scholarly journals Evaluating the Uncertainties in the Electron Temperature and Radial Speed Measurements Using White Light Corona Eclipse Observations

Solar Physics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 289 (6) ◽  
pp. 2021-2039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson L. Reginald ◽  
Joseph M. Davila ◽  
O. C. St. Cyr ◽  
Lutz Rastaetter
1998 ◽  
Vol 167 ◽  
pp. 66-69
Author(s):  
A.N. Lebedev ◽  
I.A. Belenko ◽  
O.I. Bougaenko ◽  
I.S. Kim ◽  
O.T. Matsuura ◽  
...  

AbstractA polarization analysis of E–limb prominences on November 3, 1994 is presented. Photometry and data reduction of 24 prominence pictures based on IDL software and Stokes–vector presentation and applied to Hα emission resulted in an accuracy of 1–1.5% in determination of the polarization degree and of 1.5–2.0° in the polarization direction. Distributions of polarization degree (polarization images) for prominences and the “white light” corona are presented. A polarization degree of 2–5% for prominences and 10–25% for the nearby white light corona are found. The polarization direction is found to be tangential to the solar limb. It is noted that eclipse observations can provide a powerful method for deriving the magnetic field at high altitudes in the coronal volume.


1994 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
E. Hildner

AbstractOver the last twenty years, orbiting coronagraphs have vastly increased the amount of observational material for the whitelight corona. Spanning almost two solar cycles, and augmented by ground-based K-coronameter, emission-line, and eclipse observations, these data allow us to assess,inter alia: the typical and atypical behavior of the corona; how the corona evolves on time scales from minutes to a decade; and (in some respects) the relation between photospheric, coronal, and interplanetary features. This talk will review recent results on these three topics. A remark or two will attempt to relate the whitelight corona between 1.5 and 6 R⊙to the corona seen at lower altitudes in soft X-rays (e.g., with Yohkoh). The whitelight emission depends only on integrated electron density independent of temperature, whereas the soft X-ray emission depends upon the integral of electron density squared times a temperature function. The properties of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) will be reviewed briefly and their relationships to other solar and interplanetary phenomena will be noted.


2011 ◽  
Vol 742 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Pasachoff ◽  
V. Rušin ◽  
M. Saniga ◽  
H. Druckmüllerová ◽  
B. A. Babcock

1994 ◽  
pp. 217-221
Author(s):  
A. Sanchez-Ibarra ◽  
M. Cisneros-Molina ◽  
G. Hinojosa-Palafox ◽  
F. Cisneros-Peña ◽  
J. Guerrero De la Torre ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 347-349
Author(s):  
V. Rusin ◽  
V. Dermendjiev ◽  
M. Rybansky ◽  
G. Buyukliev

The problem of prominences-corona relationship is relativelly old. Already in 1931 Lockyer [1] showed that there is a close relation between prominences distribution and the form of white-light corona. However, this problem is still debatable and poses a number of controversial questions. One of them is the question of the energy and mass exchange between prominences and the ambient corona. It is generally assumed that the mass balance exists between the corona and prominences, but unambiguous observational proofs for prominences-corona plasma exchange are very rare. There are little data [2-4], as well, that could be used to address the problem of slight plasma flows from prominences to the corona.


2020 ◽  
Vol 495 (2) ◽  
pp. 2170-2178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vojtech Rušin ◽  
Paul Prikryl ◽  
Emil A Prikryl

ABSTRACT Light and dark adaptation and luminance contrast enhancement are well-known characteristics of human vision that allow us to observe a wide range of light intensity not fully captured in standard camera images. The naked-eye observations of total eclipses, some recorded with spectacular detail in artists’ paintings, reveal structure that is consistent with images obtained by telescopes equipped with recording media. The actual shape of the corona during a total eclipse depends not only on the phase of the solar cycle but, as can be simply demonstrated, also on the day-to-day variability and spatial distribution of coronal intensity that is determined by solar surface magnetic fields, including the locations of coronal holes that are the sources of high-speed solar wind causing geomagnetic storms. The latter were very similar for the eclipses in 1932, 1994, and 2017, which is the main reason why the naked-eye observations, as well as the processed images (1994 and 2017), of the white-light corona displayed very similar shapes. White-light corona image processing is a useful technique to enhance the contrast to observe fine-scale structure that is consistent with the physics of the solar atmosphere shaped by the magnetic field drawn out into the interplanetary space by solar wind.


Solar Physics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 279 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichiro Hanaoka ◽  
Yoshihiro Kikuta ◽  
Jun Nakazawa ◽  
Kouji Ohnishi ◽  
Kazuo Shiota

2019 ◽  
pp. 83-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Merzlyakov ◽  
Ts. Tsvetkov ◽  
L. Starkova ◽  
R. Miteva

Ground-based total solar eclipse observations are still the key method for coronal investigations. The question about its white-light degree of polarization remains unanswered. There are hypotheses claiming that the degree of polarization in certain regions of the corona may be higher than the maximal theoretically predicted value determined by Thomson scattering. We present polarization of the white-light solar corona observations obtained by three different teams during the March 29, 2006 solar total eclipse. We give an interpretation on how the polarization of the sky impacts brightness of the polarized solar corona, depending on the landscape during the totality. Moreover, it is shown that the singular polarization points of the corona are in linear dependence with the height of the Sun above the horizon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document