Success and Complication Rates of Two Precut Techniques, Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy and Needle-Knife Sphincterotomy for Bile Duct Cannulation

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 697-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Wang ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Feng Liu ◽  
Zhao-Shen Li ◽  
Xu Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Needle Knife ◽  
Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy

scholarly journals Comparison between transpancreatic sphincterotomy and needle-knife fistulotomy in difficulty biliary access, a retrospective study in Taiwan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Shun Liang ◽  
Chieh-Chang Chen ◽  
Wei-Chih Liao ◽  
Yu-ting Kuo ◽  
Liang-Wei Tseng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Biliary Cannulation ◽  
Access Rate ◽  
Needle Knife ◽  
Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy

Abstract Background Selective deep biliary cannulation is the first and the most important step before further biliary therapy. Transpancreatic sphincterotomy(TPS), and needle knife fistulotomy(NKF) were commonly used in patients with difficult cannulation, but few studies compare the outcome between TPS and NKF. Aims To investigate the success rate and complications of NKF and TPS in patients with difficult biliary access. Methods A total of 78 patients who met the criteria of difficult cannulation in the National Taiwan University hospital from October 2015 to October 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Their baseline demographics, success rate of biliary cannulation, and the rate of adverse events were assessed. Results 31 patients and 47 patients underwent TPS and NKF for difficult biliary access, respectively. The characteristics of the 2 groups were similar, but patients in TPS group had more frequent pancreatic duct cannulation. Bile duct cannulation was successful in 23 patients (74.2 %) in the TPS group and 39 (83.0%) in the NKF group (P=0.34). There was no difference between the TPS and NKF in the rate of adverse events, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) (16.1% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.17), and hemorrhage (3.2% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.35). No perforation occurred. Conclusions Both TPS and NKF have good biliary access rate in patient with difficult cannulation. TPS has acceptable successful rate and similar complication rate, compared with NKF.

scholarly journals Comparison between transpancreatic sphincterotomy and needle-knife fistulotomy in difficulty biliary access, a retrospective study in Taiwan

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Shun Liang ◽  
Chieh-Chang Chen ◽  
Wei-Chih Liao ◽  
Yu-ting Kuo ◽  
Liang-Wei Tseng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Biliary Cannulation ◽  
Access Rate ◽  
Needle Knife ◽  
Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy

Abstract Background Selective deep biliary cannulation is the first and the most important step before further biliary therapy. Transpancreatic sphincterotomy(TPS), and needle knife fistulotomy(NKF) were commonly used in patients with difficult cannulation, but few studies compare the outcome between TPS and NKF. Aims To investigate the success rate and complications of NKF and TPS in patients with difficult biliary access. Methods A total of 78 patients who met the criteria of difficult cannulation in the National Taiwan University hospital from October 2015 to October 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Their baseline demographics, succesfs rate of biliary cannulation, and the rate of adverse events were assessed. Results 31 patients and 47 patients underwent TPS and NKF for difficult biliary access, respectively. The characteristics of the 2 groups were similar, but patients in TPS group had more frequent pancreatic duct cannulation. Bile duct cannulation was successful in 23 patients (74.2 %) in the TPS group and 39 (83.0%) in the NKF group (P=0.34). There was no difference between the TPS and NKF in the rate of adverse events, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) (16.1% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.17), and hemorrhage (3.2% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.35). No perforation occurred. Conclusions Both TPS and NKF have good biliary access rate in patient with difficult cannulation. TPS has acceptable successful rate and similar complication rate, compared with NKF.

scholarly journals Comparison between transpancreatic sphincterotomy and needle-knife fistulotomy in difficulty biliary access, a retrospective study in Taiwan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Shun Liang ◽  
Chieh-Chang Chen ◽  
Wei-Chih Liao ◽  
Yu-ting Kuo ◽  
Liang-Wei Tseng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Biliary Cannulation ◽  
Access Rate ◽  
Needle Knife ◽  
Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy

Abstract Background Selective deep biliary cannulation is the first and the most important step before further biliary therapy. Transpancreatic sphincterotomy(TPS), and needle knife fistulotomy(NKF) were commonly used in patients with difficult cannulation, but few studies compare the outcome between TPS and NKF.Methods A total of 78 patients who met the criteria of difficult cannulation in the National Taiwan University hospital from October 2015 to October 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Their baseline demographics, success rate of biliary cannulation, and the rate of adverse events were assessed.Results 31 patients and 47 patients underwent TPS and NKF for difficult biliary access, respectively. The characteristics of the 2 groups were similar, but patients in TPS group had more frequent pancreatic duct cannulation. Bile duct cannulation was successful in 23 patients (74.2 %) in the TPS group and 39 (83.0%) in the NKF group (P=0.34). There was no difference between the TPS and NKF in the rate of adverse events, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) (16.1% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.17), and hemorrhage (3.2% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.35). No perforation occurred.Conclusions Both TPS and NKF have good biliary access rate in patient with difficult cannulation. TPS has acceptable successful rate and similar complication rate, compared with NKF.

