The value of trauma patients’ centralization: an analysis of a regional Italian Trauma System performance with TMPM-ICD-9

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Fugazzola ◽  
Vanni Agnoletti ◽  
Silvia Bertoni ◽  
Costanza Martino ◽  
Matteo Tomasoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
System Performance ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Trauma Patients

scholarly journals Effectiveness of trauma care systems at different stages of development in reducing mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e047439
Author(s):  
Rayan Jafnan Alharbi ◽  
Virginia Lewis ◽  
Sumina Shrestha ◽  
Charne Miller
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Trauma Care ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Trauma Systems ◽  
Stages Of Development

IntroductionThe introduction of trauma systems that began in the 1970s resulted in improved trauma care and a decreased rate of morbidity and mortality of trauma patients. Worldwide, little is known about the effectiveness of trauma care system at different stages of development, from establishing a trauma centre, to implementing a trauma system and as trauma systems mature. The objective of this study is to extract and analyse data from research that evaluates mortality rates according to different stages of trauma system development globally.Methods and analysisThe proposed review will comply with the checklist of the ‘Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis’. In this review, only peer-reviewed articles written in English, human-related studies and published between January 2000 and December 2020 will be included. Articles will be retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Additional articles will be identified from other sources such as references of included articles and author lists. Two independent authors will assess the eligibility of studies as well as critically appraise and assess the methodological quality of all included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias for Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool. Two independent authors will extract the data to minimise errors and bias during the process of data extraction using an extraction tool developed by the authors. For analysis calculation, effect sizes will be expressed as risk ratios or ORs for dichotomous data or weighted (or standardised) mean differences and 95% CIs for continuous data in this systematic review.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review will use secondary data only, therefore, research ethics approval is not required. The results from this study will be submitted to a peer-review journal for publication and we will present our findings at national and international conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019142842.

SP9.1.7 Emergency Laparotomy for Trauma in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a Prospective Multicentre Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Vulliamy ◽  
Max Marsden ◽  
Richard Carden ◽  
Karim Brohi ◽  
Ross Davenport ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Young Males ◽  
Prospective Multicentre Study ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Emergency Abdominal Surgery

Abstract Aims Trauma patients requiring abdominal surgery have significant morbidity and mortality, but are not included in existing national audits of emergency laparotomy. The aim of this study was to examine processes of care and outcomes among trauma patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery in the UK and Ireland. Methods A prospective trainee-led multicentre audit was conducted over six months from January 2019 across the national trauma system. Patients undergoing laparotomy or laparoscopy within 24 hours of injury were included. Subgroup analysis was conducted in those requiring major haemorrhage protocol (MHP) activation. Results The study included 363 patients from 34 hospitals (22 major trauma centres). The majority were young males with no co-morbidities who required surgery for control of bleeding (51%) or exploration of penetrating injuries (46%). Over 85% received consultant-led care in the emergency department (318/363) and operating theatre (321/363). The MHP subgroup made up 45% of the cohort but accounted for 97% of deaths and 79% of ICU days, with a mortality rate of 19% and a massive transfusion rate of 32%. Compared to non-MHP patients they had shorter times to theatre (122 vs 218 minutes, p < 0.001), higher rates of advanced prehospital care (60% vs 33%, p < 0.001) and higher rates of consultant-led care (95% vs 85%, p < 0.001). Conclusion The majority of trauma patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery receive consultant-delivered perioperative care which is appropriately tailored to patient risk profile. Despite this, mortality and resource utilization among high-risk patients remains substantial, justifying ongoing performance improvement initiatives and research into novel therapeutics.

scholarly journals Effect of Under Triage on Early Mortality After Major Pediatric Trauma: A Registry-based Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
François-Xavier Ageron ◽  
Jordan Porteaud ◽  
Jean-Noël Evain ◽  
Anne Millet ◽  
Jules Greze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Trauma Care ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Risk Of Death

Abstract Backgroundlittle is known about the effect of under triage on early mortality in trauma in a pediatric population. Our objective is to describe the effect of under triage on 24 hour-mortality after major pediatric trauma in a regional trauma systemMethodsThis cohort study was conducted from January 2009 to December 2017. Data were obtained from the registry of the Northern French Alps Trauma System. The network guidelines triage pediatric trauma patients according to an algorithm shared with adult patients. Under triage was defined by the number of pediatric trauma patients that required specialized trauma care transported to a non-level I pediatric trauma center on the total number of injured patients with critical resource use. The effect of under triage on 24 hour-mortality was assessed with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and a propensity score (Ps) matching analysis. ResultsA total of 1 143 pediatric patients were included (mean [SD], age 10 [5] years), mainly after a blunt trauma (1130 [99%]). Of the children, 402 (35%) had an ISS higher than 15 and 547 (48%) required specialized trauma care. Nineteen (1.7%) patients died within 24 hours. Under triage rate was 33% based on the need of specialized trauma care. Under triage of children requiring specialized trauma care increased the risk of death in IPTW (risk difference: 6.0 [95% CI 1.3-10.7]) and Ps matching analyses (risk difference: 3.1 [95% CI 0.8-5.4]).ConclusionsIn a regional inclusive trauma system, under triage increased the risk of early death after pediatric major trauma.

