A comparison of the GHG emissions caused by manufacturing tissue paper from virgin pulp or recycled waste paper

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 1618-1628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eskinder Demisse Gemechu ◽  
Isabela Butnar ◽  
Jordi Gomà-Camps ◽  
Alfred Pons ◽  
Francesc Castells
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aneta Masternak-Janus ◽  
Magdalena Rybaczewska-Błażejowska

Abstract The aim of this work is to compare the environmental impacts of two production processes of tissue paper using virgin pulp (virgin fiber) or waste paper pulp (recycled fiber). This comparison is based on the materials and energy used as well as emissions and waste resulting from the production of tissue paper. Life cycle assessment (LCA), ReCiPe method, was chosen as the analysis tool. The results of the research proved that electricity has the most considerable participation in the overall environmental impacts in both production processes, followed by either virgin pulp or heat. Consequently, these two production processes are the greatest contributors to the following midpoint environmental impact categories: human toxicity, climate change, human health and ecosystems, and fossil depletion. The analysis based on endpoint impact categories proved that the production process based on waste paper is more environmentally friendly than the one based on virgin pulp in all impact categories: human health, ecosystems, resources. This is largely because of its lower material and energy requirements in the entire life cycle. Due to the fact that the tissue paper is the final use of fiber, using recycled waste paper is strongly recommended. The obtained research results are a valuable source of management information for the decision makers at both company and national levels required to improve the environmental performance of tissue paper production.


2017 ◽  
Vol 742 ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Scholten ◽  
Niklas Plogmann ◽  
Dieter Meiners

During recycling of waste paper from private households different fractions containing plastics and polluted paper fibers are received. Those polluted fibers cannot be recycled in the common paper manufacturing process or for energy recovery like in waste incinerating plants due t o economic reasons. Current research at the Institute of Polymer Materials and Plastics Engineering at Clausthal University of Technology evaluated the use of this waste paper recyclate as a substitution for natural fibers as fillers and reinforcements in polypropylene. Special attention was given to the mechanical properties of the composites. Additionally the influence of maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (MAPP) as an adhesive was investigated.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viola Hospodarova ◽  
Nadezda Stevulova ◽  
Vojtech Vaclavik ◽  
Tomas Dvorsky

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadezda Stevulova ◽  
Viola Hospodarova ◽  
Jozef Junak

HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 604a-604
Author(s):  
J.H. Edwards ◽  
D.R. Smith ◽  
C.H. Gilliam ◽  
D.C. Erbach

Excessive moisture is a problem in evaluating recycled paper products as mulch to replace other common mulch materials and in landscape and container uses. To isolate the water associated with soil and/or media, two recycled paper products, pellets or crumble, were used as mulches in trade gallon containers in a greenhouse. Pine bark, pellets, and crumble needed to obtain standard mulch depth were enclosed in plastic mesh. These mulches were placed in containers that contained 1 kg of a 7 pine bark : 1 sand media. All containers were saturated with tap water for 24 hours. Mulches were placed on each container and allowed to drain for 1 hour. Weights of media, mulch, and media and mulch were obtained every 24 hours for a total of 312 hours. Water content of the media was not influenced by any of the mulch treatments. Water content of the paper products was increased by a factor of two. Pine bark mulch water content was zero 96 hours after an initial dry down cycle began, while the water content of pellet and crumble were 100 and 90 cm of water. Total water content of the media plus the mulch was increased by 30% to 35% when compared to pine bark mulch alone. However, the increase was associated with the water content of the waste paper mulch.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document