A cell-centered lagrangian scheme in two-dimensional cylindrical geometry

2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 1479-1494 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZhiJun Shen ◽  
GuangWei Yuan ◽  
Yue JingYan ◽  
XueZhe Liu
2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1781-1824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Henri Maire ◽  
Rémi Abgrall ◽  
Jérôme Breil ◽  
Jean Ovadia

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1697-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Papadaki ◽  
Vasilis Bellos ◽  
Lazaros Ntoanidis ◽  
Elias Dimitriou

Abstract Hydraulic-habitat models combine the dynamic behavior of river discharge with geomorphological and ecological responses. In this study, they are used for estimating environmental flow requirements. We applied a Pseudo-two-dimensional (2D) model based on the one-dimensional (1D) HEC-RAS model and an in-house 2D (FLOW-R2D) hydrodynamic model to a section of river for several flows in respect of summer conditions of the study reach, and compared the results derived from the models in terms of water depths and velocities as well as habitat predictions in terms of weighted usable area (WUA). In general, 2D models are more promising in habitat studies since they quantify spatial variations and combinations of flow patterns important to stream flora and fauna in a higher detail than the 1D models. Relationships between WUA and discharge for the two models were examined, to compare the similarity as well as the magnitude of predictions over the modelled discharge range. The models predicted differences in the location of maxima and changes in variation of velocity and water depth. Finally, differences in spatial distribution (in terms of suitability indices and WUA) between the Pseudo-2D and the fully 2D modelling results can be considerable on a cell-by-cell basis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175682931984612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Yang ◽  
Mingjun Wei ◽  
Kun Jia ◽  
James Chen

It has been a challenge to simulate flexible flapping wings or other three-dimensional problems involving strong fluid–structure interactions. Solving a unified fluid–solid system in a monolithic manner improves both numerical stability and efficiency. The current algorithm considered a three-dimensional extension of an earlier work which formulated two-dimensional fluid–structure interaction monolithically under a unified framework for both fluids and solids. As the approach is extended from a two-dimensional to a three-dimensional configuration, a cell division technique and the associated projection process become necessary and are illustrated here. Two benchmark cases, a floppy viscoelastic particle in shear flow and a flow passing a rigid sphere, are simulated for validation. Finally, the three-dimensional monolithic algorithm is applied to study a micro-air vehicle with flexible flapping wings in a forward flight at different angles of attack. The simulation shows the impact from the angle of attack on wing deformation, wake vortex structures, and the overall aerodynamic performance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 563-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugochukwu David Uche ◽  
Shamsul Qamar ◽  
Andreas Seidel‐Morgenstern

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document