scholarly journals Improvement in geriatric trauma outcomes in an evolving trauma system

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amund Hovengen Ringen ◽  
Iver Anders Gaski ◽  
Hege Rustad ◽  
Nils Oddvar Skaga ◽  
Christine Gaarder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma System ◽  
Trauma Team ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Geriatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Trauma Team Activation ◽  
Activation Rate ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
Activation Rates

BackgroundThe elderly trauma patient has increased mortality compared with younger patients. During the last 15 years, initial treatment of severely injured patients at Oslo University Hospital Ulleval (OUHU) has changed resulting in overall improved outcomes. Whether this holds true for the elderly trauma population needs exploration and was the aim of the present study.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of 2628 trauma patients 61 years or older admitted to OUHU during the 12-year period, 2002–2013. The population was stratified based on age (61–70 years, 71–80 years, 81 years and older) and divided into time periods: 2002–2009 (P1) and 2010–2013 (P2). Multiple logistic regression models were constructed to identify clinically relevant core variables correlated with mortality and trauma team activation rate.ResultsCrude mortality decreased from 19% in P1 to 13% in P2 (p<0.01) with an OR of 0.77 (95 %CI 0.65 to 0.91) when admitted in P2. Trauma team activation rates increased from 53% in P1 to 72% in P2 (p<0.01) with an OR of 2.16 (95% CI 1.93 to 2.41) for being met by a trauma team in P2. Mortality increased from 10% in the age group 61–70 years to 26% in the group above 80 years. Trauma team activation rates decreased from 71% in the age group 61–70 years to 50% in the age group older than 80 years. Median ISS were 17 in all three age groups and in both time periods.DiscussionDevelopment of a multidisciplinary dedicated trauma service is associated with increased trauma team activation rate as well as survival in geriatric trauma patients. As expected, mortality increased with age, although inversely related to the likelihood of being met by a trauma team. Trauma team activation should be considered for all trauma patients older than 70 years.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

scholarly journals C.07 Door to decompression should be the benchmark in trauma craniotomies

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (S2) ◽  
pp. S12-S13
Author(s):  
J Marcoux ◽  
D Bracco
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
System Performance ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Delivery Of Care ◽  
Surgical Positioning ◽  
Anesthesia Time ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Decompression Time

Background: Quality control indicators for mass lesion in TBI use the delay between emergency department (ED) and OR arrival to measure quality of care. It does not provide the timing of brain decompression. The goals of this study are to observe step by step where delays occur from hospital admission until effective decompression of the brain. Methods: A prospective observational data collection of timing from ED admission to decompression was conducted for all emergency trauma craniotomies over a period of 15 months. Results: Sixty-five patients were included. Doing a CT at the outside institution instead of transferring the patient prior to CT resulted in a 112min delay in care. Neurosurgery team notification prior to patient’s arrival to ED shortened delivery of care by 51min. The time elapsed between OR arrival and brain decompression was 50min: anesthesia time 3min, surgical positioning/preparation 29min and surgical time 17min. Burrhole decompression followed by craniotomy (9min) shortened the decompression time by 17min compared to standard 4 holes craniotomy approach (26min). Conclusions: Benchmark for trauma system performance in emergency craniotomies should be door to decompression time. Bypassing CT in local hospitals, pre-alerting neurosurgeons, and burrhole decompression followed by standard craniotomy significantly decrease door to decompression time.

