Canopy gap regime as a function of woodland age in the Kansas Cross Timbers

Plant Ecology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 220 (9) ◽  
pp. 887-900
Author(s):  
Beverly J. Cory ◽  
F. Leland Russell ◽  
Noah Keoshkerian
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 415-416 ◽  
pp. 38-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eike Feldmann ◽  
Lars Drößler ◽  
Markus Hauck ◽  
Stanislav Kucbel ◽  
Viliam Pichler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 1320-1330
Author(s):  
John W. Punches ◽  
Klaus J. Puettmann

The influence of adjacent canopy gaps on spatial distribution of epicormic branches and delayed foliage (originating from dormant buds) was investigated in 65-year-old coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii (Mirb.) Franco). Sample trees were selected across a broad range of local densities (adjacent canopy gap sizes) from a repeatedly thinned stand in which gaps had been created 12 years prior to our study. Lengths and stem locations of original and epicormic branches were measured within the south-facing crown quadrant, along with extents to which branches were occupied by sequential (produced in association with terminal bud elongation) and (or) delayed foliage. Epicormic branches, while prevalent throughout crowns, contributed only 10% of total branch length and 2% of total foliage mass. In contrast, delayed foliage occupied over 75% of total branch length, accounted for nearly 39% of total foliage mass, and often overlapped with sequential foliage. Canopy gap size did not influence original or epicormic branch length or location. On original branches, larger gaps may have modestly negatively influenced the relative extent of sequential foliage on branches and (or) slightly positively influenced delayed foliage mass. Delayed foliage appears to contribute substantially to Douglas-fir crown maintenance at this tree age, but canopy gap size had a minor influence, at least in the short term.


1956 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
William S. Wallace ◽  
W. Eugene Hollon
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 953-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato A. Ferreira de Lima ◽  
Leila Cunha de Moura

In the Atlantic Montane Rain Forest of South-eastern Brazil, a study was carried out to describe and evaluate canopy gap colonization. Gap composition by herb species was assessed through their soil coverage and woody species by measuring and identifying all individuals taller than one meter. Gap structure (gap size, number and diameter of treefalls), topographic position and surrounding vegetation were also measured. Two genera of Marantaceae were markedly frequent and abundant inside gaps. The more abundant and frequent woody species were shade tolerant. Species-rich families found inside gaps did not differ from the forest as a whole. Results revealed that direct and indirect influences of topography were important to determine gap composition of woody species. Evidently gap colonization had a considerable influence of topography and pre-established individuals besides variables of gap structure.


Web Ecology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Salvador-Van Eysenrode ◽  
F. Kockelbergh ◽  
J. Bogaert ◽  
I. Impens ◽  
P. Van Hecke

Abstract. Canopy gaps, i.e. openings in the forest cover caused by the fall of structural elements, are considered to be important for the maintenance of diversity and for the forest cycle. A gap can be considered as a young forest patch in the forest matrix, composed of interior surrounded by an edge, both enclosed by a perimeter. Much of the attention has been focused on the gap interior. However, at gap edges the spectrum of regeneration opportunities for plants may be larger than in the interior. Although definitions of gap are still discussed, any definition can describe it in an acceptable way, if justified, but defining edges is complicated and appropriate descriptors should be used. A method to determine gap interior and edge, using light as a descriptor, is presented with an example of gaps from a beech forest (Fagus sylvatica) in Belgium. Also, the relevance and implications of gap edges for plant diversity and calculation of forest turnover is discussed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 460-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. McGlinn ◽  
Roy Churchwell ◽  
Michael W. Palmer
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document