Techno-economic characteristics of wastewater treatment plants retrofitted from the conventional activated sludge process to the membrane bioreactor process

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingwei Gao ◽  
Kang Xiao ◽  
Jiao Zhang ◽  
Wenchao Xue ◽  
Chunhai Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Membrane Bioreactor ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Activated Sludge Process ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge Process ◽  
Bioreactor Process

Removal Characteristics of Human Antibiotics during Wastewater Treatment in Japan

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kobayashi ◽  
M. Yasojima ◽  
K. Komori ◽  
Y. Suzuki ◽  
H. Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Batch Experiment ◽  
Aqueous Environment ◽  
Activated Sludge Process ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge Process

Pharmaceuticals resident in sewage and in the aqueous environment has begun to attract attention. The objectives of this research were to clarify the behaviour of selected human antibiotics in wastewater treatment plants, namely levofloxacin (LVFX), clarithromycin (CAM) and azithromycin (AZM) which are much used in Japan. The concentrations in raw influent of LVFX, CAM, AZM were respectively 425~981ng/L, 340~573ng/L, ND(<190 ng/L)~371ng/L. The averages of removal ratio were about 50 % for all selected antibiotics. It was suggested that selected antibiotics was not too much removed in the conventional creature processing like the conventional activated sludge process. The remarkable removals in activated sludge tank using high class treatment method were confirmed about all selected antibiotics. The rise of the concentrations of CAM and AZM was confirmed after the addition of chemical coagulants in one wastewater treatment plant. From the result of batch experiment with activated sludge, it was suggested that LVFX and AZM were removed from water mainly by the absorption to activated sludge. Also, in batch experiment with chemical coagulants, it was suggested that LVFX was removed from water and CAM, AZM were eluted a little in water by adding sulphuric acid band.

scholarly journals LCA of a Membrane Bioreactor Compared to Activated Sludge System for Municipal Wastewater Treatment

Membranes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 421
Author(s):  
Dimitra C. Banti ◽  
Michail Tsangas ◽  
Petros Samaras ◽  
Antonis Zorpas
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Membrane Bioreactor ◽  
Municipal Wastewater ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Municipal Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge

Membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems are connected to several advantages compared to the conventional activated sludge (CAS) units. This work aims to the examination of the life cycle environmental impact of an MBR against a CAS unit when treating municipal wastewater with similar influent loading (BOD = 400 mg/L) and giving similar high-quality effluent (BOD < 5 mg/L). The MBR unit contained a denitrification, an aeration and a membrane tank, whereas the CAS unit included an equalization, a denitrification, a nitrification, a sedimentation, a mixing, a flocculation tank and a drum filter. Several impact categories factors were calculated by implementing the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology, including acidification potential, eutrophication potential, global warming potential (GWP), ozone depletion potential and photochemical ozone creation potential of the plants throughout their life cycle. Real data from two wastewater treatment plants were used. The research focused on two parameters which constitute the main differences between the two treatment plants: The excess sludge removal life cycle contribution—where GWPMBR = 0.50 kg CO2-eq*FU−1 and GWPCAS = 2.67 kg CO2-eq*FU−1 without sludge removal—and the wastewater treatment plant life cycle contribution—where GWPMBR = 0.002 kg CO2-eq*FU−1 and GWPCAS = 0.14 kg CO2-eq*FU−1 without land area contribution. Finally, in all the examined cases the environmental superiority of the MBR process was found.

Feasibility of the membrane bioreactor process for water reclamation

2001 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Adham ◽  
P. Gagliardo ◽  
L. Boulos ◽  
J. Oppenheimer ◽  
R. Trussell
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Membrane Bioreactor ◽  
Cost Evaluation ◽  
Water Reclamation ◽  
Activated Sludge Process ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge ◽  
In Series ◽  
Volumetric Loading ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge Process

The feasibility of the membrane bioreactor (MBR) process for water reclamation was studied. Process evaluation was based on the following: literature review of MBRs, worldwide survey of MBRs, and preliminary costs estimates. The literature review and the survey have shown that the MBR process offers several benefits over the conventional activated sludge process, including: smaller space and reactor requirements, better effluent water quality, disinfection, increased volumetric loading, and less sludge production. The MBR process can exist in two different configurations, one with the low-pressure membrane modules replacing the clarifier downstream the bioreactor (in series), and the second with the membranes submerged within the bioreactor. Four major companies are currently marketing MBRs while many other companies are also in the process of developing new MBRs. The MBR process operates in a considerably different range of parameters than the conventional activated sludge process. The preliminary cost evaluation has shown that the MBR process is cost competitive with other conventional wastewater treatment processes.

Production of Sludge in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor and Dewatering Aspects

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Watsa Khongnakorn ◽  
Christelle Wisniewski
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Water Reuse ◽  
Membrane Bioreactor ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Good Prediction ◽  
Activated Sludge Process ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge ◽  
Sludge Dewaterability ◽  
Conventional Activated Sludge Process ◽  
Sludge Production

In wastewater treatment, the membrane bioreactor (MBR) holds the potential to become one of the new generation processes, ensuring effluent quality and disinfection of sufficiently high levels to allow water reuse and recycle. Furthermore, the possibility to operate with high biomass concentrations (2 to 5 times higher than in conventional activated sludge process, CAS) allows to impose high solid retention times(SRT) that can be beneficial to a sludge production reduction and so to a reduction of disposal costs. These non-conventional operating conditions (high SRT) can also induce different sludge characteristics and dewatering aptitude, which are essential parameters for the optimization of the sludge post-treatment, like mechanical dewatering. The objective of this work was to study the performances of a complete sludge retention membrane bioreactor, in terms of organic removal efficiency, sludge production and sludge dewaterability. The adaptability of Activated Sludge Model 3 (ASM3) to provide good prediction results of high SRT-MBR was studied. Typical parameters adopted to describe sludge dewaterability were quantified and compared with the conventional activated sludge process (CAS).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document