System Identification Methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: Review and Comparison

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin Reynders
2003 ◽  
Vol 36 (16) ◽  
pp. 1609-1614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Guillaume ◽  
Peter Verboven ◽  
Bart Cauberghe ◽  
Steve Vanlanduit ◽  
Eli Parloo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zakir Faruquee ◽  
Hal Gurgenci

Two output -only system identification methods namely Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA) and Frequency Domain Decomposition (FDD) were used to estimate the dynamics (Mode shape, natural frequency and damping ratio) of the model boom of the dragline DRE 23. The boom was excited separately with an impulse hammer and with an electrodynamic shaker with chirp, random and simulated field excitations. In all cases, the excitations as well as the responses of the model boom were measured. The dynamics were obtained from the response measurements using Output-Only methods as well as from both the excitations and responses using conventional modal analysis methods. In all cases, the estimations of the dynamics by Output-Only methods were comparable if not better than those estimates obtained by the convention modal analysis methods.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Castillo Zuñiga ◽  
Alain Giacobini Souza ◽  
Roberto G. da Silva ◽  
Luiz Carlos Sandoval Góes

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Klyde ◽  
Chuck Harris ◽  
Peter M. Thompson ◽  
Edward N. Bachelder

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1602
Author(s):  
Ángel Molina-Viedma ◽  
Elías López-Alba ◽  
Luis Felipe-Sesé ◽  
Francisco Díaz

Experimental characterization and validation of skin components in aircraft entails multiple evaluations (structural, aerodynamic, acoustic, etc.) and expensive campaigns. They require different rigs and equipment to perform the necessary tests. Two of the main dynamic characterizations include the energy absorption under impact forcing and the identification of modal parameters through the vibration response under any broadband excitation, which also includes impacts. This work exploits the response of a stiffened aircraft composite panel submitted to a multi-impact excitation, which is intended for impact and energy absorption analysis. Based on the high stiffness of composite materials, the study worked under the assumption that the global response to the multi-impact excitation is linear with small strains, neglecting the nonlinear behavior produced by local damage generation. Then, modal identification could be performed. The vibration after the impact was measured by high-speed 3D digital image correlation and employed for full-field operational modal analysis. Multiple modes were characterized in a wide spectrum, exploiting the advantages of the full-field noninvasive techniques. These results described a consistent modal behavior of the panel along with good indicators of mode separation given by the auto modal assurance criterion (Auto-MAC). Hence, it illustrates the possibility of performing these dynamic characterizations in a single test, offering additional information while reducing time and investment during the validation of these structures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document