Life cycle assessment of osmotic microbial fuel cells for simultaneous wastewater treatment and resource recovery

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1962-1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyi Zhang ◽  
Heyang Yuan ◽  
Yelin Deng ◽  
Ibrahim M Abu-Reesh ◽  
Zhen He ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 622-623 ◽  
pp. 1118-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa Terumi Arashiro ◽  
Neus Montero ◽  
Ivet Ferrer ◽  
Francisco Gabriel Acién ◽  
Cintia Gómez ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 373 ◽  
pp. 1072-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidan Lu ◽  
Hongna Li ◽  
Guangcai Tan ◽  
Fang Wen ◽  
Michael T. Flynn ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 3629-3637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Foley ◽  
René A. Rozendal ◽  
Christopher K. Hertle ◽  
Paul A. Lant ◽  
Korneel Rabaey

Environments ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Ludwig Paul B. Cabling ◽  
Yumi Kobayashi ◽  
Evan G. R. Davies ◽  
Nicholas J. Ashbolt ◽  
Yang Liu

Municipal sewage contains significant embedded resources in the form of chemical and thermal energy. Recent developments in sustainable technology have pushed for the integration of resource recovery from household wastewater to achieve net zero energy consumption and carbon-neutral communities. Sewage heat recovery and fit-for-purpose water reuse are options to optimize the resource recovery potential of municipal wastewater. This study presents a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) focused on global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EUP), and human health carcinogenic potential (HHCP) of an integrated sewage heat recovery and water reuse system for a hypothetical community of 30,000 people. Conventional space and water heating components generally demonstrated the highest GWP contribution between the different system components evaluated. Sewage-heat-recovery-based district heating offered better environmental performance overall. Lower impact contributions were demonstrated by scenarios with a membrane bioreactor (MBR) and chlorination prior to water reuse applications compared to scenarios that use more traditional water and wastewater treatment technologies and discharge. The LCA findings show that integrating MBR wastewater treatment and water reuse into a district heating schema could provide additional environmental savings at a community scale.


2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 1074-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Remy ◽  
M. Boulestreau ◽  
J. Warneke ◽  
P. Jossa ◽  
C. Kabbe ◽  
...  

Energy and resource recovery from municipal wastewater is a pre-requisite for an efficient and sustainable water management in cities of the future. However, a sound evaluation of available processes and pathways is required to identify opportunities and short-comings of the different options and reveal synergies and potentials for optimization. For evaluating environmental impacts in a holistic view, the tool of life cycle assessment (LCA, ISO 14040/44) is suitable to characterize and quantify the direct and indirect effects of new processes and concepts. This paper gives an overview of four new processes and concepts for upgrading existing wastewater treatment plants towards energy positive and resource efficient wastewater treatment, based upon an evaluation of their environmental impacts with LCA using data from pilot and full-scale assessments of the considered processes.


ACS Omega ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (42) ◽  
pp. 27733-27733
Author(s):  
Faiza Niaz ◽  
Qasim Khan ◽  
Mustafa Ali ◽  
Wenxing Shen

2021 ◽  
Vol 775 ◽  
pp. 145904
Author(s):  
Jaecheul Yu ◽  
Younghyun Park ◽  
Evy Widyaningsih ◽  
Sunah Kim ◽  
Younggy Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document