Mortality by Decade in Trauma Patients with Glasgow Coma Scale 3

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 1342-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Ley ◽  
Morgan A. Clond ◽  
Omar N. Hussain ◽  
Marissa Srour ◽  
James Mirocha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Glasgow Coma Scale ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Coma Scale ◽  
The Third ◽  
Aggressive Care ◽  
Improvement In Survival

The aim of this study was to assess how increasing age affects mortality in trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 3. The Los Angeles County Trauma System Database was queried for all patients aged 20 to 99 years admitted with GCS 3. Mortality was 41.8 per cent for the 3306 GCS 3 patients. Mortality in the youngest patients reviewed, those in the third decade, was 43.5 per cent. After logistic regression analysis, patients in the third decade had similar mortality rates to patients in the sixth (adjusted OR, 0.88; CI, 0.68 to 1.14; P = 0.33) and seventh decades (adjusted OR, 0.96; CI, 0.70 to 1.31; P = 0.79). A significantly lower mortality rate, however, was noted in the fifth decade (adjusted OR, 0.76; CI, 0.61 to 0.95; P = 0.02). Conversely, significantly higher mortality rates were noted in the eighth (adjusted OR, 1.93; CI, 1.38 to 2.71; P = 0.0001) and combined ninth/tenth decades (adjusted OR, 2.47; CI, 1.71 to 3.57; P < 0.0001). Given the high survival in trauma patients with GCS 3 as well as continued improvement in survival compared with historical controls, aggressive care is indicated for patients who present to the emergency department with GCS 3.

Compliance with Closest Hospital Transport Protocol

1992 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Norton ◽  
Edward A. Bartkus ◽  
Keith W. Neely ◽  
John A. Schriver ◽  
Jerris R. Hedges
Keyword(s):  
Trauma System ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Patient Transport ◽  
Multnomah County ◽  
Ground Ambulance ◽  
Hospital Transport ◽  
Trauma Score ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Multiple Patients

AbstractHypothesis:Paramedics accurately estimate the closest trauma hospital for ground transport.Population:Ground ambulance scene transports of trauma system patients to six participating trauma hospitals in Multnomah County, Oregon from 1 January 1986 to 1 January 1987 were studied. Transports involving multiple patients or pediatric patients were excluded.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive patient transports to be taken to the closest trauma hospital as required by protocol. The availability of each hospital to receive trauma patients was monitored continuously by a central communications facility. Paramedics were provided hospital availability data at the time of patient system entry. When several hospitals were available, the paramedics were required by protocol to select the “closest” hospital. Subsequently, the vector distance from the trauma site to each of the available hospitals was measured using a grid map. This method was validated by odometer measurement (r2 = 0.924). Chisquare analysis was used to analyze hospital bypasses to specific hospitals.Results:Of the 1193 eligible patients entered into the trauma system, 160 (13%; 95% CI = 11–15%) transports bypassed the closest available hospital for a receiving hospital ≥1 mile more distant. There were 11 (1%; 0–2%) patients transported to a hospital more than five miles more distant. Of the 132 patients with a trauma score (TS) <12, 15 (11%; 6–18%) were taken to a hospital one mile or further beyond the closest hospital. None (0%; 0–2%) were transported more than five miles past the closest hospital. Of the six hospitals, three were bypassed more than one mile significantly more often then they received bypass patients. One hospital received such patients four times more than it was bypassed (p <.001).Conclusion:While paramedics generally can identify the closest hospital for trauma patient transport, some systematic hospital bypass errors occur. If a community wants assurance of an equitable patient distribution among participating trauma hospitals and assignment of the closest geographic hospital for injured patients, then map vector distance determination to identify the closest available hospital should supplement paramedic dispatching.

Pediatric Secondary Overtriage in a Statewide Trauma System

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 763-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Leung ◽  
Patrick Bonasso ◽  
Kevin Lynch ◽  
Dustin Long ◽  
Richard Vaughan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma System ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Comfort Level ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Local Facility ◽  
Patient Arrival ◽  
Clinical Indices ◽  
Patterns Of Injury

Secondary overtriage is a term that describes patients who are discharged home shortly after being transferred, an indication that transfer and hospitalization were unnecessary. The study goal was to identify factors associated with secondary triage. A statewide trauma registry was used to identify trauma patients aged less than 18 years during a 6-year period (2007–2012) who were discharged within 48 hours from arrival and did not undergo a surgical procedure. We compared those that were treated at initial facility and those transferred to a second facility using clinical indices including patterns of injury pattern using multivariate logistic regression. Of the 4441 patients who fit our inclusion criteria, 801 (18%) were transferred. Younger age groups were more likely to be transferred. Factors associated with being transferred included head, spinal, and facial injuries, and patient arrival during the nighttime work shifts. In conclusion, young patients who have signs of possible neurological or spinal injuries and those who arrive during nondaytime shifts during the workday are more likely to be transferred to another trauma center. These may reflect the comfort level and resources of the local facility.

Transporting major trauma patients from the margins of a UK trauma system

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Nutbeam ◽  
Alan Leaman ◽  
Peter Oakley
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Trauma Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document