The adaptability of a wetland plant species Myriophyllum aquaticum to different nitrogen forms and nitrogen removal efficiency in constructed wetlands

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 7785-7795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Wang ◽  
Na Bai ◽  
Shengjun Xu ◽  
Guoqiang Zhuang ◽  
Zhihui Bai ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 232 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fátima Resende Luiz Fia ◽  
Antonio Teixeira de Matos ◽  
Ronaldo Fia ◽  
Mateus Pimentel de Matos ◽  
Alisson Carraro Borges ◽  
...  

Chemosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 216 ◽  
pp. 195-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Yan Tang ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Murray B. McBride ◽  
Ran Tao ◽  
Yu-Nv Dai ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 1686
Author(s):  
Chen Chen ◽  
Nannan Zhang ◽  
Zhe Liu ◽  
Shuqing An ◽  
Dehua Zhao

Intermittent aeration (IA) has been widely used in constructed wetlands (CWs) because it is economical and results in high nitrogen removal efficiency (RE). The aim of this study was to identify whether IA (4hday–1; the recommended frequency according to previous studies) in a partial area (PIA) can improve nitrogen RE compared with IA applied throughout the CW (TIA). Three types of laboratory-scale vertical flow CWs were constructed: PIA, TIA and non-aerated (NA). PIA achieved a higher RE of total nitrogen than TIA and NA (mean RE 60.6 v. 45.2 and 37.4% respectively). In the PIA, the ammonia mono-oxygenase subunit A (amoA) gene was abundant in aerated areas, whereas the nitrate reductase gene narG and nitrite reductase genes nirK and nirS were abundant in anaerobic areas. The results of this study suggest that PIA is an effective strategy for nitrogen removal when applying aeration in CWs because it preserves a constant anaerobic area for denitrification.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (21) ◽  
pp. 9202
Author(s):  
Leticia Y. Kochi ◽  
Patricia L. Freitas ◽  
Leila T. Maranho ◽  
Philippe Juneau ◽  
Marcelo P. Gomes

There is growing concern among health institutions worldwide to supply clean water to their populations, especially to more vulnerable communities. Although sewage treatment systems can remove most contaminants, they are not efficient at removing certain substances that can be detected in significant quantities even after standard treatments. Considering the necessity of perfecting techniques that can remove waterborne contaminants, constructed wetland systems have emerged as an effective bioremediation solution for degrading and removing contaminants. In spite of their environmentally friendly appearance and efficiency in treating residual waters, one of the limiting factors to structure efficient artificial wetlands is the choice of plant species that can both tolerate and remove contaminants. For sometimes, the chosen plants composing a system were not shown to increase wetland performance and became a problem since the biomass produced must have appropriated destination. We provide here an overview of the use and role of aquatic macrophytes in constructed wetland systems. The ability of plants to remove metals, pharmaceutical products, pesticides, cyanotoxins and nanoparticles in constructed wetlands were compared with the removal efficiency of non-planted systems, aiming to evaluate the capacity of plants to increase the removal efficiency of the systems. Moreover, this review also focuses on the management and destination of the biomass produced through natural processes of water filtration. The use of macrophytes in constructed wetlands represents a promising technology, mainly due to their efficiency of removal and the cost advantages of their implantation. However, the choice of plant species composing constructed wetlands should not be only based on the plant removal capacity since the introduction of invasive species can become an ecological problem.


1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. White

Constructed wetland technology is currently evolving into an acceptable, economically competitive alternative for many wastewater treatment applications. Although showing great promise for removing carbonaceous materials from wastewater, wetland systems have not been as successful at nitrification. This is primarily due to oxygen limitations. Nitrification does occur in conventional wetland treatment systems, but typically requires long hydraulic retention times. This paper describes a study that first evaluated the capability of subsurface flow constructed wetlands to treat a high strength seafood processor wastewater and then evaluated passive aeration configurations and effluent recirculation with respect to nitrogen treatment efficiency. The first stage of a 2-stage wetland treatment system exhibited a relatively short hydraulic retention time and was designed for BOD removal only. The second stage wetland employed an unsaturated inlet zone and effluent recirculation to enhance nitrification. Results indicate that organic loading, and thus BOD removal, in the first stage wetland is key to optimal nitrification. Passive aeration through an unsaturated inlet zone and recirculation achieved up to 65-70 per cent ammonia nitrogen removal at hydraulic retention times of about 3.5 days. Inlet zone configuration and effluent recirculation is shown to enhance the nitrogen removal capability of constructed wetland treatment systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document