Endoscopic Needle Knife Precut Papillotomy for Inaccessible Bile Duct following Failed Pancreatic Duct Access

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. CGast.S1120
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Miyatani ◽  
Yukio Yoshida
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Pancreatic Ducts ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Group A ◽  
Needle Knife ◽  
Group B

Aims To evaluate the safety, effectiveness, success rate and complications of needle knife precut papillotomy for inaccessible bile duct after failed pancreatic ducts access. Methods Selective common bile duct cannulation was required for 582 patients from November 2004 to May 2008. Precut sphincterotomy was performed in 28 patients (16 male, 12 female; mean age 71). When standard bile duct cannulation was unsuccessful after more than 20 minutes, the bile duct was considered inaccessible. Group A consisted of patients where pancreatic duct access was possible and transpancreatic papillary septotomy was performed (20 patients). If pancreatic duct cannulation also failed, needle knife precut method was performed and these patients belonged to group B (8 patients). The success and complication rates of the two groups were compared using the Chi-square test. Results The success rates were 85% and 87.5% respectively. Of the 28 patients in group A, 6 had mild to moderate pancreatitis and one patient had mild bleeding. The complication rates were 35% and 0% respectively and the differences were not significant. Conclusion Needle knife precut papillotomy is useful and acceptable in patients after failed pancreatic duct access.

scholarly journals Transpancreatic sphincterotomy has a higher cannulation success rate than needle-knife precut papillotomy – a meta-analysis

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (09) ◽  
pp. 874-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dániel Pécsi ◽  
Nelli Farkas ◽  
Péter Hegyi ◽  
Márta Balaskó ◽  
József Czimmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Needle Knife ◽  
Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy ◽  
Cannulation Success Rate ◽  
Cannulation Success

Abstract Background and aim While many studies have discussed the different cannulation techniques used in patients with difficult biliary access, no previous meta-analyses have compared transpancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS) to other advanced techniques. Therefore, we aimed to identify all studies comparing the efficacy and adverse event rates of TPS with needle-knife precut papillotomy (NKPP), the most commonly used technique, and to perform a meta-analysis. Methods The Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases were searched for trials comparing the outcomes of TPS with NKPP up till December 2016. A meta-analysis focusing on outcome (cannulation success, post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP), post-procedural bleeding, and total adverse events) was performed. The population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) format was used to compare these cannulation approaches. Five prospective and eight retrospective studies were included in our meta-analysis. Results NKPP has a significantly lower success rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, P = 0.046; relative risk [RR] 0.92, P = 0.03) and a higher rate of bleeding complications (OR 2.24, P = 0.02; RR 2.18, P = 0.02) than TPS. However, no significant differences were found in PEP (OR 0.79, P = 0.24; RR 0.80, P = 0.19), perforation (risk difference [RD] 0.01, P = 0.23), or total complication rates (OR 1.22, P = 0.44; RR 1.17, P = 0.47). Conclusion While TPS has a higher success rate in difficult biliary access and causes less bleeding than NKPP, there are no differences in PEP, perforation, or total complication rates between the two approaches. We conclude that TPS, in the hands of expert endoscopists, is a safe procedure, which should be used more widely in patients with difficult biliary access.

scholarly journals Biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiography: How to tackle the difficult papilla

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark op den Winkel ◽  
Jörg Schirra ◽  
Christian Schulz ◽  
Enrico N. De Toni ◽  
Christian J. Steib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Drainage ◽  
Guide Wire ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Biliary Cannulation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Difficult Biliary Cannulation ◽  
Needle Knife ◽  
Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy

Background: In the setting of a naïve papilla, biliary cannulation is a key step in successfully performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Difficult biliary cannulation (DBC) is associated with an increased risk of post-ERCP-pancreatitis and failure of the whole procedure. Summary: Recommendations for biliary cannulation can be divided in (a) measures to reduce the likelihood of a difficult papilla-situation a priori and (b) rescue techniques in case the endoscopist is actually facing DBC. (a): careful inspection of the papillary anatomy and optimizing its accessibility by scope-positioning is fundamental. A sphincterotome in combination with a soft-tip hydrophilic guide-wire rather than a standard catheter with a standard guide-wire should be used. (b): The most important rescue techniques are needle-knife precut, double-guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy. In few cases, anterograde techniques are needed. To this regard, the EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) followed by rendezvous is increasingly used as an alternative to percutaneous-transhepatic biliary drainage. Key Messages: Biliary cannulation can be accomplished with alternative retrograde or less frequently by salvage-anterograde techniques, once conventional direct cannulation attempts have failed. Considering recent favorable data for the early use of transpancreatic sphincterotomy, an adopted version of the 2016 European-Society-for-Gastrointestinal-Endoscopy (ESGE)-algorithm on biliary cannulation is proposed.

scholarly journals Troubleshooting Difficult Bile Duct Access: Advanced ERCP Cannulation Techniques, Percutaneous Biliary Drainage, or EUS-Guided Rendezvous Technique?

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-422
Author(s):  
Ting-Ting Chan ◽  
Marcus C. H. Chew ◽  
Raymond S. Y. Tang
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Biliary Drainage ◽  
Percutaneous Biliary Drainage ◽  
Rendezvous Technique ◽  
Surgically Altered Anatomy ◽  
Appropriate Treatment ◽  
Benign Pathology ◽  
Cannulation Technique ◽  
Needle Knife

Despite experienced hands and availability of various well-designed catheters and wires, selective bile duct cannulation may still fail in 10–20% of cases during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In case standard ERCP cannulation technique fails, salvage options include advanced ERCP cannulation techniques such as double-guidewire technique (DGW) with or without pancreatic stenting and precut papillotomy, percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided Rendezvous (EUS-RV) ERCP. If the pancreatic duct is inadvertently entered during cannulation attempts, DGW technique is a reasonable next step, which can be followed by pancreatic stenting to reduce risks of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Studies suggest that early precut papillotomy is not associated with a higher risk of PEP, while needle-knife fistulotomy is the preferred method. For patients with critical clinical condition who may not be fit for endoscopy, surgically altered anatomy in which endoscopic biliary drainage is not feasible, and non-communicating multisegmental biliary obstruction, PBD has a unique role to provide successful biliary drainage efficiently in this particular population. As endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage techniques advance, EUS-RV ERCP has been increasingly employed to guide bile duct access and cannulation with satisfactory clinical outcomes and is especially valuable for benign pathology at centres where expertise is available. Endoscopists should become familiar with each technique’s advantages and limitations before deciding the most appropriate treatment that is tailored to patient’s anatomy and clinical needs.

scholarly journals Outcomes of precut sphincterotomy techniques in cases of difficult biliary access

2020 ◽  
pp. flgastro-2019-101380
Author(s):  
Jared Rejeski ◽  
Marc Hines ◽  
Jason Jones ◽  
Jason Conway ◽  
Girish Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Volume ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Biliary Cannulation ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stenting ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Effective Option ◽  
Needle Knife ◽  
Precut Sphincterotomy ◽  
Rectal Indomethacin

GoalsOur study aims to define success and complication rates of precut sphincterotomy with the needle-knife and transpancreatic papillary septotomy (TPS) techniques as experienced at a single, high-volume endoscopy centre.BackgroundComplication rates rise with increasing number of failed attempts at biliary cannulation; therefore, early precut sphincterotomy (PS) has been recommended. Selecting the ideal method for PS can be challenging and there is a paucity of data to help guide this decision.StudyWe performed a retrospective analysis over 37 months of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) experience at a single institution. We identified all ERCPs performed and stratified based on the presence of PS; if PS occurred, a thorough chart review was performed to identify success and complication rates. Patients received guideline-driven management for post-ERCP pancreatitis including rectal indomethacin and pancreatic duct stenting when appropriate.ResultsWe identified 1808 ERCP procedures performed during this time. Successful biliary cannulation was achieved in 1748 cases, yielding a success rate of 96.7% (Grades I–IV ERCP difficulty/complexity). PS was required in 232 cases (12.8%); we identified 88 TPS cases and 114 needle-knife precut sphincterotomy (NKPS) cases. Complications following PS procedures occurred in 9.1% of TPS patients and 11.4% of NKPS patients. Success rates for TPS and NKPS were 97.7% and 81.6%, respectively—a statistically significant difference (p<0.001).ConclusionThis data supports TPS as a safe and effective option for biliary access in difficult cannulation settings when performed by experienced advanced endoscopists.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document